‘I Don't Even Have Time to be Their Friend!’ Ethical Dilemmas in Ph.D. Supervision in the Hard Sciences

References

• Ahlberg, A. (2008). Teaching and learning in hard science research environments: Views of academics and educational developers. Higher Education Research and Development, 27(2), 133–142. doi: 10.1080/07294360701805275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfredo, K., & Hart, H. (2011). The university and the responsible conduct of research: Who is responsible for what? Science and Engineering Ethics, 17, 447–457. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9217-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. S., & Swazey, J. P. (1998). Reflections on the graduate student experience: An overview. New Directions for Higher Education, 101, 3–13. doi: 10.1002/he.10101
   Google Scholar
• Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94–122. doi: 10.1353/jhe.2002.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Case, J. (2008). Alienation and engagement: Development of an alternative theoretical framework for understanding student learning. Higher Education, 55, 321–332. doi: 10.1007/s10734-007-9057-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuchar, R. (2008). Facilitator, director, or critical friend? Contradiction and congruence in doctoral supervisory styles. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(4), 489–500. doi: 10.1080/13562510802193905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, A., Divoll, K. A., & Rogan-Klyve, A. (2009). Research education of new scientists: Implications for science teacher education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(4), 442–459. doi: 10.1002/tea.20285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, A., Divoll, K. A., & Rogan-Klyve, A. (2013). Becoming researchers: The participation of undergraduate and graduate students in scientific research groups. Science Education, 97(2), 218–243. doi: 10.1002/sce.21051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity. (2012). Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations for misconduct in Finland. Retrieved November 6, 2014, from http://www.tenk.fi/sites/tenk.fi/files/HTK_ohje_2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. (2007). ‘I heard it through the grapevine’: Doctoral student socialization in chemistry and history. Higher Education, 54, 723–740. doi: 10.1007/s10734-006-9020-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. K. (2009). Student and faculty attributions of attrition in high and low-completing doctoral programs in the United States. Higher Education, 58, 97–112. doi: 10.1007/s10734-008-9184-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golde, C. M., Bueschell, A. C., Jones, L., & Walker, G. E. (2009). Advocating apprenticeship and intellectual community: Lessons from the Carnegie Initiative on the Doctorate. In R. G. Ehrenberg & C. V. Kuh (Eds.), Doctoral education and the faculty of the future (pp. 53–64). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, P. W., & Jordan, S. R. (2012). Supervisors and academic integrity: Supervisors as exemplars and mentors. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10, 299–311. doi: 10.1007/s10805-012-9155-6
   Google Scholar
• Green, R. (2006). Fostering a community of doctoral learners. Journal of Library Administration, 45(1–2), 169–183. doi: 10.1300/J111v45n01_09
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, R. K., Crego, C. A., & Johnston, M. W. (1992). Ethical issues in the supervision of student research: A study of critical incidents. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23, 203–210. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.23.3.203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, K., Wirnes, S., Keskinen, J., Pohjola, P., Paavola, S., Lonka, K., & Pyhältö, K. (2014). On personal and collective dimensions of agency in doctoral training: Medicine and natural science programs. Studies in Continuing Education, 36(1), 83–100. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2013.787982
   Google Scholar
• Halse, C. (2011). ‘Becoming a supervisor’: The impact of doctoral supervision on supervisors’ learning. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 557–570. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.594593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockey, J. (1996). A contractual solution to problems in the supervision of Ph.D. degrees in the UK. Studies in Higher Education, 21, 359–371. doi: 10.1080/03075079612331381271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, N. (2010). Doctoral experience and learning from a sociocultural perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 829–843. doi: 10.1080/03075070903348412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist. The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91, 36–74. doi: 10.1002/sce.20173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyun, J., Quinn, B., Madon, T., & Lustig, S. (2007). Mental health need, awareness, and use of counseling services among international graduate students. Journal of the American College of Health, 56, 109–118. doi: 10.3200/JACH.56.2.109-118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchener, K. S. (1985). Ethical principles and ethical decisions in student affairs. In H. J. Canon & R. D. Brown (Eds.), New directions for student services: Applied ethics in student services (pp. 17–29). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kligyte, V., Marcy, R. T., Sevier, S. T., Godfrey, E. S., & Mumford, M. D. (2008). A qualitative approach to responsible conduct of research (RCR) training development: Identification of metacognitive strategies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 3–31. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9035-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz-Costes, B., Helmke, A. L., & Ülkü-Steiner, B. (2006). Gender and doctoral studies: The perceptions of PhD students in an American university. Gender & Education, 18, 137–155. doi: 10.1080/09540250500380513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Roth, W. (2003). Becoming and belonging: Learning qualitative research through legitimate peripheral participation. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(2). Retrieved November 13, 2012, from www.qualitativeresearch.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/708/1534%26sa%3DU%26ei%3DmZW7
   Google Scholar
• Löfström, E., & Pyhältö, K. (2012). The supervisory relationship as an arena for ethical problem-solving. Education Research International, 2012, 1–12. doi:10.1155/2012/961505
   Google Scholar
• Löfström, E., & Pyhältö, K. (2014). Ethical issues in doctoral supervision – The perspectives of PhD students in the natural and behavioural sciences. Ethics & Behavior, 24(3), 195–214. doi:10.1080/10508422.2013.830574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfström, E., & Pyhältö, K. (2015). Supervision from an ethical perspective: Supervisors’ and doctoral students’ ethical dilemmas in the natural and behavioural sciences. Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1045475
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1995). Designing qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mathur, R., & Offenbach, S. I. (2002). Preliminary observations on faculty and graduate student perceptions of questionable research conduct. In N. H. Steneck & M. D. Scheetz (Eds.), Investigating research integrity: Proceedings of the first ORI research conference on research integrity (pp. 35–40). Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity, Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved November 5, 2014, from http://ori.dhhs.gov/documents/proceedings_rri.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., Jazvac-Martek, M., & Hopwood, N. (2009). Doctoral student experience in education: Activities and difficulties influencing identity development. International Journal for Researcher Development, 1(1), 97–109. doi: 10.1108/1759751X201100007
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. L. (1993). Faculty responses to academic dishonesty: Honour codes and other contextual influences. Research in Higher Education, 34, 647–658. doi: 10.1007/BF00991924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., Shanahan, M. P., & Laugksch, R. C. (2005). Students’ conceptions of research. I: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 225–244. doi: 10.1080/00313830500109535
   Google Scholar
• Nersessian, N. J. (2006). The cognitive-cultural systems of the research laboratory. Organization Studies, 27(1), 125–145. doi: 10.1177/0170840606061842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, V., Tobbell, J., Lawthom, R., & Zammit, M. (2009). Transition to postgraduate study: Practice, participation and the widening participation agenda. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10, 26–40. doi: 10.1177/1469787408100193
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2009). Developing scholarly communities as learning environments for doctoral students. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(3), 221–232. doi: 10.1080/13601440903106551
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., in collaboration Stubb, J., & Tuomainen, J. (2011). International evaluation of research and doctoral education at the University of Helsinki – To the top and out to society. Summary Report on Doctoral Students’ and Principal Investigators’ Doctoral Training Experiences. Retrieved May 23, 2012, from http://wiki.helsinki.fi/display/evaluation2011/Survey+on+doctoral+training
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Vekkaila, J., & Keskinen, J. (2015). Fit matters in the supervisory relationship: Doctoral students and supervisors perceptions about the supervisory activities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(1), 4–16. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2014.981836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubb, J. 2012. Becoming a scholar. The dynamic interaction between the doctoral student and the scholarly community (Research Report 336). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Tobbell, J., O'Donnell, V., & Zammit, M. (2010). Exploring transition to postgraduate study: Shifting identities in interaction with communities, practice and participation. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 261–278. doi: 10.1080/01411920902836360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15, 398–405. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehviläinen, S., & Löfström, E. (2014). ‘I wish I had a crystal ball’: Discourses and potentials for developing academic supervising. Studies in Higher Education. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.942272
   Google Scholar
• Weidman, J. C., & Stein, E. L. (2003). Socialization of doctoral students to academic norms. Research in Higher Education, 44(6), 641–656. doi: 10.1023/A:1026123508335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar