The role of socioscientific issues in biology teaching: from the perspective of teachers

References

• Barrett, S. E., & Nieswandt, M. (2010). Teaching about ethics through socioscientific issues in physics and chemistry: Teacher candidates’ beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 380–401. doi:10.1002/tea.20343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. (2007). Writing for social scientists (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bryce, T., & Gray, D. (2004). Tough acts to follow: The challenges to science teachers presented by biotechnological progress. International Journal of Science Education, 26(6), 717–733. doi:10.1080/0950069032000138833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, R. T., & Price, R. F. (1996). Science teachers’ social conscience and the role of controversial issues in the teaching of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 319–333. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199603)33:3<319::AID-TEA5 > 3.0.CO;2-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, V. (2011). A case study of the impact of introducing socio-scientific issues into a reproduction unit in a catholic girls’ school in Socio-scientific issues in the classroom. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Day, S. P., & Bryce, T. G. K. (2011). Does the discussion of socio-scientific issues require a paradigm shift in science teachers’ thinking? International Journal of Science Education, 33(12), 1675–1702. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.519804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dori, Y. J., Tal, R. T., & Tsaushu, M. (2003). Teaching biotechnology through case studies – Can we improve higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors? Science Education, 87(6), 767–793. doi:10.1002/sce.10081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastwood, J. L., Schlegel, W. M., & Cook, K. L. (2011). Effects of an interdisciplinary program on students’ reasoning with socioscientific issues and perceptions of their learning experiences in socio-scientific issues in the classroom. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education (pp. 89–126). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Eijkelhof, H., & Kapteijn, M. (2000). Algemene Natuurwetenschappen (ANW): A new course on public understanding of science for senior general secondary education in the Netherlands. In R. Cross & P. Fensham (Eds.), Science and the citizen: For educators and the public (pp. 189–199). Fitzroy: Arena.
   Google Scholar
• Eilks, I., Nielsen, J. A., & Hofstein, A. (2014). Learning about the role and function of science in public debate as an essential component of scientific literacy. In C. Bruguière, A. Tiberghien, & P. Clément (red.), Topics and trends in current science education: 9th ESERA Conference Selected Contributions. (pp. 85–100). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. (2008). Exploring preservice elementary teachers’ critique and adaptation of science curriculum materials in respect to socioscientific issues. Science & Education, 17(8–9), 829–854. doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9080-z
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Ratcliffe, M. (2005). Socioscientific issues and the quality of exploratory talk – what can be learned from schools involved in a ‘collapsed day’ project? Curriculum Journal, 16(4), 439–453. doi:10.1080/09585170500384396
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2013). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (2008). Doing interviews. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarowitz, R., & Bloch, I. (2005). Awareness of societal issues among high school biology Teachers teaching genetics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(5–6), 437–457. doi:10.1007/s10956-005-0220-4
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Choi, K. (2006). Korean science teachers’ perceptions of the introduction of socio-scientific issues into the science curriculum. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6(2), 97–117. doi:10.1080/14926150609556691
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., & Witz, K. G. (2009). Science teachers’ inspiration for teaching socio-scientific issues: Disconnection with reform efforts. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), 931–960. doi:10.1080/09500690801898903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, R., & Turner, S. (2001). The teaching of social and ethical issues in the school curriculum, arising from developments in biomedical research: A research study of teachers. London: The Wellcome Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King’s College London.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2013). Bekendtgørelse nr. 776 af 26/6/2013. [Executive order no. 776 of 26/6/2013]. Retrieved from https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=152507#Bil12
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. A. (2013a). Dialectical features of students’ argumentation: A critical review of argumentation studies in science education. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 371–393. doi: 10.1007/s11165-011-9266-x doi: 10.1007/s11165-011-9266-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. A. (2013b). Delusions about evidence: On why scientific evidence should not be the main concern in socioscientific decision-making. Canadian Journal for Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 13(4), 373–385. doi: 10.1080/14926156.2013.845323 doi: 10.1080/14926156.2013.845323
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. A., & Dolin, J. (2016). Evaluering mellem mestring og præstation [Assessment between mastery and performance]. MONA, 2016(1), 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Parchmann, I., Gräsel, C., Baer, A., Nentwig, P., Demuth, R., & Ralle, B. (2006). “Chemie im Kontext”: A symbiotic implementation of a context-based teaching and learning approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1041–1062. doi:10.1080/09500690600702512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36(1), 1–44. doi:10.1080/03057260108560166
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1–42. doi:10.1080/03057260802681839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2011). Socio-scientific issues-based education: What we know about science education in the context of SSI. In Socio-scientific issues in the classroom (pp. 355–369). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M., & Allspaw, K. M. (2006). Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 353–376. doi:10.1002/tea.20142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2003). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education, 88(1), 4–27. doi:10.1002/sce.10101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, K. J., & Rennie, L. J. (2013). A pedagogical model for ethical inquiry into socioscientific issues in science. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 253–274. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9248-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonneaux, L. (2014). Questions socialement vives and socio-scientific issues: New trends of research to meet the training needs of postmodern society. In C. Bruguière, A. Tiberghien, & P. Clément (Eds.), Topics and trends in current science education: 9th ESERA Conference selected contributions (pp. 37–54). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D., Applebaum, S. M., & Sadler, T. D. (2011). Enacting a socioscientific issues classroom: Transformative transformations. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, Learning and Research (pp. 277–305). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. doi:10.1002/sce.20048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar