Interest in science: a RIASEC-based analysis of students’ interests

References

• Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). A cultural perspective on the structure of student interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 51–71. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.518640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, C. & Eder, F. (1992). Allgemeiner Interessen-Struktur-Test/Umwelt-Struktur-Test (AIST/UST) [General interest-structure-test/environment-structure-test]. Weinheim: Beltz. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.518640
   Google Scholar
• Blankenburg, J., Höffler, T., & Parchmann, I. (2015). Fostering today what is needed tomorrow: Investigating students’ interests in science. Science Education. doi:10.1002/sce.21204
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, M., Nagy, G., & Wilhelm, O. (2012). A tutorial on hierarchically structured constructs. Journal of Personality, 80(4), 796–846. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00749.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (2006). Scientific inquiry and science teaching. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color. Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. doi: 10.1002/tea.20237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierks, P. O., Höffler, T., & Parchmann, I. (2014). Profiling interest of students in science: Learning in school and beyond. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(2), 97–114. doi:10.1080./02635143.2014.895712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eid, M., & Diener, E. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, A. X., Campbell, J. R., & Verna, M. A. (2005). Understanding gender inequity in America: Interviews with academic Olympians. Journal of Research in Education, 12, 93–100.
   Google Scholar
• Fulmer, G. W. (2014). Undergraduates’ attitudes towards science and their epistemological beliefs: Positive effects of certainty and authority beliefs. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 198–206. doi: 10.1007/s10956-013-9463-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. L. (1996). Students’ interests in science and technology: Gender age and other factors. Paper presented at the international conference on interest and gender. Issues of development and change in learning, Seeon, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Glowinski, I. (2007). Schülerlabore im Bereich Molekularbiologie als Interesse fördernde Lernumgebungen [Student labs in molecular biology as interest fostering environment]. Kiel: University of Kiel.
   Google Scholar
• Glowinski, I., & Bayrhuber, H. (2011). Student labs on a university campus as a type of out-of-school learning environment: Assessing the potential to promote students’ interest in science. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6(4), 371–392.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, S., Mayfield-Stewart, C., Bateman, H., & Pellegrino, J. (1998). Environments that support meaningful learning. In L. Hoffman, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon conference on interest and gender (pp. 184–196). Kiel: IPN.
   Google Scholar
• Gräber, W. (1992). Interesse am Unterrichtsfach Chemie, an Inhalten und Tätigkeiten [Interest in chemistry as school subject, in contents, and activities]. Chemie in der Schule, 39, 354–358.
   Google Scholar
• Hannover, B. (1991). Zur Unterrepräsentanz von Mädchen in Naturwissenschaften und Technik: Psychologische Prädiktoren der Fach- und Berufswahl [About girls‘ minor representation in science and technology: Psychological predictors of subject and career choice]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 5, 169–186.
   Google Scholar
• Häußler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (2000). A curricular frame for physics education: Development comparison with students’ interests, and impact on students’ achievement and self-concept. Science Education, 84, 689–705. doi: 10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<689::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häußler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (2002). An intervention study to enhance girls’ interest, self-concept, and achievement in physics classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 870–888. doi: 10.1002/tea.10048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häußler, P., Hoffmann, L., Langeheine, R., Rost, J., & Sievers, K. (1998). A typology of students’ interests in physics and the distribution of gender and age within each type. International Journal of Science Education, 20(2), 223–238. doi: 10.1080/0950069980200207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M.-C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmke, A., & van Aken, M. (1995). The causal ordering of academic achievement and self-concept of ability during elementary school: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 624–637. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.87.4.624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549–571. doi: 10.3102/00346543060004549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 69–82. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2006.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational construct that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In D. Dai & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 89–115). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A. (2004). The laboratory in chemistry education: Thirty years of experience with developments, implementation, and research. Chemistry Education, 5, 247–264.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 201–217. doi: 10.3102/00346543052002201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. doi:10.1002/sce.10106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Edessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Holstermann, N., & Bögeholz, S. (2007). Interesse von Jungen und Mädchen an naturwissenschaftlichen Themen am Ende der Sekundarstufe I [Boys‘ and girls‘ interest in science topics at the end of junior high school]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 13, 71–86.
   Google Scholar
• Jack, B. M., Lin, H. S., & Yore, L. D. (2014). The synergistic effect of affective factors on student learning outcomes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(8), 1084–1101. doi:10.1002/tea.21153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., Howe, A., & Rua, M. J. (2000). Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84(2), 180–192. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<180::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessels, U., Rau, M., & Hannover, B. (2006). What goes well with physics? Measuring and altering the image of science. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 761–780. doi: 10.1348/000709905X59961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köller, O. (2004). Konsequenzen von Leistungsgruppierungen [Consequences of achievement-based classifications]. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Köller, O., Schnabel, K. U., & Baumert, J. (2000). Der Einfluss der Leistungsstärke von Schulen auf das fachspezifische Selbstkonzept der Begabung und das Interesse [The influence of schools’ performance on the domain-specific self-concept and interest]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 32(2), 70–80. doi: 10.1026//0049-8637.32.2.70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapp, A. (1997). Selbstkonzept und Leistung: Dynamik ihres Zusammenspiels [Self-concept and performance: The dynamics of their interaction]. In F. E. Weinert & A. Helmke (Eds.), Entwicklung im Grundschulalter (pp. 325–339). Weinheim: Beltz PVU.
   Google Scholar
• Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383–409. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapp, A. (2003). Interest and human development: An educational–psychological perspective. In L. Smith, C. Rogers, & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), Development and Motivation: BJEP Monograph Series, Series II(2) (pp. 57–84). Leicester: The British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning and development. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3–26). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27–50. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.518645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengfelder, A., & Heller, K. (2005). German Olympiad Studies: Findings from a retrospective evaluation and from in-depth interviews. Where have all the gifted females gone? Journal of Research in Education, 12, 86–92.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, G., & Friege, G. (2004). The personality of a successful PhO-participant: An investigation among former participants of the German Physics Olympiad. Physics Competitions, 6(1), 81–89.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 471–491. doi:10.1037/a0019227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masnick, A. M., Valenti, S. S., Cox, B. D., & Osman, C. J. (2010). A multidimensional scaling analysis of students’ attitudes about science careers. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 653–667. doi: 10.1080/09500690902759053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, G., Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2010). The structure of vocational interests in Germany: Different methodologies, different conclusions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(2), 153–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2007.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prenzel, M., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Hammann, M., Klieme, E., & Pekrun, R. (Eds.) (2007). PISA 2006. Die Ergebnisse der dritten internationalen Vergleichsstudie [PISA 2006. Results of the third international comparative study]. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 375–407). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. A. (1982). Developing the concept of “curriculum emphases” in science education. Science Education, 66(2), 243–260. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730660209
   Google Scholar
• Rounds, J., & Tracey, T. J. (1993). Prediger's dimensional representation of Holland's RIASEC circumplex. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 875–890. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.6.875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 197–222). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 23–52. doi: 10.1023/A:1009004801455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevian, H., & Talanquer, V. (2014). Rethinking chemistry: A learning progression on chemical thinking. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(1), 10–23. doi: 10.1039/C3RP00111C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441. doi: 10.3102/00346543046003407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332. doi: 10.1080/00220670209596607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, S., & Imsen, G. (1988). Gender and science education I. In P. Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education (pp. 218–248). Bristol: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE project—An overview and key findings. Retrieved from http://roseproject.no/network/countries/norway/eng/nor-Sjoberg-Schreiner-overview-2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Swarat, S., Ortony, A., & Revelle, W. (2012). Activity matters: Understanding student interest in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 515–537. doi: 10.1002/tea.21010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valsiner, J. (1992). Interest: A metatheoretical perspective. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 27–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2011). Adolescents’ declining motivation to learn science: Inevitable or not? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 199–216. doi: 10.1002/tea.20398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2012). Adolescents’ declining motivation to learn science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1057–1095. doi: 10.1002/tea.21049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vock, M., Köller, O., & Nagy, G. (2013). Vocational interests of intellectually gifted and highly achieving young adults. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 305–328. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02063.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddington, D. J., Nentwig, P., & Schanze, S. (Eds.) (2007). Making it comparable. Standards in science education. Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes towards science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 387–398. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660320407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentorf, W., Höffler, T., & Parchmann, I. (2015). Schülerkonzepte über das Tätigkeitsspektrum von Naturwissenschaftlerinnen und Naturwissenschaftlern: Vorstellungen korrespondierende Interessen und Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen [Students’ concepts about scientists’ activities: Views, corresponding interests and self-efficacy]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 21(1), 207–222. doi:10.1007/s40573-015-0035-7
   Google Scholar