References
- Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
- Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–1097. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204153
- Ainsworth, S., & Th Loizou, A. (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27(4), 669–681. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2704_5
- Becker, N., Rasmussen, C., Sweeney, G., Wawro, M., Towns, M., & Cole, R. (2013). Reasoning using particulate nature of matter: An example of a sociochemical norm in a university-level physical chemistry class. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP20085F
- Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088307313177
- Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011). Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education, 95(4), 639–669. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20449
- Brooks, M. (2009). Drawing, visualisation and young children’s exploration of ‘big ideas’. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802595771
- Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. London, UK: Harvard University Press.
- Chang, N. (2012). The role of drawing in young children’s construction of science concepts. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40(3), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0511-3
- Chang, J., & Song, J. (2015). A case study on the features of classroom norms formed in inquiry activities of elementary science classes. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(2), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.2.0303
- Chang, J., & Song, J. (2016). A case study on the formation and sharing process of science classroom norms. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 747–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1163435
- Denzin, N. K. (2002). Interpretive interactionism (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
- Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371
- Erickson, F. (1992). Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction. In M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 201–225). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
- Horne, C. (2001). Sociological perspectives on the emergence of social norms. In M. Hechter & K. D. Opp (Eds.), Social norms (pp. 1–34). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
- Jewitt, C., Kress, G., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Exploring learning through visual, actional and linguistic communication: The multimodal environment of a science classroom. Educational Review, 53(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910123753
- Knain, E. (2006). Achieving science literacy through transformation of multimodal textual resources. Science Education, 90(4), 656–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20142
- Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. New York: Continuum.
- Lundqvist, E., Almqvist, J., & Östman, L. (2009). Epistemological norms and companion meanings in science classroom communication. Science Education, 93(5), 859–874. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20334
- Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8(4), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01463939
- McCain, K. (2015). Explanation and the nature of scientific knowledge. Science & Education, 24(7–8), 827–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9775-5
- Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Na, J., & Song, J. (2014). Why everyday experience? Interpreting primary students’. Science discourse from the perspective of John Dewey. Science & Education, 23(5), 1031–1049.
- Newberry, M., & Gilbert, J. K. (2007). Bringing learners and scientific expertise together. In K. S. Taber (Ed.), Science education for gifted learners (pp. 197–211). New York: Routledge.
- Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 1–8). London, UK: Harvard University Press. (C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. W. Burks (Eds.), Vols. 1–6: A. W. Burks (Ed.), Vols. 7–8.)
- Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2013). Representing and learning in science. In R. Tytler, V. Prain, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing representations to learn in science (pp. 1–14). Boston: Sense.
- Quillin, K., & Thomas, S. (2015). Drawing-to-learn: A framework for using drawings to promote model-based reasoning in biology. Life Sciences Education, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0128
- Sandoval, W. A. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students’ scientific explanations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1201_2
- Sözen, M., & Bolat, M. (2011). Determining the misconceptions of primary school students related to sound transmission through drawing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1060–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.239
- Stieff, M. (2017). Drawing for promoting learning and engagement with dynamic visualizations. In R. Lowe & R. Ploetzner (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualization (pp. 333–356). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Tang, K.-S., Delgado, C., & Moje, E. B. (2014). An integrative framework for the analysis of multiple and multimodal representations for meaning-making in science education. Science Education, 98(2), 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21099
- Tytler, R., Hubber, P., Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2013). A representation construction approach. In R. Tytler, V. Prain, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing representations to learn in science (pp. 31–50). Boston: Sense.
- Van Meter, P., Aleksic, M., Schwartz, A., & Garner, J. (2006). Learner-generated drawing as a strategy for learning from content area text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(2), 142–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.04.001
- Van Meter, P., & Garner, J. (2005). The promise and practice of learner-generated drawing: Literature review and synthesis. Educational Psychology Review, 17(4), 285–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-8136-3
- Won, M., Yoon, H., & Treagust, D. F. (2014). Students’ learning strategies with multiple representations: Explanations of the human breathing mechanism. Science Education, 98(5), 840–866. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21128
- Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/749877
- Yackel, E., Rasmussen, C., & King, K. (2000). Social and sociomathematical norms in an advanced undergraduate mathematics course. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(3), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(00)00051-1
- Yeo, J., & Gilbert, J. K. (2014). Constructing a scientific explanation – a narrative account. International Journal of Science Education, 36(11), 1902–1935. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.880527