2,340
Views
31
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The effect of inquiry-based learning experiences on adolescents’ science-related career aspiration in the Finnish context

ORCID Icon &
Pages 1669-1689 | Received 10 May 2016, Accepted 30 Jun 2017, Published online: 28 Jul 2017

References

  • Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1023/A:1015171124982
  • Arnold, J. C., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2014). Understanding students’ experiments—What kind of support do they need in inquiry tasks? International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2719–2749. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2014.930209
  • Asparouhov, T. (2005). Sampling weights in latent variable modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12, 411–434. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1203_4
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30–33.
  • Berg, C. A. R., Bergendahl, V. C. B., Lundberg, B. K. S., & Tibell, L. A. E. (2003). Benefiting from an open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 351–372. doi: 10.1080/09500690210145738
  • Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15, 1–40. doi: 10.1023/A:1021302408382
  • Bowen, N., & Guo, S. (2011). Structural Equation Modeling. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race, and gender in middle school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7, 269–283.
  • Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 485–499. doi: 10.1002/tea.20131
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  • Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task values and the Eccles et al. model of achievement related choices. In A. J. Elliott & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York: Guilford.
  • Finnish National Board of Education (FNBE). (2004). National core curriculum for basic education 2004. [FIN].
  • Finnish National Board of Education (FNBE). (2014). National core curriculum for basic education 2014. [FIN].
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi: 10.2307/3151312
  • Fouad, N., Hackett, G., Smith, P., Kantamneni, N., Fitzpatrick, M., Haag, S., & Spencer, D. (2010). Barriers and supports for continuing in mathematics and science: Gender and educational level differences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 361–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2010.06.004
  • Fouad, N., & Smith, P. (1996). A test of a social cognitive model for middle school students: Math and science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 338–346. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.43.3.338
  • Gainor, K. A., & Lent, R. W. (1998). Social cognitive expectations and racial identity attitudes in predicting the math choice intentions of Black college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 403–413. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.45.4.403
  • Geiser, C. (2013). Data analysis with Mplus. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Holmegaard, H., Madsen, L., & Ulriksen, L. (2014). To choose or not to choose science: Constructions of desirable identities among young people considering a STEM higher education programme. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 186–215. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.749362
  • Kang, J., & Keinonen, T. (2016). Examining factors affecting implementation of inquiry-based learning in Finland and South Korea. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 74, 31–48.
  • Kang, J., & Keinonen, T. (2017). The effect of student-centered approaches on students’ interest and achievement in science: Relevant topic-based, open and guided inquiry-based, and discussion-based approaches. Research in Science Education, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9590-2
  • Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundation and extensions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kelloway, K. (2015). Using Mplus for structural equation modeling: A researcher's guide (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
  • Koksal, E. A., & Berberoglu, G. (2014). The effect of guided- inquiry instruction on 6th grade Turkish students’ achievement, science process skills, and attitudes toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 66–78. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.721942
  • Lavonen, J., & Juuti, K. (2016). Science at Finnish compulsory school. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), The miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (pp. 131–147). Rotterdam: Sense.
  • Lavonen, J., & Laaksonen, S. (2009). Context of teaching and learning school science in Finland: Reflections on PISA 2006 results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 922–944. doi: 10.1002/tea.20339
  • Lederman, J. S. (2009). Teaching scientific inquiry: Exploration, directed, guided, and open-ended levels. In National geographic science: Best practices and research base (pp. 8–20). Hapton-Brown.
  • Lee, H., & Butler, N. (2003). Making authentic science accessible to students. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 923–948. doi: 10.1080/09500690305023
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122. doi:10.1006/ jvbe.1994.1027 doi: 10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
  • Li, C.-H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
  • Lopatto, D. (2010). Science in solution: The impact of undergraduate research on student learning. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation for Science Advancement. Retrieved April 30, 2012, from http://web.grinnell.edu/sureiii/Science_in_Solution_Lopatto.pdf
  • Lunsford, E., Melear, C. T., Roth, W.-M., Perkins, M., & Hickok, L. G. (2007). Proliferation of inscriptions and transformations among pre-service science teachers engaged in authentic science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 538–564. doi: 10.1002/tea.20160
  • Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1997). Coursework selection: Relations to academic self-concept and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 691–720. doi: 10.3102/00028312034004691
  • Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry: Exploring the many types of inquiry in the science classroom. Science Teacher, 69(2), 34–37.
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Authors.
  • National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Nugent, G., Barker, B., Welch, G., Grandgenett, N., Wu, C. R., & Nelson, C. (2015). A model of factors contributing to STEM learning and career orientation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 1067–1088. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1017863
  • OECD. (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world: Volume 1: Analysis. Paris: Author.
  • OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results (volume I): excellence and equity in education. Paris: Author.
  • Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections (Vol. 13). London: Nuffield Foundation.
  • Parker, P., Marsh, H., Ciarrochi, J., Marshall, S., & Abduljabbar, A. (2013). Juxtaposing math self- efficacy and self-concept as predictors of long-term achievement outcomes. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 34, 29–48. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2013.797339
  • PRIMAS. (2011). Promoting inquiry-based learning in mathematics and science education across Europe. Kiel: IPN. Retrieved March 21, 2013, from http://www.primas-project.eu/
  • Roth, W. M., McGinn, M. K., & Bowen, G. M. (1998). How prepared are preservice teachers to teach scientific inquiry? Levels of performance in scientific representation practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(1), 25–48. doi: 10.1023/A:1009465505918
  • Russell, S., Hancock, M. P., & McCullough, J. (2007). The pipeline: Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science, 316, 548–549. doi: 10.1126/science.1140384
  • Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2012). Which type of inquiry project do high school biology students prefer: Open or guided? Research in Science Education, 42(5), 831–848. doi: 10.1007/s11165-011-9222-9
  • Schaub, M., & Tokar, D. M. (2005). The role of personality and learning experiences in social cognitive career theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 304–325. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.09.005
  • Schoon, I. (2001). Teenage job aspirations and career attainment in adulthood: A 17-year follow-up study of teenagers who aspired to become scientists, health professionals, or engineers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25(2), 124–132. doi: 10.1080/01650250042000186
  • Shin, J., Lee, H., McCarthy-Donovan, A., Hwang, H., Yim, S., & Seo, E. (2015). Home and motivational factors related to science-career pursuit: Gender differences and gender similarities. International Journal of Science Education, 37(9), 1478–1503. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1042941
  • Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students’ attitudes to science. In J. Osborne & J. Dillon (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say (2nd ed., pp. 238–258). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Simpkins, S., Davis-Kean, P., & Eccles, J. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42, 70–83. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70
  • Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Career Choice: Enhanced: Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312(5777), 1143–1144. doi: 10.1126/science.1128690
  • Taskinen, P. H., Schütte, K., & Prenzel, M. (2013). Adolescents’ motivation to select an academic science-related career: The role of school factors, individual interest, and science self-concept. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(8), 717–733. doi: 10.1080/13803611.2013.853620
  • Wang, X. (2013). Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081–1121. doi: 10.3102/0002831213488622
  • Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural Equation Modeling: Applications Using Mplus. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Wild, A. (2015). Relationships between high school chemistry students’ perceptions of a constructivist learning environment and their STEM career expectations. International Journal of Science Education, 37(14), 2284–2305. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1076951
  • Zeldin, A. L., Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). A comparative study of the self-efficacy beliefs of successful men and women in mathematics, science and technology careers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 1036–1058. doi: 10.1002/tea.20195
  • Zion, M., Cohen, S., & Amir, R. (2007). The spectrum of dynamic inquiry teaching practices. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 423–447. doi: 10.1007/s11165-006-9034-5
  • Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23(4), 383–399.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.