Taking risks with a growth mindset: long-term influence of an elementary pre-service after school science practicum

References

• Ansberry, K., & Morgan, E. (2010). Picture-perfect science lessons: Using children's books to guide inquiry. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, K. (2007). Elementary science teaching. Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capobianco B., and Dooley, A. (2017, January). Teachers’ positive and practical risk taking when learning to teach science through engineering design. Paper presented at the annual meeting for the association of science teacher education, Des Moines, IA.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, T. (2012). Science talk: Preservice teachers facilitating science learning in diverse afterschool environments. School Science and Mathematics, 112(6), 384–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00147.x
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, T. (2016). Designing and implementing an elementary science after-school field experience. Innovations in Science Teacher Education, 1(2). Retrieved from http://innovations.theaste.org/designing-and-implementing-an-elementary-science-after-school-field-experience/
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, T., Smith, S., & Hallar, B. (2014). Confronting barriers to teaching elementary science: Afterschool science teaching experiences for preservice teachers. Teacher Education & Practice, 27(3), 464–487.
   Google Scholar
• Chiapetta, E., & Adams, A. (2000, May). Towards a conception of teaching science and inquiry – the place of content and process. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the national association for research in science teaching, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Cone, N. (2009). Preservice elementary teachers' self-efficacy beliefs about equitable science teaching: Does service learning make a difference. Journal of Elementary science Education, 21(2), 25–34. doi: 10.1007/BF03173682
   Google Scholar
• Cone, N. (2012). The effects of community-based service learning on preservice teachers’ beliefs about the characteristics of effective science teachers of diverse students. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(8), 889–907. doi: 10.1007/s10972-012-9305-0
   Google Scholar
• Cook, D. & Artino, A. (2016). Motivation to learn: An overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50, 997–1014. doi: 10.1111/medu.13074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox-Petersen, A. M., Spencer, B. H., & Crawford, T. J. (2005). Developing a community of teachers through integrated science and literacy service-learning experiences. Issues in Teacher Education, 14(1), 23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A., & Cullin, M. J. (2004). Supporting prospective teachers’ conceptions of modelling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 379–1401. doi: 10.1080/09500690410001673775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindsets and Math/Science achievement. The Opportunity Equation: Transforming Mathematics and Science Education for Citizenship and the Global Economy, 1–17. Retrieved from www.opportunityequation.org
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. (2009, April). Preservice elementary teachers’ curriculum design and development of pedagogical design capacity for inquiry: An activity-theoretical perspective. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Garden Grove, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., & Holroyd, C. (1999). Primary teachers’ understanding of concepts of science: Impact on confidence and teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 19(1), 93–105. doi: 10.1080/0950069970190107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, K. N., & Trexler, C. J. (2016). Testing predictors of instructional practice in elementary science education: The significant role of accountability. Science Education, 100(2), 266–289. doi: 10.1002/sce.21206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hestness, E., McGinnis, J. R., Riedinger, K., & Marbach-Ad, G. (2011). A study of teacher candidates’ experiences investigating global climate change education within an elementary science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 351–369. doi: 10.1007/s10972-011-9234-3
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, A. W., & Spero, R. B. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 343–356. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, C. C., Renn, O., Rosa, E. A., & Webler, T. (2001). Risk, uncertainty, and rational action. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Judson, E. (2002, April). Promoting and evaluating reformed instruction: Generation effects. Paper presented at the pathways to change conference on transforming math and science education in the K-16 continuum, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Judson, E. (2013). The relationship between time allocated for science in elementary schools and state accountability policies. Science Education, 97(4), 621–636. doi: 10.1002/sce.21058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justi, R. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Modelling, teachers’ views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modelers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369–387. doi: 10.1080/09500690110110142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justi, R., & van Driel, J. (2005). The development of science teachers’ knowledge on models and modelling: Promoting, characterizing, and understanding the process. International Journal of Science Education, 27(5), 549–573. doi: 10.1080/0950069042000323773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. (2000). Rethinking the elementary science methods course: A case for content, pedagogy, and informal science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 755–777. doi: 10.1080/09500690050044080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kind, V. (2009). A conflict in your head: An exploration of trainee science teachers’ subject matter knowledge development and its impact on teacher self-confidence. International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1529–1562. doi: 10.1080/09500690802226062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knaggs, C. M. & Sondergeld, T. A. (2015). Science as a learner and as a teacher: Measuring science self-efficacy of elementary preservice teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 115, 117–128. doi: 10.1111/ssm.12110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, J. (2012). Science stories: Science methods for elementary and middle school teachers. (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, A. E., Callay, M., Dietz, M. E., Kent, K., & Richert, A. E. (2002). Evaluating college science and mathematics instruction: A reform effort that improves teaching skills. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36, 388–393.
   Google Scholar
• Le Fevre, D. (2014). Barriers to implementing pedagogical change: The role of teachers’ perceptions of risk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 56–564. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. H., & Li, M. N. F. (2015). Principal leadership and its link to the development of school teacher culture and teaching effectiveness: A case study of an award-winning teaching team at an elementary school. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 10(4), 115–127. doi: 10.22230/ijepl.2015v10n4a555
   Google Scholar
• MacIsaac, D., & Falconer, K. (2001, July). Using the reform teacher observation protocol (RTOP) as a catalyst for self-reflective change in secondary science teaching. Paper presented at the meeting of the American association of physics teachers, Rochester, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Marco-Bujosa, L. M. and Levy, A. J. (2016). Caught in the balance: An organizational analysis of science teaching in schools with elementary science specialists. Science Education, 100, 983–1008. doi: 10.1002/sce.21239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Blunk, M., Crawford, B., Kelley, B., & Meyer, K. M. (1994). Enacting project-based science: Experiences of four middle grade teachers. Elementary School Journal, 94, 517–538. doi: 10.1086/461781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnough, J. T., & Matkins, J. J. (2010). The role of field experience in elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy and ability to connect research to practice. School Science and Mathematics, 110, 13–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.00003.x
   Google Scholar
• Mindset Works Inc. (2008). Brainology. Retrieved from http://www.brainology.us
   Google Scholar
• Minstrell, J., & van Zee E. (Eds.). (2000). Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Next Generation Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piburn, M., & Sawada, D. (2000). Reformed teaching observation protocol (RTOP). Retrieved from: Arizona State University, Electronic Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers Web site http://www.ecept.net/rtop
   Google Scholar
• Pilitsis, V., & Duncan, R. G. (2012). Changes in belief orientations of preservice teachers and their relation to inquiry activities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 909–936. doi: 10.1007/s10972-012-9303-2
   Google Scholar
• Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Rollett, W. (2000). Motivation and action in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 503–529). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), The handbook of research in teacher education (pp. 102–119). New York, NY: Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Santau, A. O., Maerten-Rivera, J. L., Bovis, S., & Orend, J. (2014). A mile wide or an inch deep? Improving elementary preservice teachers’ science content knowledge within the context of a science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(8), 953–976. doi: 10.1007/s10972-014-9402-3
   Google Scholar
• Sawada, D., Piburn, M. D., Judson, E., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., & Bloom, I. (2002). Measuring reform practices in science and mathematics classrooms: The reformed teaching observation protocol. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 245–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb17883.x
   Google Scholar
• Sawada, D., Piburn, M., Falconer, K., Turley, J., Benford, R., & Bloom, I. (2000). Reformed teaching observation protocol (RTOP) (Tech. Rep No. IN00-1). Tempe: Arizona State University, Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Shumow, L., & Schmidt, J. A. (2013). Enhancing adolescents’ motivation for science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegle, D., & McCoach, B. (2005). Making a difference: Motivating gifted students who are not achieving. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(1), 22–27. doi: 10.1177/004005990503800104
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., Walker, L. J., Halverson, R., & Jita, L. (2001). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 918–940. doi: 10.1002/tea.1039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiele, J. (2016). Grading practices and mindset development: The growth of both (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from the K-State Research Exchange. (2016-07-12T19:30:59Z).
   Google Scholar
• Visser, C. F. (2013). Influencing people’s beliefs about the malleability of personal characteristics through a sequence of four loaded multiple-choice questions. Retrieved from www.progressfocusedapproach.com/uploads/visser2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, C. S. and Kang, N.-H. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers’ beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 936–960. doi: 10.1002/tea.20032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, I. R., Banilower, E. R., McMahon, K. C., & Smith, P. S. (2001). Report of the 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., & Thompson, J. (2006). Transcending simple forms of school science investigation: The impact of preservice instruction on teachers’ understandings of model-based inquiry. American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 783–835. doi: 10.3102/00028312043004783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, J. F., & Stone, E. (1992). The risk construct. In J. F. Yates (Ed.), Risk-taking behaviour (pp. 1–25). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar