References
- Aikenhead, G. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. Teachers College Press.
- Albe, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9040-2
- Berland, L. K., & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 68–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20446
- Bingle, W. H., & Gaskell, P. J. (1994). Scientific literacy for decisionmaking and the social construction of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 78(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730780206
- Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.587722
- Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage.
- Ekborg, M., Ottander, C., Silfver, E., & Simon, S. (2013). Teachers’ experience of working with socio-scientific: A large scale and in depth study. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 599–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9279-5
- Friedrichsen, P., Li, K., Sadler, T. D., & Zangori, L. (in press). Enacting co-designed socio-scientific issues-based curriculum units: A case of secondary science teacher learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education.
- Furberg, A., & Ludvigsen, S. (2008). Students’ meaning-making of socio-scientific issues in computer mediated settings: Exploring learning through interaction trajectories. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1775–1799. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701543617
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
- Gouvea, J., & Passmore, C. (2017). “Models of” versus “models for.”. Science & Education, 26(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9884-4
- Grossman, P. L., Smagorinsky, P., & Valencia, S. (1999). Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning to teach. American Journal of Education, 108(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1086/444230
- Hancock, T. S., Friedrichsen, P. J., Kinslow, A. T., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). Selecting socio-scientific issues for teaching. Science & Education, 28(6), 639–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00065-x
- Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
- Hogan, K. (2002). Small groups’ ecological reasoning while making an environmental management decision. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 341–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10025
- Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodríguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). “Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757–792. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<757::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F
- Kelly, G. J., & Cunningham, C. M. (2019). Epistemic tools in engineering design for K-12 education. Science Education, 103(4), 1080–1111. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21513
- Ko, M.-L. M., & Krist, C. (2019). Opening up curricula to redistribute epistemic agency: A framework for supporting science teaching. Science Education, 103(4), 979–1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21511
- Krist, C., Schwarz, C. V., & Reiser, B. J. (2019). Identifying essential epistemic heuristics for guiding mechanistic reasoning in science learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(2), 160–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1510404
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
- Lazarowitz, R., & Bloch, I. (2005). Awareness of societal issues among high school biology teachers teachingg. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(5), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-0220-4
- Lee, H., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Choi, K. (2006). Korean science teachers’ perceptions of the introduction of socio-scientific issues into the science curriculum. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6(2), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150609556691
- Lee, H., & Yang, J. (2019). Science teachers taking their first steps toward teaching Socioscientific issues through collaborative action research. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9614-6
- Leont'ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of mind. Progress Publishers.
- Liu, S.-Y., Lin, C.-S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2011). College students’ scientific epistemological views and thinking patterns in socioscientific decision making. Science Education, 95(3), 497–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20422
- Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2014). Epistemic fluency and professional education. Springer.
- McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Synergy between teacher practices and curricular scaffolds to support students in using domain-specific and domain-general knowledge in writing arguments to explain phenomena. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(3), 416–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903013488
- Mehan, H. (1991). The schools’ work of sorting students. In D. Zimmerman & D. Boden (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 71–90). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
- Newman, E. P., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for Cognitive change in school. Cambridge University Press.
- Nicolaou, C. T., Evagorou, M., & Lymbouridou, C. (2015). Elementary school students’ emotions when exploring an authentic socio-scientific issue through the use of models. Science Education International, 26(2), 240–259.
- Oscarsson, M., Jidesjö, A., Strömdahl, H., & Karlsson, K.-G. (2009). Science in society or science in school: Swedish secondary school science teachers’ beliefs about science and science lessons in comparison with what their students want to learn. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 5(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.280
- Ottander, C., & Ekborg, M. (2012). Students’ experience of working with socioscientific issues—A quantitative study in secondary school. Research in Science Education, 42(6), 1147–1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9238-1
- Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage.
- Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship. Open University Press.
- Russ, R. S., & Luna, M. J. (2013). Inferring teacher epistemological framing from local patterns in teacher noticing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 284–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21063
- Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839
- Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
- Sadler, T. D., Friedrichsen, P., & Zangori, L. (2019). A framework for teaching for socio-scientific issue and model based learning (SIMBL). Educação e Fronteiras/Education and Borders, 9(25), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.30612/eduf.v9i25.11006
- Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345–372. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10130
- Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311
- Stenseth, T., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2016). Investigating interest and knowledge as predictors of students’ attitudes towards socio-scientific issues. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.005
- Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science-as-practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21112
- Tal, T., & Kedmi, Y. (2006). Teaching socioscientific issues: Classroom culture and students’ performances. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(4), 615–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-006-9026-9
- Tan, E., Barton, A. C., & Benavides, A. (2019). Engineering for sustainable communities: Epistemic tools in support of equitable and consequential middle school engineering. Science Education, 103(4), 1011–1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21515
- Tidemand, S., & Nielsen, J. A. (2017). The role of socioscientific issues in biology teaching: From the perspective of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1264644
- Tomas, L., Rigano, D., & Ritchie, S. M. (2016). Students’ regulation of their emotions in a science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(2), 234–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21304
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
- Wendell, K. B., Andrews, C. J., & Paugh, P. (2019). Supporting knowledge construction in elementary engineering design. Science Education, 103(4), 952–978. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21518
- Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard University Press.
- Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Harvard University Press.
- Yang, F.-Y. (2005). Student views concerning evidence and the expert in reasoning a socio-scientific issue and personal epistemology. Educational Studies, 31(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569042000310976
- Zangori, L., Peel, A., Kinslow, A., Friedrichsen, P., & Sadler, T. D. (2017). Student development of model-based reasoning about carbon cycling and climate change in a socio-scientific issues unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(10), 1249–1273. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21404
- Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific Issues as a Curriculum Emphasis: Theory, Research, and Practice. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267-45
- Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048