References
- Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2014). The evolving landscape related to assessment of nature of science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 621–650). Routledge.
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417–436.
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057–1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1057::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-C
- Adbo, K., & Taber, K. S. (2009). Learners’ mental models of the particle nature of matter: A study of 16-year-old Swedish science students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(6), 757–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701799383
- Allchin, D. (2013). Teaching the nature of science: Perspectives & resources. Ships Education Press.
- Allchin, D., Andersen, H. M., & Nielsen, K. (2014). Complementary approaches to teaching nature of science: Integrating student inquiry, historical cases, and contemporary cases in classroom practice. Science Education, 98(3), 461–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21111
- Ambrose, B. S. (1999). Investigation of student understanding of the wave-like properties of light and matter (Doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle.
- Arya, D. J., & Maul, A. (2012). The role of the scientific discovery narrative in middle school science education: An experimental study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1022–1032. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028108
- Azevedo, N. H., & Scarpa, D. L. (2017). A systematic review of studies about conceptions on the nature of science in science education. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 17(2), 621–659. https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2017172621
- Baily, C. R. (2011). Perspectives in quantum physics: Epistemological, ontological and pedagogical (Doctoral dissertation). University of Colorado, Boulder.
- Baily, C., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2010). Refined characterization of student perspectives on quantum physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 6(2), 020113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020113
- Baily, C., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2015). Teaching quantum interpretations: Revisiting the goals and practices of introductory quantum physics courses. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2), 020124. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020124
- Barad, K. (1995). A feminist approach to teaching quantum physics. In S. V. Rossner (Ed.), Teaching the majority: Breaking the gender barrier in science, mathematics, and engineering (pp. 43–75). Teachers College Press.
- Bøe, M. V., Henriksen, E. K., & Angell, C. (2018). Actual versus implied physics students: How students from traditional physics classrooms related to an innovative approach to quantum physics. Science Education, 102(4), 649–667. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21339
- Bohm, D. (1952). A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables. I. Physical Review, 85(2), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.85.166
- Bohr, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 48(8), 696–702. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.48.696
- Brookes, D. T., & Etkina, E. (2007). Using conceptual metaphor and functional grammar to explore how language used in physics affects student learning. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3(1), 010105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010105
- Bunge, M. (2003). Twenty-five centuries of quantum physics: From Pythagoras to us, and from subjectivism to realism. Science & Education, 12(5-6), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025336332476
- Bungum, B., Bøe, M. V., & Henriksen, E. K. (2018). Quantum talk: How small-group discussions may enhance students’ understanding in quantum physics. Science Education, 102(4), 856–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21447
- Clough, M. P. (2017). History and nature of science in science education. In K. S. Taber & B. Akpan (Eds.), Science education (pp. 39–51). Sense Publishers.
- Cofré, H., Núñez, P., Santibáñez, D., Pavez, J. M., Valencia, M., & Vergara, C. (2019). A critical review of students’ and teachers’ understandings of nature of science. Science & Education, 28, 205–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00051-3
- Dagher, Z. R., Brickhouse, N. W., Shipman, H., & Letts, W. J. (2004). How some college students represent their understandings of the nature of scientific theories. International Journal of Science Education, 26(6), 735–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000138806
- Dagher, Z. R., & Erduran, S. (2016). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: Why does it matter? Science & Education, 25(1-2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9800-8
- Davies, B. (1997). Physics like you've never had before. Physics Education, 32(6), 418–421. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/32/6/017
- Dunlop, L., & Veneu, F. (2019). Controversies in science. Science & Education, 28(6), 689–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00048-y
- Dutt, A. (2011). Making the transition from classical to quantum physics. Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 57(4), 33–36.
- Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85(5), 554–567. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1023
- Everett, H. (1957). "Relative state" formulation of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 29(3), 454–462. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.29.454
- Falk, J. (2004). Developing a quantum mechanics concept inventory (Unpublished master's thesis). Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
- Garritz, A. (2013). Teaching the philosophical interpretations of quantum mechanics and quantum chemistry through controversies. Science & Education, 22(7), 1787–1807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9444-x
- Greca, I. M., & Freire, O. (2014). Meeting the challenge: Quantum physics in introductory physics courses. In M. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 183–209). Springer.
- Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K. R. (1992). Grade-12 students’ misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290609
- Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1996). Secondary students’ mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education, 80(5), 509–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199609)80:5<509::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-F
- Henke, A., & Höttecke, D. (2015). Physics teachers’ challenges in using history and philosophy of science in teaching. Science & Education, 24(4), 349–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9737-3
- Hermann, G. (1935). Die naturphilosophischen Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik [Natural-philosophical foundations of quantum mechanics]. Naturwissenschaften, 23(42), 718–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01491142
- Hodson, D., & Wong, S. L. (2014). From the horse's mouth: Why scientists’ views are crucial to nature of science understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2639–2665. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.927936
- Hoehn, J. R., Gifford, J. D., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2019). Investigating the dynamics of ontological reasoning across contexts in quantum physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 010124. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010124
- Hogan, K. (2000). Exploring a process view of students’ knowledge about the nature of science. Science Education, 84(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<51::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-H
- Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549
- Höttecke, D., Henke, A., & Riess, F. (2012). Implementing history and philosophy in science teaching: Strategies, methods, results and experiences from the European HIPST project. Science & Education, 21(9), 1233–1261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9330-3
- Irwin, A. R. (2000). Historical case studies: Teaching the nature of science in context. Science Education, 84(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<5::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-0
- Jenkins, E. W. (2013). The ‘nature of science’ in the school curriculum: The great survivor. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(2), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.741264
- Johansson, A., Andersson, S., Salminen-Karlsson, M., & Elmgren, M. (2018). “Shut up and calculate”: The available discursive positions in quantum physics courses. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(1), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9742-8
- Johnston, I. D., Crawford, K., & Fletcher, P. R. (1998). Student difficulties in learning quantum mechanics. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200404
- Kaur, T., Blair, D., Stannard, W., Treagust, D., Venville, G., Zadnik, M., Mathews, W., & Perks, D. (2018). Determining the intelligibility of Einsteinian concepts with middle school students. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9791-y
- Ke, J., Monk, M., & Duschl, R. (2005). Learning introductory quantum physics: Sensori-motor experiences and mental models. International Journal of Science Education, 27(13), 1571–1594. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500186485
- Khishfe, R. (2014). Explicit nature of science and argumentation instruction in the context of socioscientific issues: An effect on student learning and transfer. International Journal of Science Education, 36(6), 974–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.832004
- Khishfe, R. (2017). Consistency of nature of science views across scientific and socio-scientific contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 39(4), 403–432.
- Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10036
- Kim, S. Y., & Irving, K. E. (2010). History of science as an instructional context: Student learning in genetics and nature of science. Science & Education, 19(2), 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9191-9
- Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, K., Pol, H. J., Brinkman, A., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2017). Insights into teaching quantum mechanics in secondary and lower undergraduate education. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 010109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010109
- Laloë, F. (2001). Do we really understand quantum mechanics? Strange correlations, paradoxes, and theorems. American Journal of Physics, 69(6), 655–701. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1356698
- Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard university press.
- Leach, J., Millar, R., Ryder, J., & Séré, M.-G. (2000). Epistemological understanding in science learning: the consistency of representations across contexts. Learning and Instruction, 10(6), 497–527. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752
- Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034
- Lederman, N. G., & O'Malley, M. (1990). Students' perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74(2), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740207
- Mannila, K., Koponen, I. T., & Niskanen, J. A. (2002). Building a picture of students’ conceptions of wave- and particle-like properties of quantum entities. European Journal of Physics, 23(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/23/1/307
- McComas, W. F. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education (pp. 53–70). Springer.
- McKagan, S. B., Perkins, K. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2008). Why we should teach the Bohr model and how to teach it effectively. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 4(1), 010103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010103
- McKagan, S. B., Perkins, K. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2010). Design and validation of the quantum mechanics conceptual survey. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 6(2), 020121. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020121
- Merali, Z. (2015). Quantum physics: What is really real? Nature, 521(7552), 278–280. https://doi.org/10.1038/521278a
- Mesci, G., & Schwartz, R. S. (2017). Changing preservice science teachers’ views of nature of science: Why some conceptions may be more easily altered than others. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9503-9
- Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D., & Robb, J. (2001). Examining student conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 771–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010016030
- Muller, D. A. (2008). Designing effective multimedia for physics education (Doctoral dissertation). University of Sydney, Sydney.
- Müller, R. (2003). Quantenphysik in der Schule [ Quantum physics in school]. Logos-Verlag.
- Müller, R., & Wiesner, H. (2002a). Include interpretation in introductory quantum mechanics courses. American Journal of Physics, 70(9), 887. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1492808
- Müller, R., & Wiesner, H. (2002b). Teaching quantum mechanics on an introductory level. American Journal of Physics, 70(3), 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1435346
- Niaz, M., & Rodríguez, M. A. (2002). Improving learning by discussing controversies in 20th century physics. Physics Education, 37(1), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/37/1/308
- Nikolić, H. (2008). Would Bohr be born if Bohm were born before Born? American Journal of Physics, 76(2), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2805241
- Petri, J., & Niedderer, H. (1998). A learning pathway in high-school level quantum atomic physics. International Journal of Science Education, 20(9), 1075–1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200905
- Pospiech, G. (2003). Philosophy and quantum mechanics in science teaching. Science & Education, 12(5), 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025384115480
- Ryder, J., Leach, J., & Driver, R. (1999). Undergraduate science students’ images of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199902)36:2<201::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-H
- Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20065
- Shiland, T. W. (1997). Quantum mechanics and conceptual change in high school chemistry textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(5), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199705)34:5<535::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-R
- Stadermann, H. K. E., van den Berg, E., & Goedhart, M. J. (2019). Analysis of secondary school quantum physics curricula of 15 different countries: Different perspectives on a challenging topic. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 010130. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010130
- Taber, K. S. (2005). Learning quanta: Barriers to stimulating transitions in student understanding of orbital ideas. Science Education, 89(1), 94–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20038
- Tsai, C. (2002). Nested epistemologies: Science teachers’ beliefs of teaching, learning and science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110049132
- Tsaparlis, G., & Papaphotis, G. (2009). High-school students’ conceptual difficulties and attempts at conceptual change: The case of basic quantum chemical concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), 895–930. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801891908
- Vokos, S., Shaffer, P. S., Ambrose, B. S., & McDermott, L. C. (2000). Student understanding of the wave nature of matter: Diffraction and interference of particles. American Journal of Physics, 68(7), S42–S51. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19519
- Wang, H. A., & Marsh, D. D. (2002). Science instruction with a humanistic twist: Teachers’ perception and practice in using the history of science in their classrooms. Science & Education, 11(2), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014455918130
- Wuttiprom, S., Sharma, M. D., Johnston, I. D., Chitaree, R., & Soankwan, C. (2009). Development and use of a conceptual survey in introductory quantum physics. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 631–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701747226