References
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199807)82:4<417::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-E
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050044044
- Alabdulkareem, S. A. (2016). The impact of science teachers’ beliefs on teaching science: The case of Saudi science teachers. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n2p233
- Alanazi, F. (2018). Saudi children’s taxonomic knowledge of animal species. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(3), 395–413. http://oaji.net/articles/2017/987-1529508794.pdf.
- Alanazi, F. H. (2019). The perceptions of students in secondary school in regard to evolution-based teaching: Acceptance and evolution learning experiences: The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9827-y
- Alarfaj, M. M. (2015). Science education in Saudi Arabia: A response to controversial issues. In N. Mansour & S. Al-Shamrani (Eds.), Science education in the Arab Gulf states (pp. 155–168). Brill/Sense.
- Aldahmash, A. H., & Alshaya, F. S. (2012). Secondary school students’ alternative conceptions about genetics. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 16(1), 1–21.
- Alghamdi, A. K. H., & Malikan, M. (2020). Saudi science teachers’ perceptions of the cultural factors influencing elementary students’ science learning. Cultural Studies of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09960-9
- Allahmorad, S., & Zreik, S. (2020, April 9). Education in Saudi Arabia. World Education News and Reviews. https://wenr.wes.org/2020/04/education-in-saudi-arabia
- Al Lily, E. A. (2011). On line and under veil: Technology-facilitated communication and Saudi female experience within academia. Technology in Society, 33(1), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2011.03.005
- Almuhesin, A. (1999). Teaching science. Alobikan.
- Al Zahrani, N. (2017). . Dawr muelimiun allughat al'anjaliziat fi tahqiq ruyat almamlakat 2030 dirasatan aistiqsayiyatan [The role of the English language teacher in achieving the Kingdom's Vision 2030]. Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, 1(1), 1–17.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/online/sfaatoc.htm
- Asghar, A., Hameed, S., & Farahani, N. K. (2014). Evolution in biology textbooks: A comparative analysis of 5 Muslim countries. Journal of Religion & Education, 41(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2014.855081
- Authors. (2019). Manuscript submitted for publication.
- Brinkmann, S. (2015). Learner-centred education reforms in India: The missing piece of teachers’ beliefs. Policy Futures in Education, 13(3), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210315569038
- Bucaille, M. (2014, November 22). The Qur’an and modern science [Web log post]. https://www.whyislam.org/on-faith/the-quran-and-modern-science-3/
- DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
- Deffree, S. (2018, October 3). German rocket is first to reach space, October 3, 1942. https://www.edn.com/electronics-blogs/edn-moments/4397678/German-rocket-is-1st-to- reach-space–October-3–1942
- Dogan, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2008). Turkish grade 10 students’ and science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A national study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1083–1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20243
- Gandolfi, H. E. (2017). Teaching about nature of science in secondary education: A view from multicultural classrooms. School Science Review, 98(365), 77–84.
- Hasse, D. N. (2014). Influence of Arabic and Islamic philosophy on the Latin West. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Online Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/arabic-islamic-influence/
- Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science. Brill/Sense.
- Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (2016). Vision 2030. https://vision2030.gov.sa/sites/default/files/report/Saudi_Vision2030_EN_2017.pdf
- Lam, T. C., Allen, G., & Green, K. E. (2010, May). Is “neutral” on a Likert scale the same as “don’t know” for informed and uninformed respondents? Effects of serial position and labeling on selection of response options [Paper presentation]. National Council on Measurement in Education Annual Meeting, Denver, CO, USA. https://portfolio.du.edu/downloadChildItem/78196
- Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290404
- Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 5–55.
- Liu, S.-Y., Lin, C.-S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2011). College students’ scientific epistemological views and thinking patterns in socioscientific decision making. Science Education, 95(3), 479–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20422.
- Livingston, E. H., & Wislar, J. S. (2012). Minimum response rates for survey research. Journal of the American Medical Association Surgery, 147(2), 110. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2011.2169
- Maness, M., Sheela, P., & Balusu, S. (2018, June 24–27). When neutral responses on a Likert scale do not mean opinion neutrality: Accounting for unsure responses in a hybrid choice modelling framework [Paper presentation]. 7th Innovations in Travel Modeling Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/Conferences/2018/ITM/MManess.pdf
- Mansour, N. (2010). Science teachers’ interpretations of Islamic culture related to science education versus the Islamic epistemology and ontology of science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(1), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-009-9214-5
- Mansour, N. (2011). Science teachers’ views of science and religion vs. The Islamic perspective: Conflicting or compatible? Science Education, 95(2), 281–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20418
- McComas, W. F. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education (pp. 53–70). Kluwer.
- McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education (pp. 3–39). Kluwer.
- McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education (pp. 41–52). Kluwer.
- McGregor, S. L. T. (2018). Understanding and evaluating research. SAGE.
- Nadler, J. T., Weston, R., & Voyles, E. C. (2015). Stuck in the middle: The use and interpretation of mid-points items on questionnaires. Journal of General Psychology, 142(2), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2014.994590
- Reiss, M. J. (2004). Students’ attitudes towards science: A long term perspective. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150409556599
- Saif, A. D. A. (2016). The nature of science as viewed by science teachers in Najran District, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(12), 147–153.
- Salleh, K. M., Othman, M. Y. H., Radiman, S., Dakir, J., Tamuri, A. H., Alwi, N. H., Jumali, M. H., Halim, L., & Badzis, M. (2011). Teachers’ concerns, perception and acceptance toward Tauhidic science education. Kyoto Bulletin of Islamic Area Studies, 4(1/2), 124–155. https://doi.org/10.14989/154027.
- Sardar, Z. (1998). Science in Islamic philosophy. In E. Craig (Ed.), Islamic philosophy (pp. 561–565). Routledge.
- Sontay, G., & Karamustafaoglu, O. (2018). The effect of out-of-school science learning environment on the understanding the nature of science of the 7th grade students in secondary school. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(4), 23–31.
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage publications.
- Taber, K. S., Billingsley, B., Riga, F., & Newdick, N. (2011). Secondary students’ responses to perceptions of the relationship between science and religion: Stances identified from an interview study. Science Education, 95(6), 1000–1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20459
- Temel, S., Şen, Ş, & Özcan, Ö. (2017). Validity and reliability analyses for the nature of science instrument secondary (NOSI-S). Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(3), 429–437. http://oaji.net/articles/2017/987-1497964369.pdf.
- Tsai, C.-C., & Liu, S.-Y. (2005). Developing a multidimensional instrument for assessing students’ epistemological views toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 27(13), 1621–1638. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500206432
- Tsukerman, I. (2018, November 23). Saudi Arabia’s progress in science is real, measurable, and speaks for itself. Saudi Arabia Future. https://saudi-arabia-future.org/saudi-arabia-sciencereal-measurable/
- Ward, M. (2018, August 8). India’s impressive concept about nothing. BBC Travel. http://www.bbc.com/travel/story/20180807-how-india-gave-us-the-zero
- Weakliem, D. L. (2002). The effects of education on political opinions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(2), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.2.141
- Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues in education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048