1,049
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Effects of subject-area degree and classroom experience on new chemistry teachers’ subject matter knowledge

, &
Pages 1636-1654 | Received 04 Nov 2015, Accepted 17 Jun 2016, Published online: 12 Jul 2016

References

  • Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Arzi, H. J., & White, R. T. (2008). Change in teachers’ knowledge of subject matter: A 17-year longitudinal study. Science Education, 92(2), 221–251. doi:10.1002/sce.20239
  • Austin, B. A., Bloom, N., Grinnell, S., & Kirkley, J. (2011, April). Elementary teachers’ beliefs about lesson sequencing. Paper presented at the NARST Annual International Conference, Orlando, FL.
  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. doi: 10.1177/0022487108324554
  • Banilower, E. R., Trygstad, P. J., & Smith, P. S. (2015). The first five years: What the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education reveals about novice science teachers and their teaching. In J. A. Luft & S. L. Dubois (Eds.), Newly hired teachers of science: A better beginning (pp. 3–29). Rotterdam: Sense.
  • Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., … Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. doi: 10.3102/0002831209345157
  • Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Bullough, R. V. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge circa 1907 and 1987: A study in the history of an idea (2001). In A. R. Tom (Ed.), Counternarratives: Studies of teacher education and becoming and being a teacher (pp. 15–28). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Chan, K. K. H., & Yung, B. H. W. (2015). On-site pedagogical content knowledge development. International Journal of Science Education, 37(8), 1246–1278. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1033777
  • Cochran, K. F., & Jones, L. L. (1998). The subject matter knowledge of preservice science teachers. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 707–718). London: Kluwer Academic.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607–651. doi: 10.3102/00346543076004607
  • Deng, Z. (2001). The distinction between key ideas in teaching school physics and key ideas in the discipline of physics. Science Education, 85(3), 263–278. doi:10.1002/sce.1009
  • Deng, Z. (2007). Knowing the subject matter of a secondary-school science subject. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(5), 503–535. doi:10.1080/00220270701305362
  • Dewey, J. (1976). The child and the curriculum. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The middle works, 1899–1924 (pp. 273–291). London: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Diamond, B. S., Maerten-Rivera, J., Rohrer, R. E., & Lee, O. (2013). Elementary teachers’ science content knowledge: Relationships among multiple measures. Florida Journal of Educational Research, 51, 1–20.
  • Diamond, B. S., Maerten-Rivera, J., Rohrer, R. E., & Lee, O. (2014). Effectiveness of a curricular and professional development intervention at improving elementary teachers’ science content knowledge and student achievement outcomes: Year 1 results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 635–658. doi:10.1002/tea.21148
  • van Driel, J. H., Berry, A., & Meirink, J. (2014). Research on science teacher knowledge. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, Vol. II (pp. 848–870). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695. doi:10.1002/(sici)1098–2736(199808)35:6<673::aid-tea5>3.0.co;2-j
  • Ford, M. J., & Wargo, B. M. (2012). Dialogic framing of scientific content for conceptual and epistemic understanding. Science Education, 96(3), 369–391. doi:10.1002/sce.20482
  • Friedrichsen, P. J., Abell, S. K., Pareja, E. M., Brown, P. L., Lankford, D. M., & Volkmann, M. J. (2009). Does teaching experience matter? Examining biology teachers’ prior knowledge for teaching in an alternative certification program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(4), 357–383. doi: 10.1002/tea.20283
  • Ganaras, K., Dumon, A., & Larcher, C. (2008). Conceptual integration of chemical equilibrium by prospective physical sciences teachers. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(3), 240–249. doi:10.1039/b812413m
  • Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and their impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 51–94). Hingham, MA: Kluwer.
  • Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1995). Biology teachers’ perceptions of subject matter structure and its relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 301–325. doi:10.1002/tea.3660320309
  • Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education. Hingham, MA: Kluwer.
  • Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 129–145. doi:10.3102/01623737022002129
  • Großschedl, J., Harms, U., Kleickmann, T., & Glowinski, I. (2015). Preservice biology teachers’ professional knowledge: Structure and learning opportunities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(3), 291–318. doi:10.1007/s10972–015–9423–6
  • Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Grossman, P. L., Wilson, S. M., & Shulman, L. S. (1989). Teachers of substance: Subject matter knowledge for teaching. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 22–36). Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Haidar, A. H. (1997). Prospective chemistry teachers’ conceptions of the conservation of matter and related concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 181–197. doi:10.1002/(sici)1098–2736(199702)34:2<181::aid-tea5>3.0.co;2-p
  • Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, E. J., Gillstrom, K., Arnone, A., & Araujo, Z. D. (2015, April). Conceptual storylines: Examining teachers’ criteria for evaluating lessons. Paper presented at the NARST Annual International Conference, Chicago, IL.
  • Hauslein, P. L., Good, R. G., & Cummins, C. L. (1992). Biology content cognitive structure: From science student to science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(9), 939–964. doi:10.1002/tea.3660290905
  • Henry, G. T., Fortner, C. K., & Bastian, K. C. (2012). The effects of experience and attrition for novice high-school science and mathematics teachers. Science, 335(6072), 1118–1121. doi:10.1126/science.1215343
  • Ingersoll, R. M., Merrill, L., & Stuckey, D. (2014). Seven trends: The transformation of the teaching force: Research report published by the Consortium for Policy Research in Education (CPRE).
  • Jin, H., Shin, H., Johnson, M. E., Kim, J., & Anderson, C. W. (2015). Developing learning progression-based teacher knowledge measures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(9), 1269–1295. doi:10.1002/tea.21243
  • Johnson, H. J., & Cotterman, M. E. (2015). Developing preservice teachers’ knowledge of science teaching through video clubs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(4), 393–417. doi:10.1007/s10972–015–9429–0
  • Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x
  • Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of chemistry – logical or psychological? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(1), 9–15. doi:10.1039/a9rp90001b
  • Kaya, E. (2013). Argumentation practices in classroom: Pre-service teachers’ conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1139–1158. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.770935
  • Kind, V. (2014). Science teachers’ content knowledge. In H. Venkat, M. Rollnick, J. Loughran, & M. Askew (Eds.), Exploring mathematics and science teachers’ knowledge: Windows into teacher thinking (pp. 15–23). London: Routledge.
  • Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Lederman, N. G., Gess-Newsome, J., & Latz, M. S. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers’ conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 129–146. doi:10.1002/tea.3660310205
  • Lee, E., Brown, M. N., Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Assessing beginning secondary science teachers’ PCK: Pilot year results. School Science and Mathematics, 107(2), 52–60. doi:10.1111/j.1949–8594.2007.tb17768.x
  • Leeferink, H., Koopman, M., Beijaard, D., & Ketelaar, E. (2015). Unraveling the complexity of student teachers’ learning in and from the workplace. Journal of Teacher Education, 66, 334–348. doi:10.1177/0022487115592163
  • Luft, J. A., Dubois, S. L., Nixon, R. S., & Campbell, B. K. (2015). Supporting newly hired teachers of science: Attaining teacher professional standards. Studies in Science Education, 51(1), 1–48. doi:10.1080/03057267.2014.980559
  • Luft, J. A., Hill, K. M., Nixon, R. S., Campbell, B. K., & Dubois, S. L. (2015, January). The knowledge needed to teach science: Approaches, implications, and potential research. Paper presented at the conference of the Association for Science Teacher Educators, Portland, OR.
  • McConnell, T. J., Parker, J. M., & Eberhardt, J. (2013). Assessing teachers’ science content knowledge: A strategy for assessing depth of understanding. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 717–743. doi: 10.1007/s10972-013-9342-3
  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Dealing with validity, reliability, and ethics. In Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (pp. 209–235). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Monk, D. H. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13(2), 125–145. doi: 10.1016/0272-7757(94)90003-5
  • Mthethwa-Kunene, E., Onwu, G. O., & de Villiers, R. (2015). Exploring biology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in the teaching of genetics in Swaziland science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 1140–1165. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1022624
  • National Research Council (NRC). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Nixon, R. S., & Luft, J. A. (2015). Teaching chemistry with a biology degree: Crosscutting concepts as boundary objects. In J. A. Luft & S. L. Dubois (Eds.), Newly hired teachers of science: A better beginning (pp. 75–85). Rotterdam: Sense.
  • Oversby, J. (2002). Assessing conceptual understanding. In S. Amos & R. Boohan (Eds.), Aspects of teaching secondary science: Perspectives on practice (pp. 148–160). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Özmen, H., & Ayas, A. A. (2003). Students’ difficulties in understanding of the conservation of matter in open and closed-system chemical reactions. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4(3), 279–290.
  • QSR International. (2010). NVivo 9. Victoria, Australia.
  • Quilez, J. (2004). Changes in concentration and in partial pressure in chemical equilibria: Students’ and teachers’ misunderstandings. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5(3), 281–300. doi:10.1039/b3rp90033a
  • Rollnick, M., Bennett, J., Rhemtula, M., Dharsey, N., & Ndlovu, T. (2008). The place of subject matter knowledge in pedagogical content knowledge: A case study of South African teachers teaching the amount of substance and chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1365–1387. doi:10.1080/09500690802187025
  • Roth, K. J., Garnier, H. E., Chen, C., Lemmens, M., Schwille, K., & Wickler, N. I. Z. (2011). Videobased lesson analysis: Effective science PD for teacher and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 117–148. doi:10.1002/tea.20408
  • Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H. P., Cook-Smith, N., & Miller, J. L. (2013). The influence of teachers’ knowledge on student learning in middle school physical science classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1020–1049. doi:10.3102/0002831213477680
  • Sahin Pekmez, E. (2010). Using analogies to prevent misconceptions about chemical equilibrium. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 1–35.
  • Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Sanders, L. R., Borko, H., & Lockard, J. D. (1993). Secondary science teachers’ knowledge base when teaching science courses in and out of their area of certification. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(7), 723–736. doi:10.1002/tea.3660300710
  • Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2002). No child left behind Act of 2001. Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html
  • Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps and recommendations. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.