2,978
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Primary teachers conducting inquiry projects: effects on attitudes towards teaching science and conducting inquiry

, , &
Pages 238-256 | Received 30 May 2016, Accepted 23 Dec 2016, Published online: 18 Jan 2017

References

  • van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., & Walma van der Molen, J. H. (2013). Measuring primary teachers’ attitudes toward teaching science: Development of the dimensions of attitude toward science (DAS) instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 577–600. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.755576
  • van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., & Walma van der Molen, J. H. (2015). Improving primary teachers’ attitudes toward science by attitude-focused professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 710–734. doi:10.1002/tea.21218
  • van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., Walma van der Molen, J. H., & Asma, L. (2012). Primary teachers’ attitudes toward science: A new theoretical framework. Science Education, 96, 158–182. doi:10.1002/sce.20467
  • Admiraal, W., Smit, B., & Zwart, R. (2013). Academisch docentschap in het basis- en voortgezet onderwijs: Aard en betekenis van onderzoek van docenten naar hun onderwijspraktijk [The academic teacher in primary and secondary education: Nature and meaning of teachers’ research into their own practice]. Final report PROO-review 411-11-691. Leiden: ICLON, Universiteit Leiden.
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Appleton, K., & Kindt, I. (1999). Why teach primary science? Influences on beginning teachers’ practices. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 155–168. doi:10.1080/095006999290769
  • Bibi, F., Lqbal, H. M., & Majid, N. (2012). Attitude of prospective teachers toward research: Implications for teacher education in Pakistan. Contemporary Educational Researches Journal, 2(1), 8–14. Retrieved from http://sproc.org/archives/index.php/cerj/article/viewArticle/952
  • Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33, 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003
  • Cobern, W. W., & Loving, C. C. (2002). Investigation of preservice elementary teachers’ thinking about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 1016–1031. doi:10.1002/tea.10052
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (second edition). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140
  • Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Group/Thomson Learning.
  • Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2002). Leading schools in a data-rich world. In K. A. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 1003–1022). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  • Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering Statistics using SPSS: and sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll (third edition). London: Sage publications.
  • Goodnough, K. (2011). Examining the long-term impact of collaborative action research on teacher identity and practice: The perceptions of K-12 teachers. Educational Action Research, 19, 73–86. doi:10.1080/09650792.2011.547694
  • Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools (A research report for the department of education, training and youth affairs). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
  • Haefner, L. A., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2004). Learning by doing? Prospective elementary teachers’ developing understandings of scientific inquiry and science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1653–1674. doi:10.1080/0950069042000230709
  • Haney, J. J., & Lumpe, A. T. (1995). A teacher professional development framework guided by reform policies, teachers’ needs, and research. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 6, 187–196. doi:10.1007/BF02614642
  • Harlen, W., & Holroyd, C. (1997). Primary teachers’ understanding of concepts of science: Impact on confidence and teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 93–105. doi:10.1080/0950069970190107
  • Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of 800+ meta-analyses on achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Jarrett, O. S. (1999). Science interest and confidence among preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11, 49–59. doi:10.1007/BF03173790
  • Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2004). Primary teachers’ changing attitudes and cognition during a two-year science in-service program and their effect on pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1787–1811. doi:10.1080/0950069042000243763
  • Kemmis, S. (2009). Action research as a practice-based practice. Educational Action Research, 17, 463–474. doi:10.1080/09650790903093284
  • Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014).  Meaningful assessment of learners’ understandings about scientific inquiry. The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 65–83. doi:10.1002/tea.21125
  • van der Linden, W., Bakx, A., Ros, A., Beijaard, D., & van den Bergh, L. (2015). The development of student teachers’ research knowledge, beliefs and attitude. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41, 4–18. doi:10.1080/02607476.2014.992631
  • Mant, J., Wilson, H., & Coates, D. (2007). The effect of increasing conceptual challenge in primary science lessons on pupils’ achievement and engagement. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1707–1719. doi:10.1080/09500690701537973
  • Melear, C. T., Goodlaxson, J. D., Warne, T. R., & Hickok, L. G. (2000). Teaching preservice science teachers how to do science: Responses to the research experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 77–90. doi:10.1023/A:1009479915967
  • Morrison, J. A. (2008). Individual inquiry investigations in an elementary science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 117–134. doi:10.1007/s10972-007-9086-z
  • Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (1996). Breaking the cycle: Preparing elementary teachers to teach science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 8, 17–38. doi:10.1007/BF03173739
  • Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237–257. doi:10.3102/01623737026003237
  • Oolbekkink-Marchand, H. W., van der Steen, J., & Nijveldt, M. (2014). A study of the quality of practitioner research in secondary education: Impact on teacher and school development. Educational Action Research, 22, 122–139. doi:10.1080/09650792.2013.854175
  • Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 177–196. doi:10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes toward science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049–1079. doi:10.1080/0950069032000032199
  • Palmer, D. H. (2002). Factors contributing to attitude exchange amongst preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 86, 122–138. doi:10.1002/sce.10007
  • Roth, W., McGinn, M. K., & Bowen, G. M. (1998). How prepared are preservice teachers to teach scientific inquiry? Levels of performance in scientific representation practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9, 25–48. doi:10.1023/A:1009465505918
  • Sanger, M. J. (2008). How does inquiry-based instruction affect teaching majors’ views about teaching and learning science? Journal of Chemical Education, 85, 297–302. doi:10.1021/ed085p297
  • Shapiro, B. L. (1996). A case study of change in elementary student teacher thinking during an independent investigation in science: Learning about the “Face of science that does not yet know”. Science Education, 80, 535–560. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199609)80:5<535::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-C
  • Skamp, K. (1991). Primary science and technology: How confident are teachers? Research in Science Education, 21, 290–299. doi:10.1007/BF02360483
  • Smith, D. C., & Anderson, C. W. (1999). Appropriating scientific practices and discourses with future elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 755–776. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199909)36:7<755::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-9
  • Tai, R. H., Qi Liu, C., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). CAREER CHOICE: Enhanced: Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312(5777), 1143–1144. doi:10.1126/science.1128690
  • Tobin, K., & Tippins, D. (1993). Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 3–21). Washington, DC: AAAS Press.
  • Tosun, T. (2000). The beliefs of preservice elementary teachers toward science and science teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 100, 374–379. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb18179.x
  • Watson, D. (1992). Correcting for acquiescent response bias in the absence of a balanced scale, an application to class consciousness. Sociological Methods Research, 21, 52–88. doi:10.1177/0049124192021001003
  • Woods-McConney, A., Oliver, M. C., McConney, A., Schibeci, R., & Maor, D. (2014). Science engagement and literacy: A retrospective analysis for students in Canada and Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 1588–1608. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.871658
  • Yager, R. E. (1997). Science education a science? [Guest editorial]. Electronic Journal of Science Education. 2(1). Retrieved from http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/7571/5338
  • Yates, S., & Goodrum, D. (1990). How confident are primary school teachers in teaching science? Research in Science Education, 20, 300–305. doi:10.1007/BF02620506
  • Young, B. J., & Kellogg, T. (1993). Science attitudes and preparation of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 77, 279–291. doi:10.1002/sce.3730770303
  • Zeichner, K. M. (2003). Teacher research as professional development for P–12 educators in the USA. Educational Action Research, 11, 301–326. doi:10.1080/09650790300200211
  • Zeichner, K., & Noffke, S. (2001). Practitioner research. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 298–329). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.