Memorisation methods in science education: tactics to improve the teaching and learning practice

References

• Akaygun, S., & Jones, L. L. (2014). Words or pictures: A comparison of written and pictorial explanations of physical and chemical equilibria. International Journal of Science Education, 36(5), 783–807. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2013.828361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, R. J., Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (2006). Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(2), 298–313. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (1999). Human memory. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., & Stengers, H. (2006). Motivational multiword units: Rationale, mnemonic benefits, and cognitive style variables. In S. H. Foster-Cohen, M. Medved Krajnovic, & J. Miihaljevic Djigunovic (Eds.), Eurosla yearbook 6 (pp. 169–190). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, L. (2015). After watching this, your brain will not be the same. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNHBMFCzznE
   Google Scholar
• Bull, B. L., & Wittrock, M. C. (1973). Imagery in the learning of verbal definitions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 43(3), 289–293. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1973.tb02269.x
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293–332. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crone, E. (2012). Het sociale brein van de puber. Amsterdam: Prometheus.
   Google Scholar
• Cyr, M., Nee, D. E., Nelson, E., Senger, T., Jonides, J., & Malapani, C. (2017). Effects of proactive interference on non-verbal working memory. Cognitive Processing, 18(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10339-016-0784-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, T., & Fergusson-Hessler, M. M. G. (1996). Types and qualities of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 105–113. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3102-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, S., & Jolles, J. (2016). Leer het brein kennen!. Bij De Les, 12(1), 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., March, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. doi: 10.1177/1529100612453266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edens, K. M., & Potter, E. (2003). Using descriptive drawings as a conceptual change strategy in elementary science. School Science and Mathematics, 103(3), 135–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2003.tb18230.x
   Google Scholar
• Icht, M., & Mama, Y. (2015). The production effect in memory: A prominent mnemonic in children. Journal of Child Language, 42, 1102–1124. doi: 10.1017/S0305000914000713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Chemical education research: Where from here? University Chemistry Education, 4(1), 34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, P. (2017). Drawing for science education: An international perspective (1st ed.). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kosslyn, S. M., Jolicoeur, P., & Gluck, M. A. (1984). Pictures and names: Making the connection. Cognitive Instruction, 16(16), 243–275.
   Google Scholar
• Leutner, D., & Schmeck, A. (2014). The generative drawing principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. (2nd ed., pp. 433–448). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M., Gopie, N., Hourihan, K. L., Neary K. R., Oorschot, F., & Ozubko, J. D. (2010). The production effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(3), 671–685. doi: 10.1037/a0018785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J. (2015). Using load reduction instruction (LRI) to boost motivation and engagement. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2014a). Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 171–173. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2014b). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd. ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, S., & Hopf, M. (2017). Discovering children’s science association utilizing drawings. In P. Katz (Ed.), Drawing for science education. An international perspective. (1st ed., pp. 111–121). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D., & Canas, A. J. (2006). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them. Pensacola, FL: Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.
   Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., & Bialkova, S. (2009). Assessing information in working memory: Can the focus of attention grasp two elements at the same time? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 138, 164–187.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pals, F. F. B. (2003). Een samenvatting in beelden [Pictured abstract of learning content]. Impuls, 11(1), 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, L., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193–198. doi: 10.1037/h0049234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pol, H. J., Harskamp, E. G., Suhre, C. J., & Goedhart, M. J. (2008). The effect of hints and model answers in a student-controlled problem-solving program for secondary physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(4), 410–425. doi: 10.1007/s10956-008-9110-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presley, M., Cariligia-Bull, T., Deane, S., & Schneider, W. (1987). Short-term memory, verbal competence, and age as predictors of imagery instructional effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 43, 194–211. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(87)90059-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger III, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning. Talking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudner, M., & Rönnberg, J. (2008). The role of episodic buffer in working memory for language processing. Cognitive Processing, 9, 19–28. doi: 10.1007/s10339-007-0183-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W. (2014). Integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Multimedia learning (2nd. ed., pp. 72–103). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, Robert E. (2013). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (10th ed.). London: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• TALIS. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Paris: OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/edu/school/43023606.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van der Veen, J. (2012). Draw your physics homework? Art as a path to understanding in physics teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 356–407. doi: 10.3102/0002831211435521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meter, P. (2001). Drawing construction as a strategy for learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 129–140. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meter, P., & Garner, J. (2005). The promise and practice of learner-generated drawing: Literature review and synthesis. Educational Psychology Review, 17(4), 285–325. doi: 10.1007/s10648-005-8136-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wammes, J. D., Meade, M. E., & Fernandes, M. A. (2016). The drawing effect: Evidence for reliable and robust memory benefits in free recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(9), 1752–1776. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1094494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. E., & Bradbury, L. U. (2016). The pedagogical potential of drawing and writing in a primary science multimodal unit. International Journal of Science Education, 38(17), 2621–2641. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1255369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittrock, M. C. (1989). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345–376. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2404_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yurgelun-Todd, D. (2007). Emotional and cognitive changes during adolescence. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17(2), 251–257. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2007.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar