References
- Ainscough, L., Foulis, E., Colthorpe, K., Zimbardi, K., Robertson-Dean, M., Chunduri, P., & Lluka, L. (2016). Changes in biology self-efficacy during a first-year university course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(2). Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-04-0092
- Australian Academy of Science. (2019). Women in STEM Decadal Plan.
- Ballen, C. J., Danielsen, M., Jørgensen, C., Grytnes, J.-A., & Cotner, S. (2017). Norway's gender gap: Classroom participation in undergraduate introductory science. Nordic Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 262–270. https://doi.org/10.5324/njsteme.v1i1.2325
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
- Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
- Chemers, M. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Syed, M., Goza, B. K., & Bearman, S. (2011). The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 469–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01710.x
- Cheryan, S., & Plaut, V. C. (2010). Explaining underrepresentation: A theory of precluded interest. Sex Roles, 63(7–8), 475–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9835-x
- Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2016). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052
- Cotner, S., Ballen, C., Brooks, D. C., & Moore, R. (2011). Instructor gender and student confidence in the sciences: A need for more role models? Journal of College Science Teaching, 40, 5. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/42993884
- Cotner, S., Thompson, S., & Wright, R. (2017). Do biology majors really differ from non-STEM majors? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(3), article 48. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-11-0329
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Pearson Australia.
- Dennehy, T. C., & Dasgupta, N. (2017). Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(23), 5964–5969. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613117114
- DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Eddy, S. L., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020106
- Eddy, S. L., Brownell, S. E., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Gender gaps in achievement and participation in multiple introductory biology classrooms. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 478–492. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-10-0204
- Findley-Van Nostrand, D., & Pollenz, R. S. (2017). Evaluating psychosocial mechanisms underlying STEM persistence in undergraduates: Evidence of impact from a six-day pre–college engagement STEM academy program. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(2). Article 36. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-10-0294
- Fisher, C. F., Thompson, C. D., & Brookes, R. H. (2020). Gender differences in the Australian undergraduate STEM student experience: A systematic review. Higher Education Research & Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1721441
- Flanagan, K. M., & Einarson, J. (2017). Gender, math confidence, and grit: Relationships with quantitative skills and performance in an undergraduate biology course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(3). Article 47. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-08-0253
- Freedman, G., Green, M. C., Flanagan, M., Fitzgerald, K., & Kaufman, G. (2018). The effect of gender on attributions for women’s anxiety and doubt in a science narrative. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(2), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318754528
- Ganley, C. M., George, C. E., Cimpian, J. R., & Makowski, M. B. (2018). Gender equity in college majors: Looking beyond the STEM/Non-STEM dichotomy for answers regarding female participation. American Educational Research Journal, 55(3), 453–487. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217740221
- Geary, D. C. (1996). Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19(2), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00042400
- Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026659
- Greenwald, A. G., & Krieger, L. H. (2006). Implicit bias: Scientific foundations. California Law Review, 94(4), 945–967. https://doi.org/10.2307/20439056
- Grunspan, D. Z., Eddy, S. L., Brownell, S. E., Wiggins, B. L., Crowe, A. J., & Goodreau, S. M. (2016). Males under-estimate academic performance of their female peers in undergraduate biology classrooms. PLOS ONE, 11(2). Article 0148405. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148405
- Handley, I. M., Brown, E. R., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Smith, J. L. (2015). Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(43), 13201–13206. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510649112
- Hazari, Z., Sadler, P. M., & Sonnert, G. (2013). The science identity of college students: Exploring the intersection of gender, race, and ethnicity. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 82–91. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/43631586
- Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M.-C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20363
- Holman, L., Stuart-Fox, D., & Hauser, C. E. (2018). The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? PLOS Biology, 16(4). Article 2004956. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004956
- Kimura, D. (2000). Sex and Cognition. MIT Press.
- Leaper, C., & Starr, C. R. (2019). Helping and hindering undergraduate women's STEM motivation: Experiences with STEM encouragement, STEM-related gender bias, and sexual harassment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318806302
- Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
- London, B., Rosenthal, L., Levy, S. R., & Lobel, M. (2011). The influences of perceived identity compatibility and social support on women in nontraditional fields during the college transition. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33(4), 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2011.614166
- Luckenbill-Edds, L. (2002). The educational pipeline for women in biology: No longer leaking? BioScience, 52(6), 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0513:tepfwi]2.0.co;2
- Office of the Chief Scientist. (2016). Women in STEM: A story of attrition. Australian Government.
- Perez, T., Cromley, J. C., & Kaplan, A. (2014). The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034027
- Pietri, E. S., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Guha, D., Roussos, G., Brescoll, V. L., & Handelsman, J. (2017). Using video to increase gender bias literacy toward women in science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316674721
- Robnett, R. D. (2016). Gender bias in STEM fields: Variation in prevalence and links to STEM self-concept. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315596162
- Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
- Rosson, M. B., Carroll, J. M., & Sinha, H. (2011). Orientation of undergraduates toward careers in the computer and information sciences. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 11(3), 14. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037276.2037278
- Sax, L. J. (1994). Mathematical self-concept: How college reinforces the gender gap. Research in Higher Education, 35(2), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.2307/40196084
- Sax, L. J., & Newhouse, K. N. S. (2018). Disciplinary field specificity and variation in the STEM gender gap. New Directions for Institutional Research, 179, 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.20275
- Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Westview Press.
- Skinner, E., Saxton, E., Currie, C., & Shusterman, G. (2017). A motivational account of the undergraduate experience in science: Brief measures of students’ self-system appraisals, engagement in coursework, and identity as a scientist. International Journal of Science Education, 39(17), 2433–2459. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1387946
- Spelke, E. S. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science? A critical review. American Psychologist, 60(9), 950–958. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.9.950
- Stake, J. E., & Mares, K. R. (2001). Science enrichment programs for gifted high school girls and boys: Predictors of program impact on science confidence and motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(10), 1065–1088. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10001
- Sullivan, G. M., & Artino Jr, A. R. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541–542. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-5-4-18
- Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
- Trujillo, G., & Tanner, K. D. (2014). Considering the role of affect in learning: Monitoring students’ self-efficacy, sense of belonging, and science identity. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-12-0241
- Wachsmuth, L. P., Runyon, C. R., Drake, J. M., & Dolan, E. L. (2017). Do biology students really hate math? Empirical insights into undergraduate life science majors’ emotions about mathematics. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(3). Article 49. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-08-0248
- Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
- Williams, M. M., & George-Jackson, C. E. (2014). Using and doing science: Gender, self-efficacy, and science identity of undergraduate students in STEM. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(2), 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014004477
- Young, D. M., Rudman, L. A., Buettner, H. M., & McLean, M. C. (2013). The influence of female role models on women’s implicit science cognitions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(3), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313482109