2,489
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Learning in Earth and space science: a review of conceptual change instructional approaches

, &
Pages 767-790 | Received 01 Aug 2015, Accepted 10 Feb 2016, Published online: 24 Mar 2016

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2015). Topic: Plate tectonics. Retrieved February 28, 2015, from http://assessment.aaas.org/topics/PT#/
  • Andre, T., & Windschitl, M. (2003). Interest, epistemological belief, and intentional conceptual change. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 173–193). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2013). Science curriculum. Retrieved March 31, 2015, from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/science/curriculum/f-10?layout=1
  • Bakas, C., & Mikropoulos, T. (2003). Design of virtual environments for the comprehension of planetary phenomena based on students’ ideas. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 949–967. *
  • Barnett, M., & Morran, J. (2002). Assessing children's alternative frameworks of the moon's phases and eclipses. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 859–879. *
  • Barnett, M., Wagner, H., Gatling, A., Anderson, J., Houle, M., & Kafka, A. (2006). The impact of science fiction film on student understanding of science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(2), 179–191.
  • Baxter, J. (1989). Children's understanding of familiar astronomical events. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 502–513.
  • Bell, R., & Trundle, K. (2008). The use of a computer simulation to promote scientific conceptions of moon phases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 346–372. *
  • Betzner, J., & Marek, E. (2014). Teacher and student perceptions of earth science and its educational value in secondary schools. Creative Education, 5(11), 1019–1031.
  • Bezzi, A. (1996). Use of repertory grids in facilitating knowledge construction and reconstruction in geology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(2), 179–204. *
  • Binns, I., Bell, R., & Smetana, L. (2010). Using technology to promote conceptual change in secondary earth science pupils’ understanding of moon phases. Journal of the Research Centre for Educational Technology, 6(2), 112–129. *
  • Blake, A. (2001). Developing young children's understanding: An example from earth science. Evaluation & Research in Education, 15(3), 154–163. *
  • Blake, A. (2004). Helping young children to see what is relevant and why: Supporting cognitive change in earth science using analogy. International Journal of Science Education, 26(15), 1855–1873. *
  • Blown, E., & Bryce, T. (2006). Knowledge restructuring in the development of children's cosmologies. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1411–1462.
  • Broughton, S., Sinatra, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2013). “Pluto has been a planet my whole life!” Emotions, attitudes, and conceptual change in elementary students’ learning about Pluto's reclassification. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 529–550. *
  • Broughton, S., Sinatra, G., & Reynolds, R. (2010). The nature of the refutation text effect: An investigation of attention allocation. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(6), 407–423. *
  • Bulunuz, N., & Jarrett, O. (2010). The effect of hands-on learning stations building American elementary teachers’ understanding about earth and space science concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 6(2), 85–99. *
  • Caravita, S., & Hallden, O. (1994). Re-framing the problem of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 89–111.
  • Celikten, O., Ipekciouglu, S., Ertepinar, H., & Geban, O. (2012). The effect of conceptual change oriented instruction through cooperative learning on 4th grade students’ understanding of earth and sky concepts. Science Education International, 23(1), 84–96. *
  • Chang, C., & Barufaldi, J. (1999). The use of a problem-solving-based instructional model in initiating change in students’ achievement and alternative frameworks. International Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 373–388. *
  • Chang, H., Quintana, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). The impact of designing and evaluating molecular animations on how well middle school students understand the particulate nature of matter. Science Education, 94(1), 73–94.
  • Chastenay, P. (2016). From geocentrism to allocentrism: Teaching the phases of the moon in a digital full-dome planetarium. Research in Science Education, 46(1), 43–77. *
  • Cheek, K. (2010). Commentary: A summary and analysis of twenty-seven years of geoscience conceptions research. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58(3), 122–134.
  • Chi, M., Slotta, J., & De Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 27–43.
  • Cobern, W. (1994). Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education. Science Education, 80(5), 579–610.
  • Cordova, J., Sinatra, G., Jones, S., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Lombardi, D. (2014). Confidence in prior knowledge, self-efficacy, interest, and prior knowledge: Influences on conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 164–174. *
  • Coştu, B., Ayas, A., & Niaz, M. (2010). Promoting conceptual change in first year students’ understanding of evaporation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11, 5–16.
  • Dahl, J., Anderson, S., & Libarkin, J. (2005). Digging into earth science: Alternative conceptions held by K-12 teachers. Journal of Science Education, 12, 65–68.
  • Dawson, V., & Carson, K. (2013). Science teachers’ and senior secondary schools students’ perceptions of earth and environmental science topics. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 29, 202–220.
  • Dawson, V., & Moore, L. (2011). Teachers’ perspectives of the new earth and environmental science course: Lessons from the Australian curriculum. Teaching Science, 57(1), 19–27.
  • Diakidoy, I., & Kendeou, P. (2001). Facilitating conceptual change in astronomy: A comparison of the effectiveness of two instructional approaches. Learning and Instruction, 11(1), 1–20. *
  • Dodick, J., & Orion, N. (2003). Cognitive factors affecting student understanding of geologic time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 415–442.
  • Dole, J., & Sinatra, G. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 109–128.
  • Duit, R., & Treagust, D. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688.
  • Duit, R., Widodo, A., & Wodzinski, C. (2007). Conceptual change ideas – Teachers’ views and their instructional practice. In S. Vosnaidou, A. Baltas, & X. Vamvokoussi (Eds.), Re-framing the problem of conceptual change learning and instruction (pp. 197–217). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Francek, M. (2013). A compilation and review of over 500 geoscience misconceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 35(1), 31–64.
  • Gazit, E., Yair, Y., & Chen, D. (2005). Emerging conceptual understanding of complex astronomical phenomena by using a virtual solar system. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(5), 459–470. *
  • Gobert, J., & Clement, J. (1999). Effects of student-generated diagrams versus student-generated summaries on conceptual understanding of causal and dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 39–53.
  • Hayes, B., Goodhew, A., Heit, E., & Gillan, J. (2003). The role of diverse instruction in conceptual change. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86(4), 253–276. *
  • Hewson, P. (1981). A conceptual change approach to learning science. European Journal of Science Education, 3(4), 383–396.
  • Hoban, G., Loughran, J., & Nielsen, W. (2011). Slowmation: Preservice elementary teachers representing science knowledge through creating multimodal digital animations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(9), 985–1009.
  • Hoban, G., & Nielsen, W. (2012). Using “slowmation” to enable preservice primary teachers to create multimodal representations of science concepts. Research in Science Education, 42(6), 1101–1119.
  • Hobson, S., Trundle, K., & Saçkes, M. (2010). Using a planetarium software to promote conceptual change with young children. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(2), 165–176. *
  • Hsu, Y. (2008). Learning about seasons in a technologically enhanced environment: The impact of teacher-guided and student-centered instructional approaches on the process of students’ conceptual change. Science Education, 92(2), 320–344. *
  • Hubscher-Younger, T., & Narayanan, N. H. (2007). Turning the tables: Investigating characteristics and efficacy of student-authored multimedia representations. In R. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animations (pp. 235–262). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jenkins, E. (2000). The impact of The National curriculum on secondary school science teaching in England and Wales. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 325–336.
  • Kali, Y., Orion, N., & Eylon, B. (2003). Effect of knowledge integration activities on students’ perceptions of the earth's crust as a cyclic system. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(6), 545–565. *
  • Keating, T., Barnett, M., Barab, S., & Hay, K. (2002). The virtual solar system project: Developing conceptual understanding of astronomical concepts through building three-dimensional computational models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(3), 261–275. *
  • King, C. (2001). The response of teachers to new subject areas in a national science curriculum: The case of the earth science component. Science Education, 85(6), 636–664.
  • King, C. (2008). The earth science misconceptions of some science writers: How wrong can they be? Teaching Earth Sciences, 33(2), 9–11.
  • King, C. (2010). An analysis of misconceptions in science textbooks: Earth science in England and Wales. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 565–601.
  • Kırık, Ö., & Boz, Y. (2012). Cooperative learning instruction for conceptual change in the concepts of chemical kinetics. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13, 221–236.
  • Klein, P. (2006). The challenges of scientific literacy: From the viewpoint of second generation cognitive science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 143–178.
  • Küçüközer, H. (2008). The effects of 3D computer modeling on conceptual change about seasons and phases of the moon. Physics Education, 43(6), 632–636. *
  • Küçüközer, H., Korkusuz, E., Küçüközer, A., and Yürümezoglu, K. (2009). The effect of 3D computer modeling and observation-based instruction on the conceptual change regarding basic concepts of astronomy in elementary school students. Astronomy Education Review, 8(1), 1–18. *
  • Lee, O., Lester, B., Ma, L., Lambert, J., & Jean-Baptiste, M. (2007). Conceptions of the greenhouse effect and global warming among elementary students from diverse languages and cultures. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55(2), 117–125. *
  • Lelliott, A., & Rollnick, M. (2010). Big ideas: A review of astronomy education research 1974–2008. International Journal of Science Education, 32(13), 1771–1799.
  • Liaw, H., Chiu, M., & Chou, C. (2014). Using facial recognition technology in the exploration of student responses to conceptual conflict phenomenon. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15, 824–834.
  • Libarkin, J., & Anderson, S. (2005). Assessment of learning in entry-level geoscience courses: Results of the geoscience concept inventory. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 394–401.
  • Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Pugh, K., Koskey, K., & Stewart, V. (2012). Developing conceptual understanding of natural selection: The role of interest, efficacy, and basic prior knowledge. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(1), 45–68.
  • Lombardi, D., Sinatra, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2013). Plausibility reappraisals and shifts in middle school students’ climate change conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 27, 50–62. *
  • Marques, L., & Thompson, D. (1997). Misconceptions and conceptual changes concerning continental drift and plate tectonics among Portuguese students aged 16–17. Research in Science & Technological Education, 15(2), 195–222. *
  • Martinez, P., Bannan, B., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Bilingual students’ ideas and conceptual change about slow geomorphological changes caused by water. Journal of Geoscience Education, 60(1), 54–66. *
  • Mason, L., Gava, M., & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 291–309.
  • McCuin, J., Hayhoe, K., & Hayhoe, D. (2014). Comparing the effects of traditional vs. misconceptions-based instruction on student understanding of the greenhouse effect. Journal of Geoscience Education, 63(3), 445–459. *
  • Murphy, P., & Alexander, P. (2004). Persuasion as a dynamic, multidimensional process: An investigation of individual and intraindividual differences. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 337–363.
  • Nielsen, W., & Hoban, G. (2015). Designing a digital teaching resource to explain phases of the moon: A case study of preservice elementary teachers making a slowmation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(9), 1207–1324. *
  • Nussbaum, J., & Novak, J. (1976). An assessment of children's conceptions of the earth utilizing structured interviews. Science Education, 60(4), 535–550.
  • Nussbaum, J., & Sharoni-Dagan, N. (1983). Changes in second grade children's preconceptions about earth as a cosmic body resulting from a short series of audio-tutorial lessons. Science Education, 67(1), 99–114. *
  • Ogan-Bekiroglu, F. (2007). Effects of model-based teaching on pre-service physics teachers’ conceptions of the moon, moon phases, and other lunar phenomena. International Journal of Science Education, 29(5), 555–593. *
  • Pintrich, P., Marx, R., & Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.
  • Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.
  • Qian, G., & Pan, J. (2002). A comparison of epistemological beliefs and learning from science text between American and Chinese high school students. In B. Hofer & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 365–385). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Randolph, J. (2009). A guide to writing the dissertation literature review. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 14(13), 1–13.
  • Rebich, S., & Gautier, C. (2005). Concept mapping to reveal prior knowledge and conceptual change in a mock summit course on global climate change. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 355–365. *
  • Salierno, C., Edelson, D., & Sherin, B. (2005). The development of student conceptions of the earth-sun relationship in an inquiry-based curriculum. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 422–431. *
  • Schank, P., & Kozma, R. (2002). Learning chemistry through the use of a representation-based knowledge building environment. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(3), 253–279.
  • Schneps, M., Ruel, J., Sonnert, G., Dussault, M., Griffin, M., & Sadler, P. (2014). Conceptualiszing astronomical scale: Virtual simulations on handheld tablet computers reverse misconceptions. Computers & Education, 70, 269–280. *
  • Scott, P., Asoko, H., & Driver, R. (1991). Teaching for conceptual change: A review of strategies. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies (pp. 310–329). Kiel: University of Keil.
  • Şendur, G., & Toprak, M. (2013). The role of conceptual change texts to improce students’ understanding of alkenes. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 431–449.
  • Sharp, J. C., & Sharp, J. G. (2007). Beyond shape and gravity: Children's ideas about the earth in space reconsidered. Research Papers in Education, 22(3), 363–401. *
  • Shen, J., & Confrey, J. (2007). From conceptual change to transformative modeling: A case study of an elementary teacher. Science Education, 91(6), 948–966. *
  • Sinatra, G. (2005). The warming trend in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational psychologist, 40(2), 107–115.
  • Sinatra, G., & Mason, L. (2013). Beyond knowledge: Learner characteristics influencing conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (2nd ed., pp. 377–394). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Sneider, C., & Ohadi, M. (1998). Unraveling students’ misconceptions about the earth's shape and gravity. Science Education, 82(2), 265–284. *
  • Steer, D., Knight, C., Owens, K., & McConnell, D. (2005). Challenging students’ ideas about earth's interior using a model-based conceptual change approach in a large class setting. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 415–421. *
  • Stieff, M., & Wilensky, U. (2003). Connected chemistry: Incorporating interactive simulations into the chemistry classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(3), 285–302.
  • Stover, S., & Saunders, G. (2000). Astronomical misconceptions and the effectiveness of science museums in promoting conceptual change. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 12(1), 41–51. *
  • Supasorn, S. (2015). Grade 12 students’ conceptual understanding and mental models of galvanic cells before and after learning by using small-scale experiments in conjunction with a model kit. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 393–407.
  • Supasorn, S., & Promarak, V. (2015). Implementation of 5E inquiry incorporated with analogy learning approach to enhance conceptual understanding of chemical reaction rate for grade 11 students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 121–132.
  • Taasoobshirazi, G., & Sinatra, G. (2011). A structural equation model of conceptual change in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 901–918.
  • Taylor, I., Barker, M., & Jones, A. (2003). Promoting mental model building in astronomy. International Journal of Science Education, 25(10), 1205–1225. *
  • Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Treagust, D., & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 297–328.
  • Trumper, R. (2006). Teaching future teachers basic astronomy concepts—seasonal changes—at a time of reform in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(9), 879–906. *
  • Trundle, K., Atwood, R., & Christopher, J. (2002). Pre-service elementary teachers’ conceptions of moon phases before and after instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 633–658. *
  • Trundle, K., Atwood, R., & Christopher, J. (2006). Pre-service elementary teachers’ knowledge of observable moon phases and pattern of change in phases. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(2), 87–101. *
  • Trundle, K., Atwood, R., & Christopher, J. (2007a). Fourth-grade elementary students’ conceptions of standards-based lunar concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 29(5), 595–616. *
  • Trundle, K., Atwood, R., & Christopher, J. (2007b). A longitudinal study of conceptual change: Pre-service elementary teachers’ conceptions of moon phases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 303–326. *
  • Trundle, K., Atwood, R., Christopher, J., & Saçkes, M. (2010). The effect of guided inquiry-based instruction on middle school students’ understanding of lunar concepts. Research In Science Education, 40(3), 451–478. *
  • Trundle, K., & Bell, R. (2010). The use of a computer simulation to promote conceptual change: A quasi-experimental study. Computers and Education, 54(4), 1078–1088. *
  • Tsai, C., & Chang, C. (2005). Lasting effects of instruction guided by the conflict map: Experimental study of learning about the causes of the seasons. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(10), 1089–1111. *
  • Tyson, L., Venville, G., Harrison, A., & Treagust, D. (1997). A multidimensional framework for interpreting conceptual change events in the classroom. Science Education, 81(4), 387–404.
  • Tytler, R., & Prain, V. (2010). A framework for re-thinking learning in science from recent cognitive science perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 32(15), 2055–2078.
  • Ucar, S., & Trundle, K. (2011). Conducting a guided inquiry in science classes using authentic, archived, we-based data. Computers and Education, 57(2), 1571–1582. *
  • Ucar, S., Trundle, K., & Krissek, L. (2011). Inquiry-based instruction with archived, online data: An intervention study with pre-service teachers. Research in Science Education, 41(2), 261–282. *
  • Ültay, N., Durukan, Ü., & Ültay, E. (2015). Evaluation of the effectiveness of conceptual change texts in the REACT strategy. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 22–38.
  • Venville, G., & Treagust, D. (1996). Exploring conceptual change in genetics using a multidimensional interpretive framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(9), 1031–1055.
  • Venville, G. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Exploring conceptual change in genetics using a multidimensional interpretive framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(9), 1031–1055.
  • Viiri, J., & Saari, H. (2004). Research-based teaching unit on the tides. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 463–481. *
  • Vosniadou, S. & Brewer, W. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24(4), 535–585.
  • West, L. & Pines, A. (1983). How “rational” is rationality? Science Education, 67(1), 37–39.
  • Wilder, A., & Brinkerhoff, J. (2007). Supporting representational competence in high school biology with computer-based biomolecular visualisations. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26(1), 5–26.
  • Wu, H., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: students’ use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 821–842.
  • Zelik, M., Schau, C., Mattern, N. (1999). Conceptual astronomy. II. Replicating conceptual gains, probing attitude change across three semesters. American Journal of Physics, 67, 923–927. *
  • Zembylas, M. (2005). Three perspectives in linking the cognitive and the emotional in science learning: Conceptual change, socio-constructivism and poststructuralism. Studies in Science Education, 41(1), 91–115.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.