1,242
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Promoting cognitive and social aspects of inquiry through classroom discourse

, , , &
Pages 319-343 | Received 20 Oct 2015, Accepted 12 Feb 2016, Published online: 02 Mar 2016

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R. A., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., … Tuan, H.-L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88, 397–419. doi: 10.1002/sce.10118
  • Aguiar, O. G., Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. (2010). Learning from and responding to students’ questions: The authoritative and dialogic tension. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2), 174–193.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Anderson, C. W., & Smith, E. L. (1987). Teaching science. In V. Richardson-Koehler (Ed.), Educators’ handbook: A research perspective (pp. 84–111). New York, NY: Longman.
  • Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., & Pasley, J. D. (2006). The status of K-12 science teaching in the United States. In D. W. Sunal & E. L. Wright (Eds.), The impact of state and national standards on K-12 science teaching (pp. 83–122). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  • Barrow, L. H. (2006). A brief history of inquiry: From Dewey to standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(3), 265–278. doi: 10.1007/s10972-006-9008-5
  • Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy from purposes to practice. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161–199. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1
  • Chin, C., & Kayalvizhi, G. (2002). Posing questions for open investigations: What questions do pupils ask? Research in Science & Technological Education, 20 (Formatting) (2), 269–287. doi: 10.1080/0263514022000030499
  • Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175–218. doi: 10.1002/sce.10001
  • Clark, D. J., Weinberger, A., Jucks, R., Spitulnik, M., & Sallace, R. (2003). Designing effective science inquiry in text-based computer-supported collaborative learning environments. International Journal of Educational Policy, 4(1), 55–82.
  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12. doi: 10.3102/0013189X023007005
  • Gabel, C. (2006). Impact of the reform efforts on K-12 science inquiry. In D. W. Sunal & E. L. Wright (Eds.), The impact of state and national standards on K-12 science teaching (pp. 215–256). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  • Glaser, B. G. (1969). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. In G. J. McCall & J. L. Simmons (Eds.), Issues in participant observation (pp. 216–228). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Grotzer, T., & Bell, B. (Eds.). (1999). Negotiating the funnel: Guiding students toward understanding elusive generative concepts (pp. 59–76). Cambridge, MA: Fellows and Trustees of Harvard College.
  • Guan, Q., & Meng, W. (2007). China's new national curriculum reform: Innovation, challenges, and strategies. Frontiers of Education in China, 2(4), 579–604. doi: 10.1007/s11516-007-0043-6
  • Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. doi: 10.1177/1525822X05279903
  • Gwet, K. L. (2014). Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters (4th ed.). Gaithersburg, MD: Advanced Analytics.
  • Jacobs, J. K., Kawanaka, T., & Stigler, J. W. (1999). Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches to the analysis of video data on classroom teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 717–724. doi: 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00036-1
  • Jacobs, S., & Jackson, S. (1982). Conversational argument: A discourse analytic approach. In J. R. Cox & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Advances in argumentation theory and research (pp. 205–237). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Jin, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2012). A learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in science Teaching, 49, 1149–1180. doi: 10.1002/tea.21051
  • Jin, H., & Wei, X. (2014). Using ideas from the history of science and linguistics to develop a learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems. In R. F. Chen, A. Eisenkraft, F. Fortus, J. Krajcik, K. Neumann, J. C. Nordine, & A. Scheff (Eds.), Teaching and learning of energy in K-12 Education (pp. 157–174). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 631–645. doi: 10.1002/tea.1023
  • Krystyniak, R. A., & Heikkinen, H. W. (2007). Analysis of verbal interactions during an extended, open-inquiry general chemistry laboratory investigation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1160–1186. doi: 10.1002/tea.20218
  • Lemke, L. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
  • Loverude, M. E., Kautz, C. H., & Heron, P. R. L. (2002). Student understanding of the first law of thermodynamics: Relating work to the adiabatic compression of an ideal gas. American Journal of Physics, 70, 137–148. doi: 10.1119/1.1417532
  • Lunetta, V. N., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M. P. (2007). Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. In N. G. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 393–441). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94, 203–229.
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2003). Physics curriculum standards. Beijing: Author.
  • Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grade K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: Achieve.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know? Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing.
  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730660207
  • Ren, F. (2011). Report on science literacy of Chinese citizens. Shanghai: Popular Science.
  • van Rens, V. L., Pilot, A., & van der Schee, J. (2010). A framework for teaching scientific inquiry in upper secondary school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 788–806. doi: 10.1002/tea.20357
  • Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, F. R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Finding from language minority classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(1), 61–94. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0201_2
  • Roth, K., Druker, S., Garnier, H., Lemmens, M., Chen, C., Kawanaka, T., … Gonzales, P. (2006). Teaching science in five countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study statistical analysis report (NCES 2006–011). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The development of science process skills in authentic contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 127–152. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660300203
  • Sack, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
  • Sanderson, B. A., & Kratochvil, D. (1971). Science: A process approach. Palo Alto, CA: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
  • Schwab, J. J. (1958). The teaching of science as inquiry. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 14, 374–379.
  • Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sun, D., Wang, Z. H., Xie, W. T., & Boon, C. C. (2014). Status of integrated science instruction in junior secondary schools of China: An exploratory study. International Journal of Science Education, 36(5), 808–838. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2013.829254
  • Sunal, D. W., & Wright, E. L. (2005). The impact of state and national standards on K-12 science teaching. Greenwich, CT: Informationage Publishing.
  • TechSmith. (2012). Camtasia Studio 8. Retrieved from https://www.techsmith.com/tutorial-camtasia-8–07-cut-media-timeline.html
  • Zhang, B., Krajcik, J., Sutherland, L. M., Wang, L., Wu, J., & Qian, Y. (2003). Opportunities and challenges of China's Inquiry-based education reform in middle and high schools: Perspectives of science teachers and teacher educators. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(4), 477–503. doi: 10.1007/s10763-005-1517-8
  • Zhao, Y., & Qiu, W. (2010). China as a case study of systemic educational reform. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 349–362). Dordrecht: Springer.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.