Rasch analysis for psychometric improvement of science attitude rating scales

References

• Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (Eds.). (2012). Methods and procedures in TIMSS and PIRLS 2011. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, L., & Chen, J. A. (2016). Do high-ability students disidentify with science? A descriptive study of U.S. ninth graders in 2009. Science Education, 100(1), 57–77. doi: 10.1002/sce.21197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bainer, D. L., & Smith, R. M. (1999). Developing a unidimensional instrument to measure the effectiveness of school-based partnerships. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3(3), 248–265.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blalock, C. L., Lichtenstein, M. J., Owen, S., Pruski, L., Marshall, C., & Toepperwein, M. (2008). In pursuit of validity: A comprehensive review of science attitude instruments 1935–2005. International Journal of Science Education, 30(7), 961–977. doi: 10.1080/09500690701344578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, W. J., Staver, J. S., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in human sciences. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, W. J., Townsend, J. S., & Staver, J. (2011). Using Rasch theory to guide the practice of survey development and survey data analysis in science education and to inform science reform efforts: An exemplar utilizing STEBI self-efficacy data. Science Education, 95(2), 258–280. doi: 10.1002/sce.20413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-Y., & Cheng, W.-Y. (2008). Science achievement and students’ self-confidence and interest in science: A Taiwanese representative sample study. International Journal of Science Education, 30(9), 1183–1200. doi: 10.1080/09500690701435384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, M. L., & Engelhard, G. (2016). Examining teachers’ sense of efficacy scale at the item level with Rasch measurement model. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(2), 177–191. doi: 10.1177/0734282915593835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwell, M. R., & Gatti, G. G. (2001). Rescaling ordinal data to interval data in educational research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 105–131. doi: 10.3102/00346543071001105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jocz, J. A., Zhai, J., & Tan, A. L. (2014). Inquiry learning in the Singaporean context: Factors affecting student interest in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2596–2618. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2014.908327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kind, P. M., Jones, K., & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 871–893. doi: 10.1080/09500690600909091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. S., Grossman, J., & Krishnan, A. (2008). Cultural relevance of adult attachment: Rasch modeling of the revised experiences in close relationships in a Korean sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(5), 824–844. doi: 10.1177/0013164407313367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, F. K. S. (2002). Behind the high achievement of East Asian students. Educational Research and Evaluation, 8(1), 87–108. doi: 10.1076/edre.8.1.87.6920
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (2004). Optimal rating scale category effectiveness. In E. V. Smith, Jr. and R. M. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to Rasch measurement (pp. 258–278). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (2014). WINSTEPS (Version 3.81.0) [Computer Software]. Chicago, IL: Winsteps.com.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M., & Wright, B. D. (1989). The ‘length’ of a logit. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 3(2), 54–55.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X. (2010). Using and developing measurement instruments in science education: A Rasch Modeling approach. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Masters, G. N. (1988). Item discrimination: When more is worse. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25, 15–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1988.tb00288.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, O. M., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Stance, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International results in science. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2003). Children’s perceptions of school science. School Science Review, 84(308), 109–116.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, I., Neumann, K., & Nehm, R. (2011). Evaluating instrument quality in science education: Rasch-based analyses of a nature of science test. International Journal of Science Education, 33(10), 1373–1405. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.511297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noll, V. H. (1935). Measuring the scientific attitude. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 30, 145–154. doi: 10.1037/h0059829
   Google Scholar
• Oon, P. T., & Subramaniam, R. (2013). Singapore school students’ views about physics according to whether they intend to choose this subject as a tertiary field of study: A Rasch Analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 35(1), 86–118. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.718098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000032199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: A systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85–129. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2014.881626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Paedagogiske Institut.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romine, W. L., & Walter, E. M. (2014). Assessing the efficacy of the measure of understanding of macroevolution as a valid toold for undergraduate non-science majors. International Journal of Science Education, 36(17), 2872–2891. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2014.938376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacker, R. E. (1996). Disattenuating correlation coefficients. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 10(1), 479.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. M. (1996). A comparison of methods for determining dimensionality in Rasch measurement. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 3, 25–40. doi: 10.1080/10705519609540027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sondergeld, T. A., & Johnson, C. C. (2014). Using Rasch measurement for the development and use of affective assessments in science education research. Science Education, 98(4), 581–613. doi: 10.1002/sce.21118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swarat, S., Ortony, A., & Revelle, W. (2012). Activity matters: Understanding student interest in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 515–537. doi: 10.1002/tea.21010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639–654. doi: 10.1080/0950069042000323737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velayutham, S., & Aldridge, J. M. (2013). Influence of psychosocial classroom environment on students’ motivation and self-regulation in science learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 507–527. doi: 10.1007/s11165-011-9273-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velayutham, S., Aldridge, J., & Fraser, B. (2011). Development and validation of an instrument to measure students’ motivation and self-regulation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 33(15), 2159–2179. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.541529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagler, A., & Wagler, R. (2013). Assessing the lack of measurement invariance for the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution. International Journal of Science Education, 35(13), 2278–2298. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2013.808779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T. L., & Berlin, D. (2010). Construction and validation of an instrument to measure Taiwanese elementary students’ attitudes toward their science class. International Journal of Science Education, 32(18), 2413–2428. doi: 10.1080/09500690903431561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D. (1999). Fundamental measurement for psychology. In S. E. Embretson& S. L. Hershberger (Eds.), The new rules of measurement: What every educator and psychologist should know (pp. 65–104). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1992). Combining and splitting categories. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 6, 233–235.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1996). Reasonable mean-square fit values, Part 2. In J. M. Linacre (Ed.), Rasch Measurement Transactions (p. 370). Chicago, IL: Mesa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D., & Master, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago, IL: Mesa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zenisky, A., Hambleton, R. K., & Robin, F. (2004). DIF detection and interpretation in large-scale science assessments: Informing item writing practices. Educational Assessment, 9(1–2), 61–78. doi: 10.1080/10627197.2004.9652959
   Google Scholar