References
- Alexander, R. J. (2001). Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
- British Educational Research Association. (2011). Ethical guidelines for educational research. London: BERA.
- Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. London: SAGE.
- Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1315–1346. doi: 10.1080/09500690600621100
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research 3e: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
- Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (2006). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. London: Routledge Falmer.
- Hennessy, S., Rojas-Drummond, S., Higham, R., María Márquez, A., Maine, F., Ríos, R. M., … Barrera, M. J. (2016). Developing a coding scheme for analysing classroom dialogue across educational contexts. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 9, 16–44. doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.12.001
- Holland, D., Lachicotte Jr, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Holliday, A. (2007). Doing and writing qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.
- Kawalkar, A., & Vijapurkar, J. (2013). Scaffolding science talk: The role of teacher’s questions in the inquiry classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2004–2027. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.604684
- Krussel, L., Edwards, B., & Springer, G. T. (2004). The teacher’s discourse moves: A framework for analyzing discourse in mathematics classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 104(7), 307–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2004.tb18249.x
- Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
- Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (2014). The study of talk between teachers and students, from the 1970s until the 2010s. Oxford Review of Education, 40(4), 430–445. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2014.934087
- Mercer, N., Dawes, L., & Staarman, J. K. (2009). Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom. Language and Education, 23(4), 353–369. doi: 10.1080/09500780902954273
- Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. Oxon: Routledge.
- Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95–111. doi: 10.1080/0141192990250107
- Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C. (2012). Checklist: Goals for productive discussions and nine talk moves. TERC Talk Science Primer. Retrieved from https://inquiryproject.terc.edu/shared/pd/TalkScience_Primer.pdf
- Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C. (2013). Conceptualizing talk moves as tools: Professional development approaches for academically productive discussion. Socializing intelligence through talk and dialogue. Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
- Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
- Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature acheivement. Research in Teaching of Englsih, 25(3), 261–290.
- O’Donoghue, T. (2007). Planning your qualitative research project: An introduction to interpretivist research in education. London: Routledge.
- Rojas-drummond, S., Maine, F., Alarcón, M., Trigo, A. L., Barrera, M. J., Mazón, N., … Hofmann, R. (2017). Dialogic literacy: Talking, reading and writing among primary school children. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 12, 45–62. doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.09.005
- Roth, W. M. (1996). Teacher questioning in an open-inquiry learning environment: Interactions of context, content, and student responses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 709–736. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199609)33:7<709::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-R
- Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2006). Informal formative assessment and scientific inquiry: Exploring teachers’ practices and student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(3 & 4), 205–235. doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1103&4_4.
- Ruthven, K., Mercer, N., Taber, K. S., Guardia, P., Hofmann, R., Ilie, S., … Riga, F. (2017). A research-informed dialogic-teaching approach to early secondary school mathematics and science: The pedagogical design and field trial of the epiSTEMe intervention. Research Papers in Education, 32(1), 18–40. doi:10.1080/02671522.2015.1129642.
- Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605–631. doi:10.1002/sce.20131.
- Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. London: Oxford University Press.
- Teo, P. (2016). Exploring the dialogic space in teaching: A study of teacher talk in the pre-university classroom in Singapore. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 47–60. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.019.
- Tytler, R., & Aranda, G. (2015). Expert teachers’ discursive moves in science classroom interactive talk. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 425–446. doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9617-6.
- Vijaysimha, I. (2013). ‘We are textbook badnekais!’: A bernsteinian analysis of textbook culture in science classrooms. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 10, 67–97. doi: 10.1177/0973184912465161
- Wells, G., & Arauz, R. M. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379–428. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3
- Westgate, D., & Hughes, M. (1997). Identifying “quality” in classroom talk: An enduring research task. Language and Education, 11(2), 125–139. doi: 10.1080/09500789708666723