An Analysis of Data Activities and Instructional Supports in Middle School Science Textbooks

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Rutherford's enlarged: A content-embedded activity to teach about nature of science. Physics Education, 37(1), 64–68. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/37/1/309
   Google Scholar
• Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26(2), 147–179. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2602_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrick, H. P. (1979). Maintenance of knowledge: Questions about memory we forgot to ask. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108(3), 296–308. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.108.3.296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1990). Domain-specific principles affect learning and transfer in children. Cognitive Science, 14(1), 107–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryce, N. (2011). Meeting the reading challenges of science textbooks in the primary grades. The Reading Teacher, 64(7), 474–485. doi: 10.1598/RT.64.7.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budiansky, S. (2001, February). The trouble with textbooks. Prism, 24–27. Retrieved from http://www.project2061.org/publications/articles/articles/asee.htm
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., & Cepeda, N. J. (2009). Using tests to enhance 8th grade students’ retention of US history facts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(6), 760–771. doi: 10.1002/acp.1507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 145–182. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1–49. doi: 10.3102/00346543063001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175–218. doi: 10.1002/sce.10001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. doi: 10.1177/1529100612453266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, R. H., & Treagust, D. F. (2012). Conceptual change: Still a powerful framework for improving the practice of science instruction. In C. D. T. Kim & M. Kim (Eds.), Issues and challenges in science education research (pp. 43–54). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science in science education: Scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hassard, J., & Dias, M. (2013). The art of teaching science: Inquiry and innovation in middle school and high school. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hewson, M. G., & Hewson, P. W. (1983). Effect of instruction using students’ prior knowledge and conceptual change strategies on science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(8), 731–743. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660200804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodds, M., Alcock, L., & Inglis, M. (2014). Self-explanation training improves proof comprehension. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(1), 62–101. doi: 10.5951/jresematheduc.45.1.0062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., American Problem Series.
   Google Scholar
• Kesidou, S., & Roseman, J. E. (2002). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 522–549. doi: 10.1002/tea.10035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koslowski, B. (1996). Theory and evidence: The development of scientific reasoning. Boston: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education, 94(5), 810–824. doi: 10.1002/sce.20395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1998). Reasoning about structure and function: Children's conceptions of gears. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(1), 3–25. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199801)35:1<3::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masnick, A. M., & Morris, B. J. (2008). Investigating the development of data evaluation: The role of data characteristics. Child development, 79(4), 1032–1048. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01174.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M. (2008). Limitations to teaching children 2+2=4: Typical arithmetic problems can hinder learning of mathematical equivalence. Child Development, 79(5), 1524–1537. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01203.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. doi: 10.1002/tea.20347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, B. J., Croker, S., Masnick, A. M., & Zimmerman, C. (2012). The emergence of scientific reasoning. In H. Kloos, B. J. Morris, & J. L. Amaral (Eds.), Current topics in children’s learning and cognition (pp. 61–82). Rijeka, Croatia: InTech.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Minnich, C. A., Stanco, G. M., Arora, A., Centurino, V. A., & Castle, C. E. (Eds). (2012). TIMSS 2011 encyclopedia: Education policy and curriculum in mathematics and science (Vol. 1). Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nokes-Malach, T. J., VanLehn, K., Belenky, D. M., Lichtenstein, M., & Cox, G. (2013). Coordinating principles and examples through analogy and self-explanation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(4), 1237–1263. doi: 10.1007/s10212-012-0164-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, D., & Lavonen, J. (2013). An analysis of standards-based high school physics textbooks of Finland and the United States. In M.S. Khine (Ed.), Critical analysis of science textbooks: Evaluating instructional effectiveness (pp. 219–238). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2013). Interleaved practice in multi-dimensional learning tasks: Which dimension should we interleave? Learning and Instruction, 23, 98–114. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renkl, A., Stark, R., Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (1998). Learning from worked-out examples: The effects of example variability and elicited self-explanations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(1), 90–108. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1997.0959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B. (2006). Promoting transfer: Effects of self-explanation and direct instruction. Child Development, 77(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00852.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrer, D. (2009). The effects of spacing and mixing practice problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40, 4–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez, G., & Valcarcel, M. V. (1999). Science teachers’ views and practices in planning for teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4), 493–513. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199904)36:4<493::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweingruber, H. A., & Fenichel, M. (2010). Surrounded by science: Learning science in informal environments. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5(2), 179–187.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, A. L. (2011). Distributed practice and procedural memory consolidation in musicians’ skill learning. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59(4), 357–368. doi: 10.1177/0022429411424798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slough, S. W., McTigue, E. M., Kim, S., & Jennings, S. K. (2010). Science textbooks’ use of graphical representation: A descriptive analysis of four sixth grade science texts. Reading Psychology, 31(3), 301–325. doi:10.1080/02702710903256502
   Google Scholar
• Son, L. K., & Simon, D. A. (2012). Distributed learning: Data, metacognition, and educational implications. Educational Psychology Review, 24(3), 379–399. doi: 10.1007/s10648-012-9206-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stansfield, W. D. (2006). Textbooks: Expectations vs. reality: The DNA story. The American Biology Teacher, 68(8), 464–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, L., & Roseman, J. (2004). Can middle-school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum evaluation study: Life Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 538–568. doi: 10.1002/tea.20019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2(1), 59–89. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0201_3
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K., & Rohrer, D. (2010). The effects of interleaved practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 837–848. doi:10.1002/acp.1598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toth, E., Klahr, D., & Chen, Z. (2000). Bridging research and practice: A cognitively based classroom intervention for teaching experimentation skills to elementary school children. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 423–459. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI1804_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricot, A., & Sweller, J. (2014). Domain-specific knowledge and why teaching generic skills does not work. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 265–283. doi: 10.1007/s10648-013-9243-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlach, H. A., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2012). Distributing learning over time: The spacing effect in children's acquisition and generalization of science concepts. Child Development, 83(4), 1137–1144. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01781.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlach, H. A., Sandhofer, C. M., & Kornell, N. (2008). The spacing effect in young children’s memory and category induction. Cognition, 109, 163–167. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, M., & Sweller, J. (1990). Structuring effective worked examples. Cognition and Instruction, 7(1), 1–39. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0701_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172–223. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar