Elementary teachers’ use of content knowledge to evaluate students’ thinking in the life sciences

References

• Anderson, J. L., Ellis, J. P., & Jones, A. M. (2014). Understanding early elementary children’s conceptual knowledge of plant structure and function through drawings. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 375–386. doi:10.1187/cbe.13-12-0230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aschbacher, P., & Alonzo, A. (2006). Examining the utility of elementary science notebooks for formative assessment purposes. Educational Assessment, 11, 179–203. doi: 10.1207/s15326977ea1103&4_3
   Google Scholar
• Ash, D., & Levitt, K. (2003). Working within the zone of proximal development: Formative assessment as professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(1), 23–48. doi: 10.1023/A:1022999406564
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. doi: 10.1177/0022487108324554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barman, C. R., Stein, M., McNair, S., & Barman, N. S. (2006). Students’ ideas about plants and plant growth. The American Biology Teacher, 68(2), 73–79. doi: 10.1662/0002-7685(2006)068[0073:SIAPPG]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristic of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85(5), 536–553. doi: 10.1002/sce.1022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, G.A., & Trauth-Nare, A.E. 2009. Preparing teachers to make the formative assessment process integral to science teaching and learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 475–494. doi: 10.1007/s10972-009-9142-y
   Google Scholar
• Buck, G. A., Trauth-Nare, A., & Kaftan, J. (2010). Making formative assessment discernable to pre-service teachers of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 402–421. doi: 10.1002/tea.20344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camburn, E., & Barnes, C. A. (2004). Assessing the validity of a language arts instruction log through triangulation. Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 49–73. doi: 10.1086/428802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1109–1136. doi: 10.1002/tea.20440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, M. S., & Bransford, J. D. (Eds.). (2005). How students learn: Science in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, A. (2011). Teachers learning from professional development in elementary science: Reciprocal relations between formative assessment and pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 96, 265–290. doi: 10.1002/sce.20473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, C.T., Sabel, J.L., & Biggers, M. (2015a). Elementary teachers’ use of formative assessment to support students’ learning about water-earth materials interactions. Journal of Geoscience Education, 63(3), 210–221. doi: 10.5408/14-063.1.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, C.T., Sabel, J.L., & Zangori, L. (2015b). Integrating life science content and instructional methods in elementary teacher education. American Biology Teacher, 77(9), 5–11. doi: 10.1525/abt2015.77.9.2.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrichsen, P. M. (2001). Moving from hands-on to inquiry-based: A biology course for prospective elementary teachers. The American Biology Teacher, 63(8), 562–568. doi: 10.1662/0002-7685(2001)063[0562:MFHTIA]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottheiner, D.M., & Siegel, M. A. (2012). Experienced middle school science teachers’ assessment literacy: Investigating knowledge of students’ conceptions in genetics and ways to shape instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 531–557. doi: 10.1007/s10972-012-9278-z
   Google Scholar
• Haefner, L. A., Friedrichsen, P. M., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2006). Teaching with insects: An applied life science course for supporting prospective elementary teachers’ scientific inquiry. The American Biology Teacher, 86(4), 206–212. doi: 10.1662/0002-7685(2006)68[206:TWIAAL]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., Goldberg, F., & Fargason, S. (2012). Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom. Review of Science, Mathematics, and ICT Education, 6, 51–72.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues Practice, 28(3), 24–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00151.x
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371–406. doi: 10.3102/00028312042002371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 203–235. doi: 10.1023/B:JMTE.0000033084.26326.19
   Google Scholar
• Keeley, P. (2005). Science curriculum topic study. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. M. (1998). Education reform and subject matter knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(3), 249–263. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199803)35:3<249::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikas, E. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions and misconceptions concerning three natural phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 432–448. doi: 10.1002/tea.20012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., & Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice teachers’ attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 142–154. doi: 10.1177/0022487108330245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., Wolfinger, R. D., & Schabenberger, O. (2006). SAS for mixed models (2nd ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, J. A. (2013). Exploring exemplary elementary teachers’ conceptions and implementation of inquiry science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 573–588. doi: 10.1007/s10972-012-9302-3
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards. For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Otero, V. K. (2006). Moving beyond the “get it or don’t” concept of formative assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 247–255. doi: 10.1177/0022487105285963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otero, V. K., & Nathan, M. J. (2008). Preservice elementary teachers’ views of their students’ prior knowledge of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 497–523. doi: 10.1002/tea.20229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, D. C. (2005). I didn’t know oxygen could boil! What preservice and inservice elementary teachers’ answers to ‘simple’ science questions reveals about their subject matter knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1059–1082. doi: 10.1080/09500690500069426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowan, B. and Correnti, R. 2009. Studying reading instruction with teacher logs: Lessons from the Study of Instructional Improvement. Educational Researcher, 38, 120–131. doi: 10.3102/0013189X09332375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2006). Informal formative assessment and scientific inquiry: Exploring teachers’ practices and student learning. Educational Assessment, 11, 205–235.
   Google Scholar
• Sabel, J.L., Forbes, C.T., & Zangori, L. (2015). Promoting prospective elementary teachers’ learning to use formative assessment for life science instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(4), 419–445. doi: 10.1007/s10972-015-9431-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, P. M., Coyle, H., Miller, J. L., Cook-Smith, N., Dussault, M., & Gould, R. R. (2010). The astronomy and space science concept inventory: Development and validation of assessment instruments aligns with the K-12 National science standards. Astronomy Education Review, 8(1), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Talanquer, V., Bolger, M., & Tomanek, D. (2015). Exploring prospective teachers’ assessment practices: Noticing and interpreting student understanding in the assessment of written work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(5), 585–609. doi: 10.1002/tea.21209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talanquer, V., Tomanek, D., & Novodvorsky, I. (2013). Assessing students’ understanding of inquiry: What do prospective science teachers notice?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 189–208. doi: 10.1002/tea.21074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 134–151). New York: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar