A case study on the formation and sharing process of science classroom norms

References

• Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1–52. doi: 10.1080/03057269608560077
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. D. (1996). Study of curriculum reform (Vol. I: Findings and conclusions). Studies of education reform. US Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents; Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-9328.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1023/A:1015171124982
   Google Scholar
• Becker, N., Rasmussen, C., Sweeney, G., Wawro, M., Towns, M., & Cole, R. (2013). Reasoning using particulate nature of matter: An example of a sociochemical norm in a university-level physical chemistry class. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(1), 81–94. doi: 10.1039/C2RP20085F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boostrom, R. (1991). The nature and functions of classroom rules. Curriculum Inquiry, 21(2), 193–216. doi: 10.1080/03626784.1991.11075363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, J. (2016). Types and formation of classroom norms in inquiry activities of elementary school science (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, J., & Song, J. (2015). A case study on the features of classroom norms formed in inquiry activities of elementary science classes. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(2), 303–312. doi: 10.14697/jkase.2015.35.2.0303
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein, A. (1954). Ideas and opinion. New York, NY: Bonanza Books.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R. (2002). Factors for effective learning groups in Face-to-Face and virtual environments. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(3), 307–319.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R. (2003). A model of norm development for computer-mediated teamwork. Small Group Research, 34(3), 322–352. doi: 10.1177/1046496403034003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hechter, M., & Opp, K. D. (2001). What have we learned about the emergence of social norms. In M. Hechter & K. D. Opp (Eds.), Social norms (pp. 394–415). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Horne, C. (2001). Sociological perspectives on the emergence of social norms. In M. Hechter, & K. D. Opp (Eds.), Social norms (pp. 1–34). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. W. (1990). Life in classrooms. New York, NY: Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M., & Tan, A. L. (2011). Rethinking difficulties of teaching inquiry-based practical work: Stories from elementary pre-service teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 33(4), 465–486. doi: 10.1080/09500691003639913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<296::AID-TEA1007>3.0.CO;2-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.),Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implication for science education (pp. 95–132). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Roehrig, G. H., & Luft, J. A. (2004). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 3–24. doi: 10.1080/0950069022000070261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M. (1995). Authentic school science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Saka, Y., Southerland, S. A., & Brooks, J. S. (2009). Becoming a member of a school community while working toward science education reform: Teacher induction from a Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) perspective. Science Education, 93(6), 996–1025. doi: 10.1002/sce.20342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmuck, R. A., & Schmuck, P. A. (1997). Group processes in the classroom. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
   Google Scholar
• Schweingruber, H. A., Duschl, R. A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in Grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, K. (2005). Building enacted science curricula on the capital of learners. Science Education, 89(4), 577–594. doi: 10.1002/sce.20064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1963). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press (Translation of Russian original, published 1934).
   Google Scholar
• Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 4, 458–477. doi: 10.2307/749877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar