Over reported and misunderstood? A study of teachers’ reported enactment and knowledge of inquiry-based science teaching

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R. Hofstein, A., … Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419. doi: 10.1002/sce.10118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969. doi: 10.1080/09500690701749305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams, E., Southerland, S. A., & Silva, P. (2008). Inquiry in the classroom: Identifying necessary components of a useful definition. In Abrams, E., Southerland, S. A., & Silva, P. (Eds.), Inquiry in the classroom: Realities and opportunities (pp. xi–xiii). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Sciences. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. D. (2007). Inquiry as an organizing theme for science curricula. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 807–830). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Banilower, E. R., Heck, D. J., & Weiss, I. R. (2007). Can professional development make the vision of the standards a reality? The impact of the national science foundation’s local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 375–395. doi: 10.1002/tea.20145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, J. W., & Woolnough, B. E. (1982). Practical work in 11–13 science: The context, type and aims of current practice. British Educational Research Journal, 8(1), 23–30. doi: 10.1080/0141192820080103
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., & Granger, E. M. (2009). No silver bullet for inquiry: Making sense of teacher change following an inquiry-based research experience for teachers. Science Education, 93(2), 322–360. doi: 10.1002/sce.20298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradburn, N. M., Sudman, S., & Wansink, B. (2004). Asking questions: The definitive guide to questionnaire design--for market research, political polls, and social and health questionnaires. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. L., Abell, S. K., Demir, A., & Schmidt, F. J. (2006). College science teachers’ views of classroom inquiry. Science Education, 90(5), 784–802. doi: 10.1002/sce.20151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 20–46). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013a). Inquiry-based instruction and teaching about nature of science: Are they happening? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 497–526. doi: 10.1007/s10972-012-9314-z
   Google Scholar
• Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013b). Inquiry-based professional development: What does it take to support teachers in learning about inquiry and nature of science? International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 1947–1978. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.760209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916–937. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<916::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. (2014). From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classroom. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 515–544). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demir, A., & Abell, S. K. (2010). Views of inquiry: Mismatches between views of science education faculty and students of an alternative certification program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(6), 716–741. doi: 10.1002/tea.20365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills/Qualification and Curriculum Authority. (2004). Science – The national curriculum for England. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, J. (2008). A review of the research on practical work in school science (pp. 1–9). London: King’s College.
   Google Scholar
• Durso, F. T., & Coggins, K. A. (1991). Organized instruction for the improvement of word knowledge skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 108–112. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. doi: 10.3102/00028312038004915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ireland, J. E., Watters, J. J., Brownlee, J., & Lupton, M. (2012). Elementary teacher’s conceptions of inquiry teaching: Messages for teacher development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(2), 159–175. doi: 10.1007/s10972-011-9251-2
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, F., & McComas, W. F. (2015). The effects of inquiry teaching on student science achievement and attitudes: Evidence from Propensity Score Analysis of PISA Data. International Journal of Science Education,37(3), 554–576. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2014.1000426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, N. H., Orgill, M., & Crippen, K. J. (2008). Understanding teachers’ conceptions of classroom inquiry with a teaching scenario survey instrument. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(4), 337–354. doi: 10.1007/s10972-008-9097-4
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. (1998). Form and substance in in-service teacher education. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 631–645. doi: 10.1002/tea.1023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2006). Overcoming a learning bottleneck: Inquiry professional development for secondary science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(3), 185–216. doi: 10.1007/s10972-005-9002-3
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. C., Horton, R., Igo, B. L., & Switzer, D. M. (2009). K-12 science and mathematics teachers’ beliefs about and use of inquiry in the classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 575–596. doi: 10.1007/s10763-007-9122-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S., & Jackson, D. N. (1961). Acquiescence and the factorial interpretation of the MMPI. Psychological Bulletin, 58(4), 299–304. doi: 10.1037/h0043979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education of Singapore. (2007). Primary science syllabus. Singapore: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 science education: Practices crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. F., & Patterson, A. (2011). Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction? Science Education, 95(4), 627–638. doi: 10.1002/sce.20438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozel, M., & Luft, J. A. (2013). Beginning secondary science teachers’ conceptualization and enactment of inquiry based instruction. School Science and Mathematics, 113(6), 308–316. doi: 10.1111/ssm.12030
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921–958. doi: 10.3102/0002831207308221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. (2003). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Tomorrow 98: Report of the superior committee on science mathematics and technology in Israel. (1992/1994). Jerusalem: Ministry of Education and Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R. (2007). Re-Imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia's future. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2011). World urbanization prospects, the 2011 Revision [Data file]. Retrieved from http://esa.un.org/unup/CD-ROM/Urban-Rural-Population.htm
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Education. (2012). Teacher trends. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=28
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, I. R., Pasley, J. D., Smith, P. S., Banilower, E. R., & Heck, D. J. (2003). Looking inside the classroom: A study of K–12 mathematics and science education in the United States. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
   Google Scholar
• Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narratives and semi-structured methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. M. (2013). Teachers’ understanding of inquiry and reported use of scientific practices: A survey of NSTA conference attendees (Unpublished master’s degree thesis). University of Maine, Maine.
   Google Scholar