Content analysis of inquiry-based tasks in high school biology textbooks in Mainland China

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 835–855. doi: 10.1002/tea.20226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1023/A:1015171124982
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction: Assessing the inquiry level of classroom activities. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30–33. Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/store/product_detail.aspx?id=10.2505/4/tst05_072_07_30
   Google Scholar
• Bevins, S., & Price, G. (2016). Reconceptualising inquiry in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 17–29. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1124300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biological Science Curriculum Study, & WestEd. (2002). Analyzing instructional materials (AIM) (Unpublished work).
   Google Scholar
• Bulunuz, M., Jarrett, O. S., & Martin-Hansen, L. (2012). Level of inquiry as motivator in an inquiry methods course for preservice elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 112(6), 330–339. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00153.x
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (2006). Scientific inquiry and science teaching. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (2010). The teaching of science: 21st century perspectives. Arlington, TX: National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175–218. doi: 10.1002/sce.10001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642. doi: 10.1002/tea.20157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. G., Pilitsis, V., & Piegaro, M. (2010). Development of preservice teachers’ ability to critique and adapt inquiry-based instructional materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(1), 81–102. doi: 10.1007/s10972-009-9153-8
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. (2013). Two views about explicitly teaching nature of science. Science & Education, 22(9), 2109–2139. doi: 10.1007/s11191-012-9539-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fay, M. E., Grove, N. P., Towns, M. H., & Bretz, S. L. (2007). A rubric to characterize inquiry in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 212–219. Retrieved from http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2007/RP/B6RP90031C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, M. A., & Byers, A. (2002). A rubric for selecting inquiry-based activities. Science Scope, 26(1), 22–25. Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/store/product_detail.aspx?id=10.2505/4/ss02_026_01_22
   Google Scholar
• Germann, P. J., Haskins, S., & Auls, S. (1996). Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals: Promoting scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(5), 475–499. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199605)33:5<475::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herron, M. D. (1971). The nature of scientific enquiry. The School Review, 79(2), 171–212. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1084259?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, J. S. (2009). Teaching scientific inquiry: exploration, directed, guided, and open-ended levels. In National geographic science: Best practices in science education. Retrieved from http://www.ngspscience.com/profdev/Monographs/SCL22-0439A_SCI_AM_Lederman_lores.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2012). Nature of scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry: Building instructional capacity through professional development. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 338–339). Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B. V.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners’ understandings about scientific inquiry – the views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65–83. doi: 10.1002/tea.21125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, E. (2012). Biology education in China 2000-2010: Curricular trends and teacher preparation models for a changing society. In M. Kim & C. H. Diong (Eds.), Biology education for social and sustainable development (pp. 51–59). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Liang, L. L., & Liu, E. (2012). Science education research in China: Challenges and promises. International Journal of Science Education, 34(13), 1961–1970. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.709330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livermore, A. H. (1964). The process approach of the AAAS commission on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(4), 271–282. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660020403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, C. V. (2016). Evaluating junior secondary science textbook usage in Australian schools. Research in Science Education, 46(4), 481–509. doi: 10.1007/s11165-015-9468-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, R. (2009). Analysing practical activities to assess and improve effectiveness: The practical activity analysis inventory (PAAI). York: Centre for Innovation and Research in Science Education, Department of Educational Studies, University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R. (2010). Practical work. In J. Osborne & J. Dillon (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching: What research has to Say (2nd ed.) (pp. 108–134). New York, NY: Mc Graw Hill/Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education [MOE] of the People’s Republic of China. (2001a). National outline for the primary and secondary curricular reform. Retrieved from http://moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe_309/200412/4672.html. (In Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education [MOE] of the People’s Republic of China. (2001b). National biology curriculum standards for middle school. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education [MOE] of the People’s Republic of China. (2003). National biology curriculum standards for high schools. Beijing: People’s Education Press. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education [MOE] of the People’s Republic of China. (2012). National biology curriculum standards for Middle schools 2011 Edition. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education [MOE] of the People’s Republic of China. (2018). National biology curriculum standards for high schools 2017 Edition. Beijing: People’s Education Press. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction – what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. doi: 10.1002/tea.20347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for k-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Padilla, M. J. (1990). The science process skills. In Research matters – to the science teacher. Retrieved from http://www.narst.org/publications/research/skill.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Pingel, F. (2010). Guidebook on textbook research and textbook revision (2nd revised and updated edition). Pairs: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Roseman, J. E., Kulm, G., & Shuttleworth, S. (2001). Putting textbooks to the test. EisenhowerNational Clearinghouse [ENC] Focus, 8(3), Retrieved from http://www.project2061.org/publications/articles/articles/enc.htm
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J. Schwab & P. F. Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science (pp. 1–103). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S., & Tamir, P. (1973). Research on teaching in the natural sciences. In R. M. W. Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching (pp. 1098–1148). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Tamir, P., & Lunetta, V. N. (1978). An analysis of laboratory inquiries in the BSCS yellow version. The American Biology Teacher, 40(6), 353–357. doi: 10.2307/4446267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamir, P., & Lunetta, V. N. (1981). Inquiry-related tasks in high school science laboratory handbooks. Science Education, 65(5), 477–484. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730650503
   Google Scholar
• Wenning, C. J. (2007). Assessing inquiry skills as a component of scientific literacy. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 4(2), 21–24. Retrieved from http://www2.phy.ilstu.edu/pte/publications/assessing_ScInq.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yang, W., & Liu, E. (2016). Development and validation of an instrument for evaluating inquiry-based tasks in science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 38(18), 2688–2711. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1258499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zion, M., & Sadeh, I. (2007). Curiosity and open inquiry learning. Journal of Biological Education, 41(4), 162–169. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2007.9656092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar