References
- Aldahmash, A. H., Alshamrani, S. M., Alshaya, F. S., & Alsarrani, N. A. (2019). Research trends in in-service science teacher professional development from 2012 to 2016. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12211a
- Alexander, J. M., Johnson, K. E., & Kelley, K. (2012). Longitudinal analysis of the relations between opportunities to learn about science and the development of interests related to science. Science Education, 96(5), 763–786. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21018
- Allen, L., & Kelly, B. B. (2015). Transforming the workforce for children birth through age 8: A unifying foundation. National Academies Press.
- Banerjee, P. A., & Lamb, S. (2016). A systematic review of factors linked to poor academic performance of disadvantaged students in science and maths in schools. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1178441
- Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Malzahn, K. A., Plumley, C. L., Gordon, E. M., & Hayes, M. L. (2018). Report of the 2018 NSSME+. Horizon Research, Inc.
- Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- Beaman, L., Duflo, E., Pande, R., & Topalova, P. (2012). Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: A policy experiment in India. Science, 335(6068), 582–586. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1212382
- Bennett, J. M., Hanley, P. M., Abrahams, I. Z., Turkenburg, M. G. W., & Elliott, L. (2019). Mixed methods, mixed outcomes? Combining an RCT and case studies to research the impact of a training programme for primary school science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 41(4), 490–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1563729
- Curran, F. C., & Kellogg, A. T. (2016). Understanding science achievement gaps by race/ethnicity and gender in kindergarten and first grade. Educational Researcher, 45(5), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16656611
- European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2012). Developing key competences at school in Europe: Challenges and opportunities for policy – 2011/12. Eurydice report. Publications Office of the European Union.
- Forman, E. A., & Cazden, C. B. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 323–347). Cambridge University Press.
- French, L. (2004). Science as the center of a coherent, integrated early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.01.004
- French, L. A. (1988). The development of children’s understanding of “because” and “so”. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 45(2), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(88)90032-X
- Fulp, S. L. (2002). The 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education: Status of elementary school science teaching. Horizon Research, Inc.
- Gottfried, M. A., & Bozick, R. (2016). Supporting the STEM pipeline: Linking applied STEM course-taking in high school to declaring a STEM major in college. Education Finance and Policy, 11(2), 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00185
- Grund, S., Lüdtke, O., & Robitzsch, A. (2016). Multiple imputation of multilevel missing data: An introduction to the R package pan. Sage Open, 6(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016668220
- Grund, S., Robitzsch, A., & Luedtke, O. (2018). mitml: Tools for multiple imputation in multilevel modelling. R package version 0.3-6. Retrieved January 19, 2019, from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mitml/index.html
- Hanson, S. L., Sykes, M., & Pena, L. B. (2018). Gender equity in science: The global context. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 6(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v6i1.2704
- Harvard Family Research Project. (2008). What is complementary learning? Retrieved April 10, 2009, from www.hrfp.org
- Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of 800+ meta-analyses on achievement. Routledge.
- Institute of Education Sciences. (2013). Common guidelines for education research and development. https://ies.ed.gov/pdf/CommonGuidelines.pdf
- Januszyk, R., Miller, E. C., & Lee, O. (2016). Addressing student diversity and equity. Science Scope, 39(8), 16. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/ss16_039_08_16
- Kelly, A. (Ed.). (1981). The missing half: Girls and science education. Manchester University Press.
- Kinzie, M. B., Whittaker, J. V., McGuire, P., Lee, Y., & Kilday, C. R. (2015). Research on curricular development for pre-kindergarten mathematics and science. Teachers College Record, 117(7), 1–40.
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
- Ma, X., Shen, J., Krenn, H. Y., Hu, S., & Yuan, J. (2016). A meta-analysis of the relationship between learning outcomes and parental involvement during early childhood education and early elementary education. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 771–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9351-1
- Maltese, A., & Tai, R. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 669–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902792385
- Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among US students. Science Education, 95(5), 877–907. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20441
- Michaels, S., Shouse, A., & Schweinburger, H. (2007). Ready, set, science!: Putting research to work in k-8 science classrooms. National Academies Press.
- Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Hillemeier, M. M., & Maczuga, S. (2016). Science achievement gaps begin very early, persist, and are largely explained by modifiable factors. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16633182
- National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. The National Academies Press.
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
- National Science Education Standards. (1996). An overview. The National Academies Press.
- Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press. www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards
- Ohio Achievement Assessment. (2015). Test specifications: Grade 5 science. Retrieved January 19, 2019, from https://oh.portal.airast.org/core/fileparse.php/3094/urlt/Test_Specifications_G5_Science.pdf
- Paprzycki, P., Tuttle, N., Czerniak, C. M., Molitor, S., Kaderavek, J., & Mendenhall, R. (2017). The impact of a Framework-aligned science professional development program on literacy and mathematics achievement of K-3 students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(9), 1174–1196. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21400
- Patrick, H., Mantzicopoulos, P., Samarapungavan, A., & French, B. F. (2008). Patterns of young children’s motivation for science and teacher-child relationships. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(2), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.76.2.121-144
- Pearson, P. D., Moje, E., & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science, 328(5977), 459–463. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182595
- Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Haugan Cheng, B., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11421826
- Powell, A., Nielsen, N., Butler, M., Buxton, C., Johnson, O., Ketterlin-Geller, L., Stiles, J., & McCulloch, C. (2018). The use of theory in research on broadening participation in PreK–12 STEM education: Information and guidance for prospective DRK–12 grantees. Education Development Center, Inc. https://cadrek12.org/resources/use-theory-research-broadening-participation-prek–12-stem-education-information-and
- Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, R., & Du Toit, M. (2011). HLM 7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modelling. [Computer software]. Scientific Software International.
- R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
- Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2015). Sex differences in mathematics and science achievement: A meta-analysis of national assessment of educational progress assessments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 645. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000012
- Renaissance Learning. (2013). The research foundation for STAR Assessments: The science of STAR. Retrieved January 19, 2019, from http://doc.renlearn.com/KMNet/R001480701GCFBB9.pdf
- Rock, D. A., & Pollack, J. M. (2002). Early childhood longitudinal study-kindergarten class of 1998-99 (ECLS-K): Psychometric report for kindergarten through first grade (Working Paper Series). https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/200205.pdf
- Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language (pp. 679–744). Wiley.
- Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (1992). A curriculum strategy that expands time for in-depth elementary science instruction by using science-based reading strategies: Effects of a year-long study in grade four. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290604
- Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (2001). Evolution of a model for teaching in-depth science in elementary schools: Longitudinal findings and research implications. International Journal of Science Education, 23(4), 373–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690116738
- Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (2011). A research-based instructional model for integrating meaningful learning in elementary science and reading comprehension: Implications for policy and practice. In N. L. Stein & S. W. Raudenbush (Eds.), Developmental cognitive science goes to school (pp. 127–142). Routledge.
- Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (2012). Expanding the role of K-5 science instruction in educational reform: Implications of an interdisciplinary model for integrating science and reading. School Science and Mathematics, 112(8), 506–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12000
- Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (2017). Implications of a cognitive science model integrating literacy in science on achievement in science and reading: Direct effects in grades 3–5 with transfer to grades 6–7. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(6), 979–995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9721-2
- Rosebery, A., Warren, B., Ballenger, C., & Ogonowski, M. (2005). The generative potential of students’ everyday knowledge in learning science. In T. Romberg, T. Carpenter, & F. Dremock (Eds.), Understanding mathematics and science matters (pp. 55–80). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Saçkes, M., Trundle, K. C., Bell, R. L., & O’Connell, A. A. (2011). The influence of early science experience in kindergarten on children’s immediate and later science achievement: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20395
- Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. http://www.fisica.unina.it/traces/attachments/article/149/NuffieldFoundation-Osborne-Dillon-Science-Education-in-Europe.pdf
- Tai, R. H., Liu, C., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312(5777), 1143–1144. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128690
- Tang, N. E., Tsai, C. L., Barrow, L., & Romine, W. (2018). Impacts of enquiry-based science teaching on achievement gap between high-and-low SES students: Findings from PISA 2015. International Journal of Science Education, 1–23.
- Tekkumru-Kisa, M., Stein, M. K., & Coker, R. (2018). Teachers’ learning to facilitate high-level student thinking: Impact of a video-based professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(4), 479–502. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21427
- Traphagen, K., Davis, J., Farbman, D., & Kaplan, C. (2011). Strengthening science education: The power of more time to deepen inquiry and engagement. National Center on Time and Learning. Retrieved January 18, 2019, from http://www.timeandlearning.org/sites/default/files/resources/strengthening_science_education_full_report_.pdf
- Tuttle, N., Kaderavek, J. N., Molitor, S., Czerniak, C. M., Johnson-Whitt, E., Bloomquist, D., Namatovu, W., & Wilson, G. (2016). Investigating the impact of NGSS-aligned professional development on PreK-3 teachers’ science content knowledge and pedagogy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(7), 717–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9484-1
- Tuttle, N., Mentzer, G. A., Strickler, B. D., Hapgood, S., Molitor, S., Kaderavek, J., & Czerniak, C. M. (2017). Exploring how families do science together: Adult-child interactions at community science events. School Science and Mathematics, 117(5), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12221
- Tzou, C., & Bell, P. (2010). Micros and me: Leveraging home and community practices in formal science instruction. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Learning in the disciplines: Proceedings of the 9th international conference of the learning sciences, volume 1 (pp. 127–134). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
- U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. (2020, January). What works clearinghouse: Procedures and standards handbook (Version 4.1). https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks
- Varelas, M., & Pappas, C. C. (2006). Intertextuality in read-alouds of integrated science-literacy units in primary classrooms: Opportunities for the development of thought and language. Cognition and Instruction, 24(2), 211–259. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2402_2
- Varelas, M., Pappas, C. C., & Rife, A. (2006). Exploring the role of intertextuality in concept construction: Urban second graders make sense of evaporation, boiling and condensation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 637–666. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20100
- Varelas, M., Pieper, L., Arsenault, A., Pappas, C. C., & Keblawe-Shamah, N. (2014). How science texts and hands-on explorations facilitate meaning making: Learning from Latina/o third graders. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(10), 1246–1274. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21173
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
- Wang, X. (2015). Pathway to a baccalaureate in STEM fields: Are community colleges a viable route and does early STEM momentum matter? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(3), 376–393. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373714552561
- Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Harvard University Press.
- Worth, K. (2010, May). Science in early childhood classrooms: Content and process. Early childhood research and practice, collected papers from the SEED (STEM in early education and development) conference (Vol. 10, pp. 1–118).
- Yang, Y., Liu, X., & Gardella Jr., J. A. (2018). Effects of professional development on teacher pedagogical content knowledge, inquiry teaching practices, and student understanding of interdisciplinary science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(4), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1439262
- Zhao, J. H., & Schafer, J. L. (2018). Package ‘pan’: Multiple imputation for multivariate panel or clustered data. R package version 1.6. Retrieved January 19, 2019, from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pan/pan.pdf