Children's Reasoning as Collective Social Action through Problem Solving in Grade 2/3 Science Classrooms

References

• Akkerman, S., Van den Bossche, P., Admiraal, W., Gijselaers, W., Segers, M., Simons, R.-J., & Kirschner, P. (2007). Reconsidering group cognition: From conceptual confusion to a boundary area between cognitive and socio-cultural perspectives? Educational Research Review, 2(1), 39–63. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2007.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 139(4), 544–559.
   Google Scholar
• Berland, L., & Lee, V. (2012). In pursuit of consensus: Disagreement and legitimization during small-group argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1857–1882. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.645086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A.-M., Anderson, R., Kuo, L.-J., Kim, I.-H., Anthi Archodidou, A., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2003). Collaborative reasoning: Expanding ways for children to talk and think in school. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 181–198. doi: 10.1023/A:1023429215151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croker, S., & Buchanan, H. (2011). Scientific reasoning in a real-world context: The effect of prior belief and outcome on children's hypothesis-testing strategies. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(3), 409–424. doi: 10.1348/026151010X496906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1997). Young people's images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duch, B., Groh, S., & Allen, D. (2001). Why problem-based learning: A case study of institutional change in undergraduate education. In B. Duch, S. Groh., & D. Allen (Eds.), The power of problem-based learning (pp. 3–12). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Eberbach, C., & Crowley, K. (2008). From everyday to scientific observation: How children learn to observe the biologist's world. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 39–69. doi: 10.3102/0034654308325899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshach, H. (2010). An analysis of conceptual flow patterns and structures in the physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 32(4): 451–477. doi: 10.1080/09500690802635247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 454–459. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., & Stanovich, K. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulart, M., & Roth, W.-M. (2009). Engaging young children in collective curriculum design. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 533–562. doi: 10.1007/s11422-009-9196-3
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition & Instruction, 26(1), 48–94. doi: 10.1080/07370000701798495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, M., & Borenstein, J. (2014). Understanding ill-structured engineering ethics problems through a collaborative learning and argument visualization approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20, 261–276. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9430-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (2007). The state of collaborative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 15–29. doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9038-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39–103. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kelson, A., & Distlehorst, L. (2000). Groups in problem-based learning (PBL): Essential elements in theory and practice. In D. H. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 167–184). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M., & Tan, H.-T. (2013). A collaborative problem solving through environmental field studies. International Journal of Science Education, 35(3), 357–387. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.752116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual-space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12(1), 1–48. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1201_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koslowski, B., & Masnick, A. (2011). Causal reasoning and explanation. In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 377–398). Oxford: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96(4), 674–689. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Pearsall, S. (2000). Developmental origins of scientific thinking. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 113–129. doi: 10.1207/S15327647JCD0101N_11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2011). What is scientific thinking and how does it develop? In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 497–523). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, A. (2004). The nature and development of scientific reasoning: A synthetic view. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 307–338. doi: 10.1007/s10763-004-3224-2
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Duek, E. (2000). Whose group is it, anyway? Equity of student discourse in problem-based learning (PBL). In D. H. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 75–108). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Macagno, F., & Konstantinidou, A. (2013). What students’ arguments can tell us: Using argumentation schemes in science education. Argumentation, 27, 225–243. doi: 10.1007/s10503-012-9284-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2008). The seeds of time: Why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 33–59. doi: 10.1080/10508400701793182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 359–377. doi: 10.1080/01411920410001689689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, H. (2011). Reasoning serves argumentation in children. Cognitive Development, 26(3), 177–191. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, K. (2011). Young children can be sophisticated scientists. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(8), 68–71. doi: 10.1177/003172171109200815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J., Du, X., & Kolmos, A. (2010). Innovative application of a new PBL model to interdisciplinary and intercultural projects. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 47(2), 174–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piekny, J., & Maehler, C. (2013). Scientific reasoning in early and middle childhood: The development of domain-general evidence evaluation, experimentation, and hypothesis generation skills. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31(2), 153–179. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2012.02082.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polk, M., & Knutsson, P. (2008). Participation, value rationality and mutual learning in transdisciplinary knowledge production for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 14(6), 643–653. doi: 10.1080/13504620802464841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psaltis, C., Duveen, G., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2009). The social and the psychological: Structure and context in intellectual development. Human Development, 52(5), 291–312. doi: 10.1159/000233261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramadier, T. (2004). Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: The case of urban studies. Futures, 36(4), 423–439. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M. (2013). An integrated theory of thinking and speaking that draws on Vygotsky and Bakhtin/Vološinov. Dialogical Pedagogy, 1, 32–53.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., & Radford, L. (2010). Re/thinking the zone of proximal development (symmetrically). Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17, 299–307. doi: 10.1080/10749031003775038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, L. E., Goodman, N., Tenenbaum, J., & Jenkins, A. (2008). Going beyond the evidence: Abstract laws and preschoolers’ responses to anomalous data. Cognition, 109, 211–223. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. L., Carey, S., & Wiser, M. (1985). On differentiation: A case study of the development of the concept of size, weight, and density. Cognition, 21(3), 177–237. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90025-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taconis, R., Ferguson-Hessler, M., & Broekkamp, H. (2001). Teaching science problem solving: An overview of experimental work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 442–468. doi: 10.1002/tea.1013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolmie, A., Keith, J., Topping, K., Christie, D., Donaldson, C., Howe, C., & Thurston, A. (2010). Social effects of collaborative learning in primary schools. Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 177–191. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (2002). Learning and teaching for understanding: The key role of collaborative knowledge building. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Social constructivist teaching: Affordances and constraints (pp. 1–42). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44. doi: 10.1080/10508400802581676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172–223. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zittoun, T., Baucal, A., Cornish, F., & Gillespie, A. (2007). Collaborative research, knowledge and emergence. Integrative Psychological & Behavioural Science, 41(2), 208–217. doi: 10.1007/s12124-007-9021-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar