Dialectical dividends: fostering hybridity of new pedagogical practices and partnerships in science education and outreach

References

• Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169. doi:10.3102/0034654311404435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Science, Technology and Engineering Council (ASTEC) (1997). Foundations for Australia’s future: Science and technology in primary schools. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Avraamidou, L. (2013). Prospective elementary teachers’ science teaching orientations and experiences that impacted their development. International Journal of Science Education, 35(10), 1698–1724. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.708945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A. (2007). Does creativity have a place in classroom discussions? Prospective teachers’ response preferences. Thinking skills and creativity, 2(1), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benaquisto, L. (2008). Axial coding. In L. M. Given, (Eds.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bencze, J. L., & Bowen, G. M. (2009). Student-teachers’ dialectically developed motivation for promoting student-led science projects. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 133–159. doi:10.1007/s10763-007-9115-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggers, M., & Forbes, C. T. (2012). Balancing teacher and student roles in elementary classrooms: Preservice elementary teachers’ learning about the inquiry continuum. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2205–2229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W., Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L. A., & Granger, E. M. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accountability? A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education, 94(4), 577–616.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, M. B. (2009). Motivating young students to be successful in science: Keeping it real, relevant and rigorous. Retrieved from http://www.ngspscience.com/profdev/Monographs/SCL22-0419A_SCI_AM_Butler_lores.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chenail, R. (2008). Categorization. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 72–73). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledger Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Crane, V. (1994). Informal science learning: What the research says about television, science museums, and community-based projects. London: Research Communications.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607–651. doi:10.3102/00346543076004607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, K., McCauley, V., Domegan, C., & McClune, W. (2008). A review of science outreach strategies north and south. Armagh: Centre for Cross Border Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills (DES) (1999). Primary school curriculum: Science. Social, environmental and scientific education. Dublin: Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation (DJEI) (2015). Enterprise 2025 Ireland’s National Enterprise Policy 2015–2025 Summary Report. Retrieved from https://www.djei.ie/en/Publications/Publication-files/Enterprise-2025-Summary-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Discover Primary Science and Maths (DPSM) (2014). About discover primary science and maths. Retrieved from http://www.primaryscience.ie/about.php
   Google Scholar
• Eivers, E., & Clerkin, A. (2013). PIRLS and TIMSS 2011: Overview. In E. Eivers & A. Clerkin (Eds.), National schools, international contexts: Beyond the PIRLS and TIMSS test results. (pp. 1–13). Dublin: Educational Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011). Progress towards the common European objectives in education and training. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2016). Science education. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/science-education
   Google Scholar
• Fallik, O., Rosenfeld, S., & Eylon, B. S. (2013). School and out-of-school science: A model for bridging the gap. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 69–91. doi:10.1080/03057267.2013.822166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleer, M. (2006). Early childhood teacher education. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice (pp. 107–124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fortus, D., & Vedder-Weiss, D. (2014). Measuring students’ continuing motivation for science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(4), 497–522. doi:10.1002/tea.21136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, O. D. (2008). Categories. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 71–72). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hampden-Thompson, G., & Bennett, J. (2013). Science Teaching and Learning Science Science Teaching and Learning Activities and Students’ Engagement in Science, (December), 37–41. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.608093
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2004). The seven principles of sustainable leadership. Educational Leadership, 61(7), 8–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen, E. K., Jensen, F., & Sjaastad, J. (2015). The role of out-of-school experiences and targeted recruitment efforts in Norwegian science and technology students’ educational choice. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Inspectors of Schools (1999). Improving science education. Edinburgh: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Holmegaard, H. T., Madsen, L. M., & Ulriksen, L. (2014). To choose or not to choose science: Constructions of desirable identities among young people considering a STEM higher education programme. International Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 186–215. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.749362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itzek-Greulich, H., Flunger, B., Vollmer, C., Nagengast, B., Rehm, M., & Trautwein, U. (2015). Effects of a science center outreach lab on school students’ achievement – Are student lab visits needed when they teach what students can learn at school? Learning and Instruction, 38, 43–52. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jocz, J. A., Zhai, J., & Tan, A. L. (2014). Inquiry learning in the Singaporean context: Factors affecting student interest in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2596–2618. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.908327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. doi:10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, D. E., & Konstantopoulos, S. (2010). The impact of a project-based science curriculum on minority student achievement, attitudes, and careers: The effects of teacher content and pedagogical content knowledge and inquiry-based practices. Science Education, 94(5), 855–887. doi:10.1002/sce.20391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., & Tan, A. L. (2011). Rethinking difficulties of teaching inquiry-based practical work: Stories from elementary pre-service teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 33(4), 465–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, J. (2006). Relating learning theories to pedagogy for preservice elementary science. In K. Appleton (Ed.), (2006). Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice (pp. 91–106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Koksal, E. A., & Berberoglu, G. (2014). The effect of guided-inquiry instruction on 6th grade Turkish students’ achievement, science process skills, and attitudes toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 66–78. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.721942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, K. E. (2002). An analysis of elementary teachers’ beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science. Science Education, 86(1), 1–22. doi:10.1002/sce.1042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, S., Smyth, E., & Banks, J. (2012). The primary classroom: Insights from the growing up in Ireland study. Dublin: ESRI.
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, C., & Tobin, K. (1997). A social constructivist perspective on learning environments. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 193–208. doi:10.1080/0950069970190205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzes, J. J., Marcum, B., Messerschmidt-Yates, C., & Mark, A. (2013). Enhancing self-efficacy in elementary science teaching with professional learning communities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(7), 1201–1218. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9320-1
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro, B., Martins, I., Souza, A., & Carvalho, F. (2016). The issue of the arrangement of new environments for science education through collaborative actions between schools, museums and science centres in the Brazilian context of teacher training. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1–19. doi:10.1007/s11422-014-9638-4
   Google Scholar
• Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2003). Crossing borders: Learning and teaching primary science in the pre-service to in-service transition. International Journal of Science Education, 25(7), 879–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation (NSF) (1998). Science policy seminar series. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/news/speeches/colwell/rc80916.htm
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, E. S., & Koballa, T. (2006). Framing issues of elementary science teacher education: Critical conversations. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice (pp. 107–124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ó Slatara, T., & Morgan, M. (2004). The future of small schools and teaching principalship in Ireland, Interim Report February 2004. Irish Primary Principals’ Network, St Patrick’s College.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. T. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. Qualitative Report, 12(2), 281–316.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2010). Talis, teaching and learning international survey 2008 technical report. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/44978960.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections (Vol. 13). London: The Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2010). Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say: What research has to say. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from http://public.eblib.com/EBLPublic/PublicView.do?ptiID=744152
   Google Scholar
• Palys, T. (2008). Purposive sampling. In L. M. Given (Eds.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, E., & DeWitt, J. (2015). Attitudes, interest and factors influencing STEM enrolment behaviour: An overview of relevant literature. In Understanding student participation and choice in science and technology education (pp. 63–88). AZ Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, B. (2011). The concept attainment strategy: Inductive lessons on arachnids and isomers. The Science Teacher, 78(1), 51–55.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., & Jane, L. (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Savasci, F., & Berlin, D. F. (2012). Science teacher beliefs and classroom practice related to constructivism in different school settings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(1), 65–86. doi:10.1007/s10972-011-9262-z
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1963). Biological sciences curriculum study: Biology teachers’ handbook. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) (2014a). Education and public engagement. Retrieved from http://www.sfi.ie/discover-science-engineering-dse
   Google Scholar
• Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) (2014b). Three-year plan to deliver increase in uptake of science, technology, engineering and maths. Retrieved from http://www.sfi.ie/news-resources/press-releases/three-year-plan-to-increase-in-uptake-of-stem.html and http://www.sfi.ie/assets/media/files/downloads/News%20and%20Events/Press%20Releases/Smart%20Futures%20Strategy%202014-16.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stocklmayer, S. M., Rennie, L. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (2010). The roles of the formal and informal sectors in the provision of effective science education. Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (1994). Working relations of technology production and use. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2, 21–39.
   Google Scholar
• Taba, H., & Spalding, W. B. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, E., Barton, A. C., Kang, H., & O’Neill, T. (2013). Desiring a career in STEM-related fields: How middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities-in-practice in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 1143–1179. doi:10.1002/tea.21123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (Eds.). (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, M. M., & Gregory, B. (2013). Elementary teachers’ classroom practices and beliefs in relation to US science education reform: Reflections from within. International Journal of Science Education, 35(11), 1800–1823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillema, H. H., & Kremer-Hayon, L. (2002). “Practising what we preach” – teacher educators’ dilemmas in promoting self-regulated learning: A cross case comparison. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(5), 593–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tressel, G. W. (1994). Thirty years of “improvement” in precollege math and science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3(2), 77–88. doi:10.1007/BF01575187
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., Osborne, J. F., Williams, G., Tytler, K., & Cripps Clark, J. (2008). Opening up pathways: Engagement in STEM across the primary-secondary school transition. Canberra: Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Varley, J., Murphy, C., & Veale, O. (2008). Science in primary schools, Phase 1. Final report. Bournemouth: NCCA.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice, learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175. doi:10.3102/00346543072002131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods-Townsend, K., Christodoulou, A., Rietdijk, W., Byrne, J., Griffiths, J. B., & Grace, M. M. (2016). Meet the scientist: The value of short interactions between scientists and students. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 6(1), 89–113. doi:10.1080/21548455.2015.1016134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, H. G., & Kim, M. (2010). Collaborative reflection through dilemma cases of science practical work during practicum. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 283–301. doi:10.1080/09500690802516538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar