Scientific literacy for democratic decision-making

References

• Abdi, A. A., & Carr, P. R. (Eds.). (2013). Educating for democratic consciousness: Counter-hegemonic possibilities. Bern: PeterLang.
   Google Scholar
• Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78, 1102–1134. doi: 10.3102/0034654308326084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acar, O., Turkmen, L., & Roychoudhury, A. (2010). Student difficulties in socio-scientific argumentation and decision-making research findings: Crossing the borders of two research lines. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 1191–1206. doi: 10.1080/09500690902991805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, G. (1986). The content of STS education. STS Research Network Missive, 2(3), 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, G. S. (2003). Review of research on humanistic perspectives in science curricula. Paper presented at the meeting of the European Science Education Research Association, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.usask.ca/education/profiles/aikenhead/webpage/ESERA_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (2006). Educating the ‘right’ way: Markets, standards, God, and inequality (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arons, A. B. (1983). Achieving wider scientific literacy. Daedalus, 112(2), 91–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bataineh, O., & Alazzi, K. F. (2009). Perceptions of Jordanian secondary schools teachers towards critical thinking. International Education, 38(2), 56–72. Retrieved from http://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1162&context=internationaleducation
   Google Scholar
• Bathgate, M., Crowell, A., Schunn, C., Cannady, M., & Dorph, R. (2015). The learning benefits of being willing and able to engage in scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37, 1590–1612. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1045958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87, 352–377. doi: 10.1002/sce.10063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bencze, J. L. (2010). Exposing and deposing hyper-economized school science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(2), 293–303. doi: 10.1007/s11422-010-9256-8
   Google Scholar
• Callan, E. (1997). Creating citizens: Political education and liberal democracy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, P. (2006). Democracy in the classroom? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 10(2), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, P. R. (2011). Does your vote count? In Critical pedagogy and democracy (pp. 1–333). New York, NY: Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, P. R. (2013). Reshaping the democratic truth, and rethinking democracy without elections. In A. A. Abdi & P. R. Carr (Eds.). Educating for democratic consciousness: Counter-hegemonic possibilities (pp. 29–49). Bern: PeterLang.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, P. R., Thomas, P. L., Porfilio, B. J., & Gorlewski, J. (Eds.) (2016). Democracy and decency: What does education have to do with it? Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC). (1997). Common Framework of Science Learning Outcomes: Pan-Canadian Protocol for Collaboration on School Curriculum. Toronto: Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. Retrieved from http://publications.cmec.ca/science/framework/
   Google Scholar
• DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 582–601.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durant, J. R. (1993). What is scientific literacy? In J. R. Durant & J. Gregory (Eds.), Science and culture in Europe (pp. 129–137). London: Science Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Committee on Science Learning, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. F. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 261–295. doi: 10.3102/00028312033002261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18, 4–10. doi: 10.3102/0013189X018003004
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1995). Teaching and Learning: Towards the Learning Society. White paper on Education and Training [COM (95) 590]. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, R. S., & Rennie, L. J. (2009). Promoting understanding of, and teaching about, scientific literacy in primary schools. Teaching Science, 55(2), 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg, J. (1980). Freedom & fulfillment: Philosophical essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gresch, H., Hasselhorn, M., & Bogeholz, S. (2013). Training in decision-making strategies: An approach to enhance students’ competence to deal with socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 2587–2607. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.617789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A. (1993). Democracy and democratic education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 12, 1–9. doi: 10.1007/BF01235468
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Ratcliffe, M. (2005). Socio-scientific issues and the quality of exploratory talk – what can be learned from schools involved in a ‘collapsed day’ project? Curriculum Journal, 16, 439–453. doi: 10.1080/09585170500384396
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670. doi: 10.1080/09500690305021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (2011). Looking to the future: Building a curriculum for social activism. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82, 407–416. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199806)82:3<407::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. (1997). Public life: A contribution to democratic education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29, 431–454. doi: 10.1080/002202797183982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kara, Y. (2012). Pre-service biology teachers’ perceptions on the instruction of socio-scientific issues in the curriculum. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 111–129. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2011.633999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, D. P. (1988). Adolescents’ ability to engage in critical thinking. [S.l.]: Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R. (2012). Nature of science and decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 67–100. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.559490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291–310. doi: 10.1002/sce.1011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16–46. doi: 10.3102/0013189X028002016
   Google Scholar
• Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71–94. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<71::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2014). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science & Education, 23, 285–302. doi: 10.1007/s11191-012-9503-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. C. (2007). Developing decision-making skills for socio-scientific issues. Journal of Biological Education, 41(4), 170–177. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2007.9656093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. C. (2012). Socio-scientific issues in health contexts: Treading a rugged terrain. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 459–483. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.613417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Choi, K. (2006). Koren science teachers’ perceptions of the introduction of socio-scientific issues into the science curriculum. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6, 97–117. doi: 10.1080/14926150609556691
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. C., & Grace, M. (2010). Students’ reasoning processes in making decisions about an authentic, local socio-scientific issue: Bat conversation. Journal of Biological Education, 44, 156–165. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2010.9656216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, B. (2005). Governing education. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, R. (2010). Science education and democratic participation: An uneasy congruence? Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 69–119. doi: 10.1080/03057260903562433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, P. (2005). Capitalists and conquerors: A critical pedagogy against empire. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R. (1996). Towards a science curriculum for public understanding. School Science Review, 77(280), 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Next Generation Science Standards for Today’s Students and Tomorrow’s Workforce (NGSS). (2013). Next Generation Science Standards. Available online at http://www.nextgenscience.org/overview-0#Scientific%20Literacy
   Google Scholar
• Nicoll, B. (1996). Developing minds: Critical thinking in k-3. Paper presented at the California Kindergarten Conference, San Francisco, CA. Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, S. P. (1984). Defining observational competence. Science Education, 68, 129–142. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730680206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224–240. doi: 10.1002/sce.10066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2006). Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy: A Framework for PISA 2006. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). PISA 2015: Draft science framework. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts
   Google Scholar
• Parker, W. C. (2003). Teaching democracy: Unity and diversity in public life. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, J. (2002). The role of science teachers in the drive for scientific literacy. School Science Review, 83(304), 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. W., Elder, L., & Bartell, T. (1997). Teachers of teachers: Examining preparation for critical thinking. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED410276.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, J. E., & Totten, S. (2001). Beliefs of science teachers toward the teaching of science/technological/social issues: Are we addressing national standards? Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 21(5), 376–393. doi: 10.1177/027046760102100507
   Google Scholar
• Pedretti, E. (2005). STSE education: Principles and practices. In S. Alsop, L. Bencze, & E. P. Pedretti (Eds.), Analysing exemplary science teaching: Theoretical lenses and a spectrum of possibilities for practice (pp. 116–126). London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, P. & Galavão, C. (2004). The impact of socio-scientific controversies in Portuguese national science teachers’ conceptions and practices. Research in Science Education, 34, 153–171. doi: 10.1023/B:RISE.0000033760.04656.a1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Črne-Hladnik, H., Hladnik, A., Javornik, B., Košmelj, K., & Peklaj, C. (2012). Is judgment of biotechnological ethical aspects related to high school students’ knowledge? International Journal of Science Education, 34, 1277–1296. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.572264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (Ed.) (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Fowler, S. R. (2006). A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation. Science Education, 90(6), 986–1004. doi: 10.1002/sce.20165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 909–921. doi: 10.1002/tea.20327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schugurensky, D. (2013). Democracy does not fall from the sky. In A. A. Abdi & P. R. Carr (Eds.), Educating for democratic consciousness: Counter-hegemonic possibilities (pp. ix–xii). Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, H. (1980). Critical thinking as an educational ideal. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED187762.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, H. (1988). Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking, and education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. G. (2003). Curriculum and teaching face globalization. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (pp. 35–52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Vieira, R. M., Tenreiro-Vieira, C., & Martino, I. P. (2011). Critical thinking: Conceptual clarification and its importance in science education. Science Education International, 22(1), 43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Witz, K. G. & Lee, H. (2009). Science as an ideal: Teachers’ orientations to science and science education reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41, 409–431. doi: 10.1080/00220270802165640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yacoubian, H. A. (2012). Towards a philosophically and a pedagogically reasonable nature of science curriculum (Doctoral dissertation). University of Alberta, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Yacoubian, H. A. (2015). A framework for guiding future citizens to think critically about nature of science and socioscientific issues. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(3), 248–260. doi: 10.1080/14926156.2015.1051671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, S. F. (2014). Beliefs, values, ethics and moral reasoning in socio-scientific education. Issues in Education Research, 24(3), 299–319.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86, 343–367. doi: 10.1002/sce.10025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar