1,337
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Comparative study of middle school students’ attitudes towards science: Rasch analysis of entire TIMSS 2011 attitudinal data for England, Singapore and the U.S.A. as well as psychometric properties of attitudes scale

&
Pages 268-290 | Received 01 Sep 2016, Accepted 03 Dec 2017, Published online: 29 Jan 2018

References

  • Andersen, L., & Chen, J. A. (2016). Do high-ability students disidentify with science? A descriptive study of U.S. ninth graders in 2009. Science Education, 100(1), 57–77. doi: 10.1002/sce.21197
  • Barlia, L., & Beeth, M. E. (1999). High school students’ motivation to engage in conceptual change learning in science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA, March.
  • Barmby, P., Kind, P. M., & Jones, K. (2008). Examining changing attitudes in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1075–1093. doi: 10.1080/09500690701344966
  • Bathgate, M. E., Schunn, C. D., & Correnti, R. (2014). Children's motivation toward science across contexts, manner of interaction, and topic. Science Education, 98(2), 189–215. doi: 10.1002/sce.21095
  • Boffey, D. (2015). Half of all teachers threaten to quit as morale crashes. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/oct/04/half-of-teachers-consider-leaving-profession-shock-poll
  • Bond, T., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Oxford: Routledge.
  • Bryan, R. R., Glynn, S. M., & Kittleson, J. M. (2011). Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science. Science Education, 95(6), 1049–1065. doi: 10.1002/sce.20462
  • Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7–26. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.518644
  • Caleon, I. S., & Subramaniam, R. (2008). Attitudes towards science of intellectually gifted and mainstream upper primary students in Singapore. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 940–954. doi: 10.1002/tea.20250
  • Cavas, P. (2011). Factors affecting the motivation of Turkish primary students for science learning. Science Education International, 22(1), 31–42.
  • Chang, S. N., Yeung, Y. Y., & Cheng, M. H. (2009). Ninth graders’ learning interests, life experiences and attitudes towards science & technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(5), 447–457. doi: 10.1007/s10956-009-9162-6
  • Chin, C. C. (2005). First-year Pre-service teachers in Taiwan—Do they enter the teacher program with satisfactory scientific literacy and attitudes toward science? International Journal of Science Education, 27(13), 1549–1570. doi: 10.1080/09585190500186401
  • Connors, M. (2015). Low morale causes rise in number of teachers leaving field. The Virginian Pilot. Retrieved from http://pilotonline.com/news/local/education/low-morale-causes-rise-in-number-of-teachers-leaving-field/article_c0046f9b-e4c7-500d-88a4-960d11bd8184.html
  • DeBacker, T. K., & Nelson, R. M. (2000). Motivation to learn science: Differences related to gender, class type, and ability. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 245–254. doi: 10.1080/00220670009598713
  • Dhindsa, H. S., & Chung, G. (2003). Attitudes and achievement of Bruneian science students. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 907–922. doi: 10.1080/09500690305025
  • Embretson, S., & Yang, X. (2006). Automatic item generation and cognitive psychology. In C. R. Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics (Vol. 26, pp. 747–768). Amsterdam: Elsevier B. V. .
  • Francis, L. J., & Greer, J. E. (1999). Measuring attitude towards science among secondary school students: The affective domain. Research in Science & Technological Education, 17(2), 219–226. doi: 10.1080/0263514990170207
  • Fulmer, G. W. (2014). Undergraduates’ attitudes toward science and their epistemological beliefs: Positive effects of certainty and authority beliefs. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 198–206. doi: 10.1007/s10956-013-9463-7
  • George, R. (2006). A cross domain analysis of change in students’ attitudes towards science and attitudes about the utility of science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 571–589. doi: 10.1080/09500690500338755
  • Gibson, H. L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students’ attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86(5), 693–705. doi: 10.1002/sce.10039
  • Glynn, S. M. (2012). International assessment: A Rasch model and teachers’ evaluation of TIMSS science achievement items. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(10), 1321–1344. doi: 10.1002/tea.21059
  • Goh, C. B. (2016). From traders to innovators: Science and technology in Singapore since 1965. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.
  • Hafen, C. A., Allen, J. P., Mikami, A. Y., Gregory, A., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). The pivotal role of adolescent autonomy in secondary school classrooms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(3), 245–255. doi: 10.1007/s10964-011-9739-2
  • Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306
  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
  • Hofstein, A., & Welch, W. W. (1984). The stability of attitudes towards science between junior and senior high school. Research in Science & Technological Education, 2(2), 131–138. doi: 10.1080/0263514840020205
  • Hynd, J., Holschuh, S., & Nist, C. (2000). Learning complex scientific information: Motivation theory and its relation to student perceptions. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 16(1), 23–57. doi: 10.1080/105735600278051
  • Infocomm Media Development Authority Website. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.imda.gov.sg
  • Jenkins, E. W., & Nelson, N. W. (2005). Important but not for me: Students’ attitudes towards secondary school science in England. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(1), 41–57. doi: 10.1080/02635140500068435
  • Jones, M. G., Howe, A., & Rua, M. J. (2000). Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84(2), 180–192. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<180::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-X
  • Kind, P., Jones, K., & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 871–893. doi: 10.1080/09500690600909091
  • Lamb, R. L., Annetta, L., Meldrum, J., & Vallett, D. (2012). Measuring science interest: Rasch validation of the science interest survey. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(3), 643–668. doi: 10.1007/s10763-011-9314-z
  • Lee, O. (1989). Motivation to learning science in middle school classrooms. University Microfilms International (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing.
  • Lee, O., & Brophy, J. (1996). Motivational patterns observed in sixth-grade science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 585–610. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199603)33:3<303::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-X
  • Lee, Y. S., Grossman, J., & Krishnan, A. (2008). Cultural relevance of adult attachment: Rasch modeling of the revised experiences in close relationships in a Korean sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(5), 824–844. doi: 10.1177/0013164407313367
  • Lei, S. A. (2010). Instrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Evaluating benefits and drawbacks from college instructors’ perspectives. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37(2), 163–160.
  • Linacre, J. M. (2004). Rasch model estimation: Further topics. Journal of Applied Measurement, 5(1), 95–110.
  • Linacre, J. M. (2014). WINSTEPS (version 3.81.0) [ Computer Software]. Chicago, IL: Winsteps.com.
  • Lundeberg, M. A., Fox, P. W., Brown, A. C., & Elbedour, S. (2000). Cultural influences on confidence: Country and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 152–159. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.152
  • Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V., Gonzales, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international science report: Findings from IEA's trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
  • Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Arora, A., & Preuschoff, C. (2013). Context questionnaire scales in TIMSS and PIRLS 2011. In L. Rutkowski, M. von Davier, & D. Rutkowski (Eds.), A handbook of international large-scale assessment data analysis (pp. 299–316). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Masters, G. N. (1988). Item discrimination: When more is worse. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25(1), 15–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1988.tb00288.x
  • Michael, O. M., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center: Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
  • Miller, R. B., Greene, B. A., Montalvo, G. P., Ravindran, B., & Nichols, J. D. (1996). Engagement in academic work: The role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others, and perceived ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 388–422. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1996.0028
  • Ministry of Education. (2016). Salaries and benefits. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/careers/teach/salary-benefits
  • Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2003). Children's perceptions of school science. School Science Review, 84, 109–116.
  • Nolan, S. B., & Haladyna, T. M. (1990). Motivation and studying in high school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(2), 115–126. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660270204
  • Oon, P. T., & Subramaniam, R. (2011). On the declining interest in physics among students—From the perspective of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 33(5), 727–746. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.500338
  • Oon, P. T., & Subramaniam, R. (2013). Factors influencing Singapore students’ choice of physics as a tertiary field of study: A Rasch analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 35(1), 86–118. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.718098
  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000032199
  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Tytler, R. (2009, August). Attitudes towards school science: An update. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. Retrieved 30 July 2006 from http://webfronter.com/bexley/science/menu3/Attitudes_towards_School_Science_Final_Osborne_2007.doc
  • Papanastasiou, E. C., & Zembylas, M. (2004). Differential effects of science attitudes and science achievement in Australia, Cyprus, and the USA. International Journal of Science Education, 26(3), 259–280. doi: 10.1080/0950069022000038277
  • Park, H., Khan, S., & Petrina, S. (2009). ICT in science education: A quasi-experimental study of achievement, attitudes toward science, and career aspirations of Korean middle school students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(8), 993–1012. doi: 10.1080/09500690701787891
  • Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: A systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85–129. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2014.881626
  • Reckase, M. D. (1979). Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4(3), 207–230. doi: 10.3102/10769986004003207
  • Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2017). Investigating gender differences in mathematics and science: Results from the 2011Trends in mathematics and science survey. Research in Science Education. doi: 10.1007/s11165-017-9630-6
  • Romine, W. L., & Walter, E. M. (2014). Assessing the efficacy of the measure of understanding of macroevolution as a valid tool for undergraduate non-science majors. International Journal of Science Education, 36(17), 2872–2891. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2014.938376
  • Rutkowski, L., Gonzalez, E., Joncas, M., & von Davier, M. (2010). International large-scale assessment data: Issues in secondary analysis and reporting. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 142–151. doi: 10.3102/0013189X10363170
  • Sabah, S., Hammouri, H., & Akour, M. (2013). Validation of scale of attitudes towards science across counters using Rasch model: Findings from TIMSS. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(5), 692–702.
  • Schreiner, C. (2006). Exploring a ROSE garden: Norwegian youth's orientations towards science: seen as signs of late modern identities. PhD thesis submitted to University of Oslo.
  • Schumacker, R. E. (1996). Disattenuating correlation coefficients. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 10(1), 479. Retrieved from https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt101g.htm
  • Simpkins, S. D., Price, C. D., & Garcia, K. (2015). Parental support and high school students’ motivation in biology, chemistry, and physics: Understanding differences among Latino and Caucasian boys and girls. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(10), 1386–1407. doi: 10.1002/tea.21246
  • Sjaastad, J. (2013). Measuring the ways significant persons influence attitudes towards science and mathematics. International Journal of Science Education, 35(2), 192–212. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.672775
  • Smith, R. M. (1996). A comparison of methods for determining dimensionality in Rasch measurement. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 3, 25–40. doi: 10.1080/10705519609540027
  • Soldner, M., Rowan-Kenyon, H., Inkelas, K. K., Garvey, J., & Robbins, C. (2012). Supporting students’ intentions to persist in STEM disciplines: The role of living-learning programs among other social-cognitive factors. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(3), 311–336. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2012.11777246
  • Tan, L. W. H., & Subramaniam, R. (2000). Wiring up the island state. Science, 288(5466), 621–623. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5466.621
  • Tan, W. H. L., & Subramaniam, R. (2003). Science and the student entrepreneur. Science, 67(5598), 219–220.
  • Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire for assessing students’ motivation toward science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 639–654. doi: 10.1080/0950069042000323737
  • Wang, T. L., & Berlin, D. (2010). Construction and validation of an instrument to measure Taiwanese elementary students’ attitudes toward their science class. International Journal of Science Education, 32(18), 2413–2428. doi: 10.1080/09500690903431561
  • Wang, W. C., Chen, H. F., & Jin, K. Y. (2015). Item response theory models for wording effects in mixed-format scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75(1), 157–178. doi: 10.1177/0013164414528209
  • Webster, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (2000). Accounting for variation in science and mathematics achievement: A multilevel analysis of Australian data third international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(3), 339–360. doi: 10.1076/0924-3453(200009)11:3;1-G;FT339
  • Wong, N., Rindfleisch, A., & Burroughs, J. E. (2003). Do reverse-worded items confound measures in cross-cultural consumer research? The case of the material values scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 72–91. doi: 10.1086/374697
  • Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1996). Reasonable mean-square fit values, Part 2. In J. M. Linacre (Ed.), Rasch measurement transactions.
  • Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago: MESA Press.
  • Yang, C. (2016). 5000 teachers leave the service over five years. The Straits Times. Singapore: Singapore Press Holdings.
  • Zain, A. N. M., Samsudin, M. A., Rohandi, R., & Jusoh, A. (2010). Using the Rasch model to measure students’ attitudes toward science in low performing secondary schools in Malaysia. International Education Studies, 3(2), 56–63.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.