Supporting pre-service elementary teachers in their understanding of inquiry teaching through the construction of a third discursive space

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701. doi: 10.1080/09500690050044044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguirre, J. M., & Haggerty, S. M. (1995). Preservice teachers’ meanings of learning. International Journal of Science Education, 17(1), 119–131. doi: 10.1080/0950069950170109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. (1996). Study of a curriculum reform. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Asay, L. D., & Orgill, M. (2010). Analysis of essential features of inquiry found in articles published in the science teacher, 1998–2007. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 57–79. doi: 10.1007/s10972-009-9152-9
   Google Scholar
• Baker, W. P., Lang, M., & Lawson, A. E. (2002). Classroom management for successful student inquiry. Classroom Management, 75(5), 248–252.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (1992). Improving higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W., Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L. A., & Granger, E. M. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accountability? A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education, 94(4), 577–616. doi: 10.1002/sce.20390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bright, P., & Yore, L. D. (2002, April). Preservice teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science and their influence on classroom practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, L.A.
   Google Scholar
• Briscoe, C. (1991). The dynamic interactions among beliefs, role metaphors and teaching practices: A case study of teacher change. Science Education, 75(2), 185–199. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730750204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britzman, D. (1986). Cultural myths in the making of a teacher: Biography and social structure in teacher education. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 442–457. doi: 10.17763/haer.56.4.mv28227614l44u66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, L. A., & Abell, S. K. (1999). The development of professional knowledge in learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 121–139. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199902)36:2<121::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, G. A., Trauth-Nare, A. E., & Kaftan, J. (2010). Making formative assessmentdiscernable to pre-service teachers of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 402–421. doi: 10.1002/tea.20344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, T., & Bohn, C. (2008). Science laboratory experiences of high school students across one state in the U.S.: Descriptive research from the classroom. Science Educator, 17, 36–48.
   Google Scholar
• Cañal de León, P., Criado García-Legaz, A. M., García Carmona, A., & Muñoz, G. (2013). La enseñanza relativa al medio en las aulas españolas de Educación Infantil y Primaria: concepciones didácticas y práctica docente. Investigación en la Escuela, 81, 21–42.
   Google Scholar
• Cortés, A. L., de la Gándara, M., Calvo, J. M., Martínez, M. B., Ibarra J., Arlegui, J., & Gil, M. J. (2012). Expectativas, necesidades y oportunidades de los maestros en formación ante la enseñanza de las ciencias en la Educación Primaria. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 30(3), 155–176.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. (1999). Is it realistic to expect a preservice teacher to create an inquiry-based classroom? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10, 175–194. doi: 10.1023/A:1009422728845
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 613–642. doi: 10.1002/tea.20157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Hammerness, K. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12. doi: 10.3102/0013189X023007005
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.) (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eick, C., & Dias, M. (2005). Building the authority of experience: The development of preservice teachers’ practical knowledge through coteaching in inquiry classrooms. Science Teacher Education, 89(3), 470–491.
   Google Scholar
• El-Hani, C. N., & Greca, I. M. (2013). ComPratica: A Virtual Community of Practice for Promoting Biology Teachers’ Professional Development in Brazil. Research in Science Education, 43, 1327–1359. doi: 10.1007/s11165-012-9306-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, D., & Miller, R. T. (2011). Slow off the mark: Elementary school teachers and the crisis in science, technology, engineering, and math education. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, C. (2009). Preservice elementary teachers’ development of pedagogical design capacity for inquiry – an activity-theoretical perspective (PhD Thesis). University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., & Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2008). Making students’ thinking explicit in writing and discussion: An analysis of formative assessment prompts. Science Education, 92, 799–824. doi: 10.1002/sce.20270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1996). Sociolinguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. (2002). The use and impact of explicit instruction about the nature of science and science inquiry in an elementary science methods course. Science and Education, 11(1), 55–67. doi: 10.1023/A:1013054823482
   Google Scholar
• Greca, I. M., Meneses Villagrá, J. A., & Díez Ojeda, M. (2016). La formación en ciencias de los alumnos del Grado en Maestro de Educación Primaria. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano‐López, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286–303. doi:10.1080/10749039909524733
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K., Baquedano-López, P., & Turner, M. G. (1997). Putting language back into the language arts: When the radical middle meets the third space. Language Arts, 74(5), 368–378.
   Google Scholar
• Haefner, L. A., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2004). Learning by doing? Prospective elementary teachers’ developing understandings of scientific inquiry and science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1653–1674. doi: 10.1080/0950069042000230709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hapgood, S., Magnusson, S. J., & Palincsar, A. S. (2004). Teacher, text, and experience: A case of young childreńs scientific inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(4), 455–505. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1304_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, I., Jonen, A., Moller, K., & Stern, E. (2006). Effects of instructional support within constructivist learning environments for elementary school students’ understanding of “floating and sinking”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 307–326. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K-L., Jensz, F., & Baldwin, G. (2005). Who’s teaching science? Meeting the demand for qualified science teachers in Australian secondary schools. (Report prepared for the Australian Council of Deans of Science). Retrieved January 15, 2015, from http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/people/harris_docs/Who%27sTeachingScience.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hashweh, M. Z. (2005). Teacher pedagogical constructions: A reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(3), 273–292. doi: 10.1080/13450600500105502
   Google Scholar
• Helms, J. V. (1998). Science – and me: Subject matter and identity in secondary school science teachers. Research in Science Education, 35, 811–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ireland, J. E., Watters, J. J., Brownlee, J., & Lupton, M. (2012). Elementary teacher’s conceptions of inquiry teaching: Messages for teacher development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 159–175. doi: 10.1007/s10972-011-9251-2
   Google Scholar
• Korthagen, F., Loughran, J., & Russel, T. (2006). Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 1020–1041. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, E., Dema, O., & Harshbarger, D. (2014). Preparation for practice: Elementary preservice teachers learning and using scientific classroom discourse community instructional strategies. School Science and Mathematics, 114(4), 154–165. doi: 10.1111/ssm.12067
   Google Scholar
• Lindahl, B. (2007). A longitudinal study of student’s attitudes towards science and choice of career. Paper presented at the 80th NARST of International Conference, New Orlands, Louisiana.
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, D. (2007). Inquire within: Implementing inquiry-based science standards in grades 3–8. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lotter, C., Singer, J., & Godfrey, J. (2009). The influence of repeated teaching and reflection on preservice teachers’ views of inquiry and nature of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 553–582. doi: 10.1007/s10972-009-9144-9
   Google Scholar
• Luehmann, A. L. (2007). Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation. Science Education, 91, 822–839. doi: 10.1002/sce.20209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry. The Science Teacher, 69(2), 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Mellado, V. (1998). Preservice teachers’ classroom practice and their conceptions of the nature of science. In B. J. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1093–1105). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Melville, W., Campbell, T., Fazio, X., Stefanile, A., & Tkaczyk, N. (2014). Problematizing the practicum to integrate practical knowledge. Research in Science Education, 44(5), 751–775. doi: 10.1007/s11165-014-9404-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, K. (2011). Disentangling robust development constrains from the instructionally mutable: Young childreńs epistemic reasoning about a study of their own design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(1), 50–110. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2011.529325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munby, H., & Russell, T. (1992). Frames of reflection: An introduction. In T. Russell & H. Munby (Eds.), Teachers and teaching: From classroom to reflection (pp. 1–8). London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Nam, J., Seung, E., & Go, M. (2013). The effect of a collaborative mentoring program on beginning science teachers’ inquiry-based teaching practice. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 815–836. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.584329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. F., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Paillé, P., & Mucchielli, A. (2003). L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales. Paris: Armand Colin.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Piburn, M., Sawada, D., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., Bloom, I., & Judson, E. (2000). Reformed teaching observation protocol (RTOP): Reference manual (ACEPT Technical Report No. IN00-3). Tempe, AZ: Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Rop, C. J. (2002). The meaning of students’ inquiry questions: A teacher’s beliefs and responses. International Journal of Science Education, 24(7), 717–736. doi: 10.1080/09500690110095294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Royal Society. (2006). Taking a leading role. London: The Royal Society.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, T., Bell, D., McGuigan, L., Qualter, A., Quinn, J., & Schilling, M. (1992). Teachers’ conceptual understanding in science: Needs and possibilities in the primary phase. In L. Newton (Ed.), Primary science: The challenge of the 1990s (pp. 69–83). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, T., & Munby, H. (1991). Reframing: The role of experience in developing teachers’ professional knowledge. In D. A. Schön (Ed.), The reflective turn: Case studies in and on educational practice (pp. 164–187). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. (2009). Developing preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge and practices through modeling-centered scientific inquiry. Science Education, 93(4), 720–744. doi: 10.1002/sce.20324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seung, E., Park, S., & Jung, J. (2014). Exploring preservice elementary teachers’ understanding of the essential features of inquiry-based science teaching using evidence-based reflection. Research in Science Education, 44(4), 507–525. doi: 10.1007/s11165-013-9390-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1993). Renewing the pedagogy of teacher education: The impact of subject-specific conceptions of teaching. In L. Montero & J. M. Vez (Eds.), Las didácticas específicas en la formación del profesorado (pp. 53–69). Santiago: Tórculo.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L., & Southerland, S. A. (2008). Reforming practice or modifying reforms? Elementary teachers’ response to the tools of reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 396–423.
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, G., & Bird, T. (1992). Teacher education and the case idea. Review of Research in Education, 19, 457–521.
   Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137::AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace C. S., & Kang, N. H. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers’ beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 936–960. doi: 10.1002/tea.20032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175. doi: 10.3102/00346543072002131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112–143. doi: 10.1002/sce.10044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Young, B. J., & Kellogg, T. (1993). Science attitudes and preparation of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 77, 279–291. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730770303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangori, L., & Forbes, C. T. (2013). Preservice elementary teachers and explanation construction: Knowledge-for-practice and knowledge-in-practice. Science Education, 97(2), 310–330. doi: 10.1002/sce.21052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembal-Saul, C., Blumenfeld, P., & Krajcik, J. (2000). Influence of guided cycles of planning, teaching, and reflection on prospective elementary teachers’ science content representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 318–339. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:4<318::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar