Unintended knowledge learnt in primary science practical lessons

References

• Apple, M. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., & Huston, A. C. (1961). Identification as a process of incidental learning. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(2), 311–318. doi: 10.1037/h0040351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley, M. L. (1995). Making the most of the teachable moment: Carpe diem. Science Activities, 32(3), 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, T., Oh, P. S., & Neilson, D. (2012). Discursive modes and their pedagogical functions in model-based inquiry (MBI) classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2393–2419. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.704552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charbonnier, E., & Truong, N. (2014). How much time do primary and lower secondary students spend in the classroom? Education Indicators in Focus, 22. Retrieved May 10, 2016, from http://www.oecd.org/edu/skills-beyond-school/educationindicatorsinfocus.htm
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (1994). The educational imagination: On design and evaluation of school programs (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., Hardy, I., Beinbrech, C., Shavelson, R. J., & Shemwell, J. T. (2010). A framework for analyzing evidence-based reasoning in science classroom discourse. Educational Assessment, 15(3–4), 175–196. doi: 10.1080/10627197.2010.530553
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C., Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Gunstone, R. (2000). What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 655–675. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200009)37:7<655::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hass, G. (1987). Curriculum planning: A new approach (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (1996). Laboratory work as scientific method: Three decades of confusion and distortion. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(2), 115–135. doi: 10.1080/0022027980280201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379–432. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI1704_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyun, E., & Marshall, J. D. (2003). Teachable-moment-oriented curriculum practice in early childhood education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(1), 111–127. doi: 10.1080/00220270210125583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. W. (1990). Life in classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, E. (2006). Instructional strategies for improving pseudo-serendipity. Journal of Educational Technology, 22(3), 95–115.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A. (1992). Epistemology, practical work and academic skills in science education. Science & Education, 1(3), 273–299. doi: 10.1007/BF00430277
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S-K., Lee, G.-H., & Shin, M.-K. (2011). Exploring elementary teachers’ epistemological understandings of school science lab practices. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 28(2), 21–49.
   Google Scholar
• Leem, Y. W., & Kim, Y.-S. (2013). A historical study on the Korean science curriculum for the elementary and secondary schools. Biology Education, 41(3), 483–503. doi: 10.15717/bioedu.2013.41.3.483
   Google Scholar
• Lenox, R. S. (1985). Educating for the serendipitous discovery. Journal of Chemical Education, 62(4), 282–285. doi: 10.1021/ed062p282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louca, L. T., Zacharia, Z. C., & Constantinou, C. P. (2011). In quest of productive modeling-based learning discourse in elementary school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 919–951. doi: 10.1002/tea.20435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Na, J., & Song, J. (2014). Why everyday experience? Interpreting primary students’ science discourse from the perspective of John Dewey. Science & Education, 23(5), 1031–1049. doi: 10.1007/s11191-013-9637-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M., Jacobs, C., & Cuban, L. (1992). Concepts of curriculum. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 4(4), 202–205. doi: 10.1080/10401339209539565
   Google Scholar
• Nott, M., & Smith, R. (1995). ‘Talking your way out of it’, ‘rigging’ and ‘conjuring’: What science teachers do when practicals go wrong. International Journal of Science Education, 17(3), 399–410. doi: 10.1080/0950069950170310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, P. S., Lee, S.-K., & Kim, C.-J. (2007). Case of science classroom discourse analyzed from the perspective of knowledge-sharing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(4), 297–308.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., Martin, S., & Chu, H.-E. (2015). Examining how structures shape teacher and student agency in science classrooms in an innovative middle school: Implications for policy and practice. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 773–790. doi: 10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0773
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., Song, J., & Abrahams, I. (2016). Unintended learning in primary school practical science lessons from Polanyi’s perspective of intellectual passion. Science & Education, 25(1), 3–20. doi: 10.1007/s11191-015-9788-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, Y., Choi, R., & Kim, D. (2014). A study on the process of unified instructions in Korean elementary school based on grounded theory. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 22(4), 279–299.
   Google Scholar
• She, H. C. (1995). Elementary and middle school students’ image of science and scientists related to current science textbooks in Taiwan. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(4), 283–294. doi: 10.1007/BF02211260
   Google Scholar
• Shon, M.-H., & Moon, S.-S. (2011). Understanding of ethnomethodology as an analytic programme of members’ knowledge-in-use. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(2), 45–68. doi: 10.15708/kscs.29.2.201106.003
   Google Scholar
• Siry, C., & Martin, S. N. (2014). Facilitating reflexivity in preservice science teacher education using video analysis and cogenerative dialogue in field-based methods courses. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(5), 481–508. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2014.1201a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, R. W. (1957). The curriculum then and now. The Elementary School Journal, 57(7), 364–374.
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2004). From ‘try it and see’ to strategic exploration: Characterizing young children’s scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(1), 94–118. doi: 10.1002/tea.10126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–595.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S., Newton, J., & Chang, A. (2013). Incidental learning of collocation. Language Learning, 63(1), 91–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00729.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellington, J. (1998). Practical work in science: Time for a reappraisal. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science. Which way now? (pp. 3–15). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2002). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86(5), 601–623. doi: 10.1002/sce.10036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, I., Kim, S., & Cho, H. (2007). Analysis of the types of laboratory instruction in elementary and secondary schools science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(3), 235–241.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, I.-H., Jeong, J.-W., Hur, M., Kim, Y.-S., Kim, J.-S., Cho, H.-J., … Oh, C.-H. (2006). An analysis of laboratory instructions in elementary school science. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(3), 281–295.
   Google Scholar