The influences of integrating reading, peer evaluation, and discussion on undergraduate students’ scientific writing

References

• Bangert-Drowns, R., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74, 29–58. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-C., Hand, B., & McDowell, L. (2013). The effects of writing-to-learn activities on elementary students’ conceptual understanding: Learning about force and motion through writing to older peers. Science Education, 97, 745–771. doi: 10.1002/sce.21067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, P., & Hilgers, T. (2000). From corrector to collaborator: The range of instructor roles in writing-based natural and applied science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 3–25. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200001)37:1<3::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2017). Epistemic practices of engineering for education. Science Education, 101, 486–505. doi: 10.1002/sce.21271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Y., Kelly, G. J., & Xiao, L. (2019). The development of Chinese undergraduate students’ competence of scientific writing in the context of advanced organic chemistry experiment course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20, 270–287. doi: 10.1039/C8RP00171E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dianovsky, M. T., & Wink, D. J. (2012). Student learning through journal writing in a general education chemistry course for pre-elementary education majors. Science Education, 96, 543–565. doi: 10.1002/sce.21010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirrigl, F. J., Jr., & Noe, M. (2014). The student writing toolkit: Enhancing undergraduate teaching of scientific writing in the biological sciences. Journal of Biological Education, 48(3), 163–171. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2013.863795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268–291. doi: 10.3102/0091732X07309371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Florence, M. K., & Yore, L. D. (2004). Learning to write like a scientist: Coauthoring as an enculturation task. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 637–668. doi: 10.1002/tea.20015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. J. (2015). Educational implications of choosing “practice” to describe science in the next generation science standards. Science Education, 99, 1041–1048. doi: 10.1002/sce.21188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. J., & Forman, E. A. (2006). Chapter 1: Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts. Review of Research in Education, 30, 1–32. doi: 10.3102/0091732X030001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, B., Hohenshell, L., & Prain, V. (2004). Exploring students’ responses to conceptual questions when engaged with planned writing experiences: A study with year 10 science students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 186–210. doi: 10.1002/tea.10128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2002). Teachers implementing writing-to-learn strategies in junior secondary science: A case study. Science Education, 86, 737–755. doi: 10.1002/sce.10016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckler, W. S. (2014). Research on student learning in science: A Wittgensteinian perspective. In M. Matthews (Ed.), History, philosophy and science teaching: New research perspectives (pp. 1381–1410). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Indrisano, R., & Paratore, J. ( Eds.). (2005). Learning to write and writing to learn: Theory and research in practice. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Crujeiras, B. (2017). Epistemic practices and scientific practices in science education. In K. S. Taber & B. Akpan (Eds.), Science education: An international course companion (pp. 69–80). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J. (2014). Discourse practices in science learning and teaching. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.). Handbook of research on science education ( Vol. II, pp. 321–336). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J. (2016). Methodological considerations for the study of epistemic cognition in practice. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Braten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 393–408). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., & Bazerman, C. (2003). How students argue scientific claims: A rhetorical-semantic analysis. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 28–55. doi: 10.1093/applin/24.1.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., & Chen, C. (1999). The sound of music: Constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 883–915. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199910)36:8<883::AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., & Licona, P. (2018). Epistemic practices and science education. In M. Matthews (Ed.), History, philosophy and science teaching: New research perspectives (pp. 139–165). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., McDonald, S., & Wickman, P. O. (2012). Science learning and epistemology. In K. Tobin, B. Fraser, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 281–291). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Keys, C. W. (1999a). Revitalizing instruction in scientific genres: Connecting knowledge production with writing to learn in science. Science Education, 83, 115–130. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199903)83:2<115::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keys, C. W. (1999b). Language as an indicator of meaning generation: An analysis of middle school students’ written discourse about scientific investigations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(9), 1044–1061. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199911)36:9<1044::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiuhara, S., Graham, S., & Hawken, L. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 136–160. doi: 10.1037/a0013097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, P. D. (1999). Reopening inquiry into cognitive processes in writing-to-learn. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 203–270. doi: 10.1023/A:1021913217147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, I. M., & Kusurkar, R. A. (2017). Science-writing in the blogosphere as a tool to promote autonomous motivation in education. The Internet and Higher Education, 35, 48–62. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumpulainen, K., & Rajala, A. (2017). Dialogic teaching and students’ discursive identity negotiation in the learning of science. Learning and Instruction, 48, 23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Scientific thinking and science literacy: Supporting development in learning in contexts. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner, K. A. Renninger, & I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th Vol. 4, pp. 153–196). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 87–113). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. (1999). Mentoring semogenesis: “Genre-based” literacy pedagogy. In F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes (pp. 123–155). London: Cassell (Open Linguistics Series).
   Google Scholar
• McCrindle, A. R., & Christensen, C. A. (1995). The impact of learning journals on metacognitive and cognitive processes and learning performance. Learning and Instruction, 5, 167–185. doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(95)00010-Z
   Google Scholar
• Mody, C. C. M. (2015). Scientific practice and science education. Science Education, 99, 1026–1032. doi: 10.1002/sce.21190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nerland, M., & Jensen, K. (2012). Epistemic practices and object relations in professional work. Journal of Education and Work, 25, 101–120. doi: 10.1080/13639080.2012.644909
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2014). Scientific practices and inquiry in the science classroom. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.). Handbook of research on science education ( Vol. II, pp. 579–599). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pontecorvo, C., & Girardet, H. (1993). Arguing and reasoning in understanding historical topics. Cognition and Instruction, 11(3&4), 365–395. doi: 10.1080/07370008.1993.9649030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., Greene, J. A., & Bråten, I. (2016). Understanding and promoting thinking about knowledge: Origins, issues, and future directions of research on epistemic cognition. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 457–496. doi: 10.3102/0091732X16669319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford-Brizard, K. B., Cantor, P., & Rose, L. T. (2017). Building the bridge between science and practice: Essential characteristics of a translational framework. Mind, Brain, and Education, 11, 155–165. doi: 10.1111/mbe.12153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–173. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroupe, D. (2015). Describing “science practice” in learning settings. Science Education, 99, 1033–1040. doi: 10.1002/sce.21191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickman, P. O. (2004). The practical epistemologies of the classroom: A study of laboratory work. Science Education, 88, 325–344. doi: 10.1002/sce.10129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study: Research design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yore, L., Bisanz, G., & Hand, B. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689–725. doi: 10.1080/09500690305018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L. (1997). The central role of fallacious thinking in science education. Science Education, 81, 483–496. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199707)81:4<483::AID-SCE7>3.0.CO;2-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. Y., & Zhang, H. D. (2009). Scientific writing: A considerable domain in science education. Primary and Secondary Schooling Aboard, (2), 246–251. (Chinese Journal).
   Google Scholar