Patterns of inquiry-based science instruction and student science achievement in PISA 2015

References

• Aditomo, A., & Klieme, E. (2020). Forms of inquiry-based science instruction and their relations with learning outcomes: Evidence from high and low-performing education systems. International Journal of Science Education. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500693.2020.1716093?journalCode=tsed20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Areepattamannil, S. (2012). Effects of inquiry-based science instruction on science achievement and interest in science: Evidence from Qatar. Journal of Educational Research, 105(2), 134–146. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2010.533717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Areepattamannil, S., Freeman, J., & Klinger, D. (2011). Influence of motivation, self-beliefs, and instructional practices on science achievement of adolescents in Canada. Social Psychology of Education, 14(2), 233–259. doi: 10.1007/s11218-010-9144-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns, D., & Areepattamannil, S. (2017). Exploring the relations of inquiry-based teaching to science achievement and dispositions in 54 countries. Research in Science Education, 49, 1–23. doi: 10.1007/s11165-017-9639-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celeux, G., & Soromenho, G. (1996). An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 13, 195–212. doi: 10.1007/BF01246098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P., & Araújo, L. (2018). Quality of teaching and learning in science (EUR 28865 EN). Publications office of the European Union. Luxembourg. doi:10.2760/860512. JRC109064.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. doi: 10.3102/0034654312457206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, K. A., & Wong, K. K. (2012). A cross national examination of inquiry and its relationship to student performance in science: Evidence from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2006. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 303–318. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2012.04.004
   Google Scholar
• Hallquist, M. N., & Wiley, J. F. (2018). Mplusautomation: An R package for facilitating large-scale latent variable analyses in Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzberger, D., Praetorius, A.-K., Seidel, T., & Kunter, M. (2019). Identifying effective teachers: The relation between teaching profiles and students’ development in achievement and enjoyment. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34, 801–823. doi: 10.1007/s10212-018-00410-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, J., Choi, K. M., Bae, Y., & Shin, D. H. (2018). Do teachers’ instructional practices moderate equity in mathematical and scientific literacy? An investigation of the PISA 2012 and 2015. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(1), 25–45. doi: 10.1007/s10763-018-9909-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, F., & McComas, W. F. (2015). The effects of inquiry teaching on student science achievement and attitudes: Evidence from propensity score analysis of PISA data. International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 554–576. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2014.1000426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, J., & Keinonen, T. (2017). The effect of student-centered approaches on students’ interest and achievement in science: Relevant topic-based, open and guided inquiry-based, and discussion-based approaches. Research in Science Education, 48, 865–885. doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9590-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobarg, M., Prenzel, M., Seidel, T., Walker, M., McCrae, B., Cresswell, J., & Wittwer, J. (2011). An international comparison of science teaching and learning: Further results from PISA 2006. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, K.-C., & Lam, T. Y.-P. (2017). Instructional practices and science performance of 10 top-performing regions in PISA 2015. International Journal of Science Education, 39(15), 2128–2149. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1387947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConney, A., Oliver, M. C., Woods-McConney, A., Schibeci, R., & Maor, D. (2014). Inquiry, engagement, and literacy in science: A retrospective, cross-national analysis using PISA 2006. Science Education, 98(6), 963–980. doi: 10.1002/sce.21135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. doi: 10.1002/tea.20347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, K., Prenzel, M., Seidel, T., Schiepe-Tiska, A., & Kjærnsli, M. (2016). Science teaching and learning in schools: Theoretical and empirical foundations for investigating classroom-level processes. In S. Kuger, E. Klieme, N. Jude, & D. Kaplan (Eds.), Assessing contexts of learning. An international perspective (pp. 423–446). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2019). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, K., Fischer, H., & Kauertz, A. (2010). From PISA to educational standards: The impact of large-scale assessments on science education in Germany. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 545–563. doi: 10.1007/s10763-010-9206-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards. For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oberski, D. (2016). Mixture models: Latent profile and latent class analysis. In Modern statistical methods for HCI (pp. 275–287). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016a). PISA 2015 results (volume I): Excellence and equity in education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016b). PISA 2015 results (volume II): Policies and practices for successful schools. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2017a). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematics, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2017b). PISA 2015 technical report. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2018a). Foreign: Read data stored by ‘Minitab’, ‘S’, ‘SAS’, ‘SPSS’, ‘Stata’, ‘Systat’, ‘Weka’, ‘dBase’. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=foreign
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2018b). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Robitzsch, A., & Oberwimmer, K. (2018). BIFIEsurvey: Tools for survey statistics in educational assessment. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BIFIEsurvey
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, C. M., Scott, T. P., Tolson, H., Huang, T. Y., & Lee, Y. H. (2007). A meta-analysis of national research: Effects of teaching strategies on student achievement in science in the United States. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(10), 1436–1460. doi: 10.1002/tea.20212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settlage, J. (2007). Demythologizing science teacher education: Conquering the false ideal of open inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(4), 461–467. doi: 10.1007/s10972-007-9060-9
   Google Scholar
• Tang, N.-E., Tsai, C.-L., Barrow, L., & Romine, W. (2019). Impacts of enquiry-based science teaching on achievement gap between high-and-low SES students: Findings from PISA 2015. International Journal of Science Education, 41(4), 448–470. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1555726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddington, D., Nentwig, P., & Schanze, S. (2007). Making it comparable. Standards in science education 1664. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, D., & Christman, M. (2014). Clustsig: Significant cluster analysis. R Package version 1.1.2014. Retrieved from https://cran.hafro.is/web/packages/clustsig/clustsig.pdf
   Google Scholar