References
- Alberts, B. (2009). Making a science of education. Science, 323(5910), 15. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1169941
- Bamberger, Y., & Davis, E. (2013). Middle-school science students’ scientific modelling performances across content areas and within a learning progression. International Journal of Science Education, 35(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.624133
- Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011). Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education, 95(4), 639–669. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20449
- Brewer, C. A., & Smith, D. (Eds.). (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action. American Association for the Advancement of Science.
- Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2000a). Learning deeply in science: An analysis and reintegration of deep approaches in two case studies of grade 8 students. Research in Science Education, 30(2), 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461627
- Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 109–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200002)37:2<109::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-7
- Coll, R. K., & Lajium, D. (2011). Modeling and the future of science learning. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), Models and modeling: Cognitive tools for scientific enquiry (pp. 3–19). Springer.
- Constantinou, C. P., Nicolaou, C. T., & Papaevripidou, M. (2019). A framework for modeling-based learning, teaching, and assessment. In Belzen Annette Upmeier zu, Krüger Dirk, & Driel Jan van (Eds.), Towards a competence-based view on models and modeling in science education (pp. 39–58). Springer.
- Crawford, B. A., & Cullin, M. J. (2004). Supporting prospective teachers’ conceptions of modelling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1379–1401. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690410001673775
- Dauer, J. T., & Long, T. M. (2015). Long-term conceptual retrieval by college biology majors following model-based instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(8), 1188–1206. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21258
- Dauer, J. T., Momsen, J. L., Speth, E. B., Makohon-Moore, S. C., & Long, T. M. (2013). Analyzing change in students’ gene-to-evolution models in college-level introductory biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(6), 639–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21094
- Davidson, J. E., Deuser, R., & Sternberg, R. J. (1996). The role of metacognition in problem solving. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 207–226). MIT Press.
- diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2–3), 105–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
- Diseth, Å, & Martinsen, Ø. (2003). Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410303225
- Duncan, R. G. (2007). The role of domain-specific knowledge in generative reasoning about complicated multileveled phenomena. Cognition and Instruction, 25(4), 271–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701632355
- Elby, A. (2019). Did the framework for K-12 science education trample itself? A reply to ‘addressing the epistemic elephant in the room: Epistemic agency and the next generation science standards’. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(4), 518–520. doi.10.1002/tea.21539
- Gouvea, J., & Passmore, C. (2017). Models of ‘versus’ models for. Science & Education, 26(1-2), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9884-4
- Guy-Gaytán, C., Gouvea, J. S., Griesemer, C., & Passmore, C. (2019). Tensions between learning models and engaging in modeling. Science & Education, 28(8), 843–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00064-y
- Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S. (1998). Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(6), 803–831. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X98001769
- Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Understanding complex systems: Some core challenges. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501_7
- Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Jordan, R., Eberbach, C., & Sinha, S. (2017). Systems learning with a conceptual representation: A quasi-experimental study. Instructional Science, 45(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9392-y
- Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Marathe, S., & Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701413401
- Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Pfeffer, M. G. (2004). Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2801_7
- Ifenthaler, D., Masduki, I., & Seel, N. M. (2011). The mystery of cognitive structure and how we can detect it: Tracking the development of cognitive structures over time. Instructional Science, 39(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9097-6
- Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500
- Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Gottdenker, J. (2005). Model building for conceptual change. Interactive Learning Environments, 13(1–2), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820500173292
- Kim, Y. R., Park, M. S., Moore, T. J., & Varma, S. (2013). Multiple levels of metacognition and their elicitation through complex problem-solving tasks. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.04.002
- Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
- Laverty, J. T., Underwood, S. M., Matz, R. L., Posey, L. A., Carmel, J. H., Caballero, M. D., Fata-Hartley, C. L., Ebert-May, D., Jardeleza, S. E., & Cooper, M. M. (2016). Characterizing college science assessments: The three-dimensional learning assessment protocol. PloS one, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162333
- Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2012). Seeding evolutionary thinking by engaging children in modeling its foundations. Science Education, 96(4), 701–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20475
- Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2015). The development of scientific thinking (pp. 1–44). Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science.
- Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., & Lucas, D. (2008). Supporting development of the epistemology of inquiry. Cognitive Development, 23(4), 512–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.001
- Louca, L. T., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2012). Modeling-based learning in science education: Cognitive, metacognitive, social, material and epistemological contributions. Educational Review, 64(4), 471–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.628748
- Lublin, J. (2003). Deep, surface and strategic approaches to learning. Centre for teaching and learning (pp. 1–11). UCD Dublin.
- Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I—outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
- Miller, E., Manz, E., Russ, R., Stroupe, D., & Berland, L. (2018). Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room: Epistemic agency and the next generation science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21459
- Namdar, B., & Shen, J. (2015). Modeling-oriented assessment in K-12 science education: A synthesis of research from 1980 to 2013 and new directions. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 993–1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1012185
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
- National Research Council. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School. In J.D. Bransford & L. Brown (Eds.), How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School (pp. 1–12). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- National Research Council. (2005). How students learn: Science in the classroom. Committee on how people learn, a targeted report for teachers. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), Division of behavioral and social sciences and education (pp. 1–12). Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press.
- Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2011). Item feature effects in evolution assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(3), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20400
- Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004
- Postareff, L., Parpala, A., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2015). Factors contributing to changes in a deep approach to learning in different learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 18(3), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9186-1
- Reiser, B. J., Berland, L. K., & Kenyon, L. (2012). Engaging students in the scientific practices of explanation and argumentation. Science and Children, 49(8), 8–13.
- Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Li, M. (2015). The relationship between item context characteristics and student performance: The case of the 2006 and 2009 PISA science items. Teachers College Record, 117(1), 1–36.
- Russ, R. S., Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., & Hutchison, P. (2009). Making classroom assessment more accountable to scientific reasoning: A case for attending to mechanistic thinking. Science Education, 93(5), 875–891. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20320
- Russ, R. S., Scherr, R. E., Hammer, D., & Mikeska, J. (2008). Recognizing mechanistic reasoning in student scientific inquiry: A framework for discourse analysis developed from philosophy of science. Science Education, 92(3), 499–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20264
- Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311
- Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science, 328(5977), 450–452. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182597
- Son, L. K. (2013). Metacognition. Oxford University Press.
- Stein, B. S., Way, K. R., Benningfield, S. E., & Hedgecough, C. A. (1986). Constraints on spontaneous transfer in problem-solving tasks. Memory & Cognition, 14(5), 432–441. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197018
- Stratford, S. J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Secondary students’ dynamic modeling processes: Analyzing, reasoning about, synthesizing, and testing models of stream ecosystems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7(3), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021840407112
- Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Veeman, M. V. J. (2012). Metacognition in science education: Definitions, constituents, and their intricate relation with cognition. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research (pp. 21–36). Springer.
- Wang, T., Li, M., Thummaphan, P., & Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2017). The effect of sequential cues of item contexts in science assessment. International Journal of Testing, 17(4), 322–350.
- Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20259