Investigating the Relationship between Students’ Views of Scientific Models and Their Development of Models

References

• Akerson, V., White, O., Colak, H., & Pongsanon, K. (2011). Relationships between elementary teachers’ conceptions of scientific modeling and the nature of science. In M. Khine & I. Saleh (Eds.), Models and modeling: Cognitive tools for scientific enquiry (pp. 221–237). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Balushi, S. M. (2009). Factors influencing pre-service science teachers’ imagination at the microscopic level in chemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(6), 1089–1110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Balushi, S. M. (2011). Students’ evaluation of the credibility of scientific models that represent natural entities and phenomena. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 571–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alloul, H. (2011). Introduction to the physics of electrons in solids. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bailer-Jones, D. (2003). When scientific models represent. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 17(1), 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Bamberger, Y. M., & Davis, E. A. (2013). Middle-school science students'scientific modelling performances across content areas and within a learning progression. International Journal of Science Education, 35(2), 213–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chabay, R., & Sherwood, B. (2006). Restructuring the introductory electricity and magnetism course. American Journal of Physics, 74(4), 329–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, M.-F., & Brown, D. E. (2010). Conceptual resources in self-developed explanatory models: The importance of integrating conscious and intuitive knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 32(17), 2367–2392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, M.-F., & Brown, D. E. (2015). The role of scientific modeling criteria in advancing students' explanatory ideas of magnetism. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Advance online publishing.doi:10.1002/tea.21234
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, M.-F., Lin, J.-L., Chang, Y.-C., Li, H.-W., Wu, T.-Y., & Lin, D.-M. (2014). Developing explanatory models of magnetic phenomena through model-based inquiry. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(3), 351–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou, G.-L., & Anderson, O. R. (2010). A study of undergraduate studentsunderstanding of heat conduction based on mental model theory and an ontologyprocessanalysis. Science Education, 94(5), 825–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chittleborough, G. D., Treagust, D. F., Mamiala, T. L., & Mocerino, M. (2005). Students’ perceptions of the role of models in the process of science and in the process of learning. Research in Science and Technological Education, 23(2), 195–212.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, J. J. (2008). Creative model construction in scientists and students: The role of analogy, imagery, and mental simulation. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, M. (2006). Learners’ responses to the demands of conceptual change: Considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Science & Education, 15(5), 463–494.
   Google Scholar
• Corpuz, E. D., & Rebello, N. S. (2011). Investigating students’ mental models and knowledge construction of microscopic friction. II. Implications for curriculum design and development. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 7(2), 020103-1–020103-8.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B., & Cullin, M. (2005). Dynamic assessments of pre-service teachers’ knowledge of models and modelling. In K. Boersma, H. Eijkelhof, M. Goedhart, & O. Jong (Eds.), Research and the quality of science education (pp. 309–323). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A., & Cullin, M. J. (2004). Supporting prospective teachers’ conceptions of modeling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1379–1401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, P., Hu, J., & Dagotto, E. (2012). Magnetism and its microscopic origin in iron-based high-temperature superconductors. Nature Physics, 8, 709–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, F., Chen, D.-T., Tsai, C.-C., & Chai, C. S. (2011). Students’ views of the nature of science: A critical review of research. Science Education, 95(6), 961–999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, L., Chabay, R., & Sherwood, B. (2013). How do students in an innovative principle-based mechanics course understand energy concepts? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(6), 722–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkan, C. (2004). Detection of single electronic spins by scanning tunnelingmicroscopy. Contemporary Physics, 45(1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: Scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, M. (2008). “Grasp of practice” as a reasoning resource for inquiry and nature of science understanding. Science & Education, 17(2–3), 147–177.
   Google Scholar
• Gobert, J., O'Dwyer, L., Horwitz, P., Buckley, B., Levy, S., & Wilensky, U. (2011). Examining the relationship between students’ understanding of the nature of models and conceptual learning in biology, physics, and chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 33(5), 653–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobert, J., & Pallant, A. (2004). Fostering students’ epistemologies of models via authentic model-basedtasks. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. L. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grünkorn, J., Upmeierzu Belzen, A., & Krüger, D. (2014). Assessing students’ understandings of biological models and their use in science to evaluate a theoretical Framework. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1651–1684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guisasola, J. (2014). Teaching and learning electricity: The relations between macroscopìc level observations and microscopic level theories. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 129–156). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Guisasola, J., Almudi, J., & Zubimendi, J. (2004). Difficulties in learning the introductory magnetic field theory in the first years of university. Science Education, 88(3), 443–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haglund, J., & Jeppsson, F. (2012). Using self-generated analogies in teaching of thermodynamics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 898–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halloun, I. A. (2004). Modeling theory in science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y.-S., Lin, L.-F., Wu, H.-F., Lee, D.-Y., & Hwang, F.-K. (2012). A novice-expert study of modeling skills and knowledge structures about air quality. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(5), 588–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. (1999). Students’ development of models of magnetic material, patterns of group activity, and social norms in a physics classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Kautz, C. H., Heron, P. R. L., Shaffer, P. S., & McDermott, L. C. (2005). Student understanding of the ideal gas law, Part II: A microscopic perspective. American Journal of Physics, 73(11), 1064–1071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. Y., & Irving, K. E. (2010). History of science as an instructional context: Student learning in genetics and nature of science. Science & Education, 19(2), 187–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krell, M., Reinisch, B., & Krüger, D. (2015). Analyzing students’ understanding of models and modeling referring to the disciplines biology, chemistry, and physics. Research in Science Education, 45(3), 367–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krell, M., Upmeierzu Belzen, A., & Krüger, D. (2014). Students’ levels of understanding models and modelling in biology: Global or aspect-dependent? Research in Science Education, 44(1),109–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Louca, L., & Zacharia, Z. (2012). Modeling-based learning in science education: cognitive, metacognitive, social, material and epistemological contributions. Educational Review, 64(1),471–492.
   Google Scholar
• Louca, T. L., Zacharia, Z., Michael, M., & Constantinou, P. C. (2011). Objects, entities, behaviors and interactions: A typology of student-constructed computer-based models of physical phenomena. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(2), 173–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machamer, P., Darden, D., & Craver, C. F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science educational standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: Achieve, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Nersessian, N. J. (2008). Creating scientific concepts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaou, C., & Constantinou, C. (2014). Assessment of the modeling competence: A systematic review and synthesis of empirical research. Educational Research Review, 13, 52–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, P. S., & Oh, S. J. (2011). What teachers of science need to know about models: An overview. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1109–1130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S.-K. (2013). The relationship between students’ perception of the scientific models and their alternative conceptions of the lunar phases. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(3), 285–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passmore, C., Stewart, J., & Cartier, J. (2009). Model-based inquiry and school science: Creating connections. School Science and Mathematics, 109(7), 392–402.
   Google Scholar
• Pluta, W. J., Chinn, C. A., & Duncan, R. G. (2011). Learners’ epistemic criteria for good scientific models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 486–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russ, R. S., Scherr, R. E., Hammer, D., & Mikeska, J. (2008). Recognizing mechanistic reasoning in student scientific inquiry: A framework for discourse analysis developed from philosophy of science. Science Education, 92(3), 499–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A. (2015). Epistemic goals. In R. Gundstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 393–398). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B., Acher, A., Kenyon, L., & Fortus, D. (2012). MoDeLS: Challenges in defining a learning progression for scientific modeling. In A. Alonzo & A. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions (pp. 101–137). Boston: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., … Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. V., & White, B. Y. (2005). Metamodeling knowledge: Developing students’ understanding of scientific modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 165–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sederberg, D. (2012). Middle school students’ mental models of magnets and magnetism (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Seker, H. & Welch, L. C. (2006). The use of history of mechanics in teaching motion and force units. Science & Education, 15(1), 55–89.
   Google Scholar
• Seroglou, F., Koumaras, P., & Tselfes, V. (1998). History of science and instructional design: The case of electromagnetism. Science & Education, 7(2), 261–280.
   Google Scholar
• Sins, P. H. M., Savelsbergh, E. R., van Joolingen, W., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2009). The relation between students’ epistemological understanding of computer models and their cognitive processing in a modeling task. International Journal of Science Education, 31(9), 1205–1229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students’ views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 761–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stathopoulou, C., & Vosniadou, S. (2007). Exploring the relationship between physics-related epistemological beliefs and physics understanding. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 255–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J., Cartier, J. L., & Passmore, C. M. (2005). Developing understanding through model-based inquiry. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn history, mathematics, and science (pp. 515–565). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira, E. S., Greca, I. M., & Freire, O. (2012). The history and philosophy of science in physics teaching: A research synthesis of didactic interventions. Science & Education, 21(6), 771–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thacker, B. A., Ganiel, U., & Boys, D. (1999). Macroscopic phenomena and microscopic processes: Student understandingof transients in direct current electric circuits. American Journal of Physics, 67(7), 525–531.
   Google Scholar
• Treagust, D., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. (2002). Students’ understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 357–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treagust, D., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. (2004). Students’ understanding of the descriptive and predictive nature of teaching models in organic chemistry. Research in Science Education, 34, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voutsina, L., & Ravanis, K. (2011). History of physics and conceptual constructions: The case of magnetism. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 4(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G., & Clement, J. (2015). Identifying multiple levels of discussion-based teaching strategies for constructing scientific models. International Journal of Science Education, 37(1), 82–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). How novice science teachers appropriate epistemic discourses around model-based inquiry for use in classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 310–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar