Attending to science language demands in multilingual classrooms: a case study

References

• Alkhawaldeh, S. A. (2007). Facilitating conceptual change in ninth grade students’ understanding of human circulatory system concepts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(3), 371–385. doi: 10.1080/02635140701535331
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B. A., & Ryoo, K. (2008). Teaching science as a language: A “content-first” approach to science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 529–553. doi: 10.1002/tea.20255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P. L., & Concannon, J. P. (2016). Students’ perceptions of vocabulary knowledge and learning in a middle school science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 391–408. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1143571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxton, C. A., & Lee, O. (2014). English language learners in science education. In N. G. Lederman & K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (2nd ed., pp. 204–222). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cammarata, L., & Tedick, D. (2012). Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 251–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01330.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derewianka, B. (2014). Supporting students in the move from spoken to written language. In A. Mahboob & L. Barratt (Eds.), Englishes in multilingual contexts (pp. 165–182). Dordrecht, NE: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children's ideas. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. H. (2005). Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education, 89(2), 335–347. doi: 10.1002/sce.20050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frändberg, B., Lincoln, P., & Wallin, A. (2013). Linguistic resources used in Grade 8 students’ submicro level explanations—science items from TIMSS 2007. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2387–2406. doi: 10.1007/s11165-013-9363-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93–116. doi: 10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). The language of science. ( J. J. Webster, Eds.). New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, B. M., Wallace, C. W., & Yang, E.-M. (2004). Using a science writing heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh-grade science: Quantitative and qualitative aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 131–149. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000070252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüttner, J., Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. (2013). The power of beliefs: Lay theories and their influence on the implementation of CLIL programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 267–284. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2013.777385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janzen, J. (2008). Teaching English language learners in the content areas. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1010–1038. doi: 10.3102/0034654308325580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, E. K. S., & Bianchini, J. A. (2013). Relationships among science language, concepts, and processes: A study of English learner in junior high school science classes. In J. A. Bianchini, V. L. Akerson, A. Calabrese Barton, O. Lee, & A. J. Rodriguez (Eds.), Moving the equity agenda forward: Equity research, practice, and policy in science education (pp. 261–282). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J. (2007). Discourse in science classrooms. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 443–469). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kwek, D. (2017). Initial findings: Core research programme: Baseline investigation of science pedagogy. Presentation at the Science Research Sharing Seminar at the Academy of Singapore Teacher. Office of Education Research. National Institute of Education, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O., & Buxton, C. (2013). Integrating science and English proficiency for English language learners. Theory Into Practice, 52, 36–42. doi: 10.1080/07351690.2013.743772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, A. M. Y. (2016). Language across the curriculum & CLIL in English as an additional language (EAL) contexts: Theory and practice. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, A. M. Y., & Lo, Y. Y. (2017). Trans/languaging and the triadic dialogue in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Language and Education, 31(1), 26–45. doi: 10.1080/09500782.2016.1230125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, A. M. Y., & Wu, Y. (2015). ‘May I speak Cantonese?’ – co-constructing a scientific proof in an EFL junior secondary science classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(3), 289–305. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2014.988113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, Y. Y., & Macaro, E. (2015). Getting used to content and language integrated learning: What can classroom interaction reveal? The Language Learning Journal, 43(3), 239–255. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2015.1053281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavhunga, E., & Rollnick, M. (2016). Can the principles of topic specific PCK be applied across science topics? Teaching PCK in a pre-service programme. In N. Papadouris, A. Hadjigeorgiou, & C. P. Constantinou (Eds.), Insights from research in science teaching and learning: Book of selected papers from the ESERA 2013 conference (pp. 56–72). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469–498. doi: 10.1002/tea.1014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, T. (2016). Conceptualizing and investigating teachers’ knowledge for integrating content and language in content-based instruction. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 4(2), 144–167. doi: 10.1075/jicb.4.2.01mor
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240. doi: 10.1002/sce.10066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ó Ceallaigh, T. J., Ní Mhurchú, S., & Ní Chróinín, D. (2017). Balancing content and language in CLIL: The experiences of teachers and learners. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 5(1), 58–86. doi: 10.1075/jicb.5.1.03oce
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelaez, N. J., Boyd, D. D., Rojas, J. B., & Hoover, M. A. (2005). Prevalence of blood circulation misconceptions among prospective elementary teachers. Advances in Physiology Education, 29(3), 172–181. doi: 10.1152/advan.00022.2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raved, L., & Yarden, A. (2014). Developing seventh grade students’ systems thinking skills in the context of the human circulatory system. Frontiers in Public Health, 2, 247. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00260
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saul, W. (Ed.). (2004). Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, National Science Teachers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Schoultz, J., Säljö, R., & Wyndhamn, J. (2001). Conceptual knowledge in talk and text: What does it take to understand a science question? Instructional Science, 29, 213–236. doi: 10.1023/A:1017586614763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seah, L. H. (2013). Interpreting students’ writings: Misconception or misrepresentation. School Science Review, 94(349), 91–97.
   Google Scholar
• Seah, L. H. (2018, July). What does it take for science teachers to attend to the language and literacy demands of their subject domain. In Z. Fang (Chair), Discipline literacies: An SFL perspective. Invited colloquium presented at the meeting of the 45th International Systemic Functional Congress, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Seah, L. H., Clarke, D. J., & Hart, C. (2015). Understanding middle school students’ difficulties in explaining density differences from a language perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 37(14), 2386–2409. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1080879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seah, L. H., & Yore, L. D. (2017). The roles of teachers’ science talk in revealing language demands within diverse elementary school classrooms: A study of teaching heat and temperature in Singapore. International Journal of Science Education, 39(2), 135–157. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1270477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, C., Shanahan, T., & Misischia, C. (2011). Analysis of expert readers in three disciplines: History, mathematics, and chemistry. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 393–429. doi: 10.1177/1086296X11424071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, R. E. (2005). The discourse of linguistic capital: Language and economic policy planning in Singapore. Language Policy, 4(1), 47–66. doi: 10.1007/s10993-004-6564-4
   Google Scholar
• Silver, R. E., & Bokhorst-Heng, W. D. (2016). Overarching themes, bilingual dreams and multilingual landscapes: Quadrilingual education in Singapore. In R. Silver, & W. D. Bokhorst-Heng (Eds.), Quadrilingual education in Singapore (pp. 3–19). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Singapore Department of Statistics. (2015). General household survey 2015. Retrieved from http://www.singstat.gov.sg/publications/publications-and-papers/GHS/ghs2015content
   Google Scholar
• Sungur, S., Tekkaya, C., & Geban, Ö. (2001). The contribution of conceptual change texts accompanied by concept mapping to students’ understanding of the human circulatory system. School Science and Mathematics, 101(2), 91–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18010.x
   Google Scholar
• Tan, M. (2011). Mathematics and science teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding the teaching of language in content learning. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 325–342. doi: 10.1177/1362168811401153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedick, D. J., Christian, D., & Fortune, T. (2011). The future of immersion education: An invitation to ‘dwell in possibility’. In D. J. Tedick, D. Christian, & T. W. Fortune (Eds.), Immersion education: Practices, policies, possibilities (pp. 1–10). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Thörne, K., & Gericke, N. (2014). Teaching genetics in secondary classrooms: A linguistic analysis of teacher talk about proteins. Research in Science Education, 44(1), 81–108. doi: 10.1007/s11165-013-9375-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaish, V., Jamaludeen, A., & Roslan, M. (2009). The sociolinguistic survey of Singapore 2006: Findings and policy implications. Research brief. Singapore: National Institute of Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar