2,882
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Pre-university students’ conceptions regarding radiation and radioactivity in a medical context

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 179-196 | Received 03 Feb 2020, Accepted 11 Dec 2020, Published online: 07 Jan 2021

References

  • Bower, E. O., & Robinson, E. P. (1955). Dynamic physics. Rand McNally.
  • Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1994). Children’s ideas about radioactivity and radiation: Sources, mode of travel, uses and dangers. Research in Science & Technological Education, 12(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514940120204
  • Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1997). Children’s models of understanding of two major global environmental issues (ozone layer and greenhouse effect). Research in Science & Technological Education, 15(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514970150102
  • Cao, J. C., & Dominguez Castineiras, J. M. (2016). Student ideas concerning radioactivity at the end of secondary school and their relation to textbooks and the media. A case study. Ensenanza de las Ciencias, 34(3), 113–142. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1959
  • Chi, M. T., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1981). Expertise in problem solving. Univ PA Learning Research and Development Center.
  • Colclough, N. D., Lock, R., & Soares, A. (2011). Pre-service teachers’ subject knowledge of and attitudes about radioactivity and ionising radiation. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 423–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500691003639905
  • Council, N. R. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
  • DiSessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. L. (1998). What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1155–1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980201002
  • Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography STCSE: Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. University of Kiel.
  • Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016
  • Dull, C. E., Metcalfde, H. C., & Brooks, W. O. (1955). Modern physics. H. Holt and Co.
  • Education, D. O. (2015). The national curriculum in Engeland; Key stages 3 and 4 framework document. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/381754/SECONDARY_national_curriculum.pdf
  • Eijkelhof, H. (1996). Radiation risk and science education. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 68(3–4), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a031878
  • Eijkelhof, H. M. C. (1990c). Radiation and risk in physics education. CD Beta Press.
  • Eijkelhof, H., Klaassen, C., Lijnse, P., & Scholte, R. (1990a). Perceived incidence and importance of lay-ideas on ionizing radiation: Results of a delphi-study among radiation-experts. Science Education, 74(2), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740205
  • EPZ. (2020). https://epz.nl/themas/milieu-gezondheid/radioactiviteit-gevaarlijk
  • Freudenberg, L. S., & Beyer, T. (2011). Subjective perception of radiation risk. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 52(Supplement 2), 29S–35S. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.110.085720
  • Hammer, D. (1996). More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research. American Journal of Physics, 64(10), 1316–1325. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18376
  • Hawkins, B., & Phelps, W. (1975). A course in nuclear radiation for all high school students. The Physics Teacher, 13(5), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2339152
  • Hunt, E., & Minstrell, J. (1996). Effective instruction in science and mathematics: Psychological principles and social constraints. Issues in Education, 2(2), 123–162.
  • Kaczmarek, R., Bednarek, D. R., & Wong, R. (1987). Misconceptions of medical students about radiological physics. Health Physics, 52(1), 106–107.
  • Kendeou, P., & O’Brien, E. J. (2014). The knowledge revision components (KReC) framework: Processes and mechanisms. In D. N. Rapp, & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 353–377). Boston Review.
  • Kim, Y. (2016). The radiation problem and its solution from a health communication perspective. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 31(Suppl 1), S88–S98. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.S1.S88
  • Leuchter, M., Saalbach, H., Studhalter, U., & Tettenborn, A. (2020). Teaching for conceptual change in preschool science: Relations among teachers’ professional beliefs, knowledge, and instructional practice. International Journal of Science Education, 42(12), 1941–1967. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1805137
  • Lijnse, P., Eijkelhof, H., Klaassen, C., & Scholte, R. (1990). Pupils’ and mass-media ideas about radioactivity. International Journal of Science Education, 12(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069900120106
  • McLure, F., Won, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2020). Students’ understanding of the emergent processes of natural selection: The need for ontological conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 42(9), 1485–1805. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1767315
  • Millar, R., & Gill, J. S. (1996). School students' understanding of processes involving radioactive substances and ionizing radiation. Physics Education, 31(1), 27.
  • Mortimer, E. F. (1995). Conceptual change or conceptual profile change? Science & Education, 4(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486624
  • Mortimer, E. F., & El-Hani, C. N. (2014). Conceptual profiles: A theory of teaching and learning scientific concepts (Vol. 42). Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Mubeen, S. M., Abbas, Q., & Nisar, N. (2008). Knowledge about ionising and non-ionising radiation among medical students. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad: JAMC, 20(1), 118–121.
  • Muhr, T. (2016). Atlat.ti 8.0. Germany. www.atlatti.com
  • Nakiboǧlu, C., & Tekin, B. B. (2006). Identifying students’ misconceptions about nuclear chemistry. A study of Turkish high school students. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(11), 1712–1718. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed083p1712
  • NEA. (1920). Reorganization of science in secondary schools: A report of the national education association of the United States. Commission on the reorganization of secondary education. US Government Printing Office.
  • Neumann, S., & Hopf, M. (2012). Students’ conceptions about ‘radiation’: Results from an explorative interview study of 9th grade students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(6), 826–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9369-9
  • Neumann, S., & Hopf, M. (2013). Students’ ideas about nuclear radiation – before and after Fukushima. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 9(4), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.948a
  • NiNa. (2006). Physics is alive (Natuurkunde leeft). http://www.nieuwenatuurkunde.nl/about
  • NiNa. (2010). New Physics; advisory curriculum at pre-university level (Nieuwe natuurkunde; advies-examenprogramma’s voor havo en vwo). http://www.betanova.nl/downloads/eindadviezen/Eindadvies_20Natuurkunde.pdf/
  • Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1988). Bibliography. Students’ alternative frameworks and science education.
  • Plotz, T. (2016). Students’ conceptions of radiation and what to do about them. Physics Education, 52(1), 014004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/52/1/014004
  • Potvin, P. (2017). The coexistence claim and its possible implications for success in teaching for conceptual “change”. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 55–66.
  • Prather, E. E., & Harrington, R. R. (2001). Student understanding of ionizing radiation and radioactivity. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31(2), 89–93.
  • Rego, F., & Peralta, L. (2006). Portuguese students' knowledge of radiation physics. Physics Education, 41(3), 259.
  • Resnick, M. (1996). Beyond the centralized mindset. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0501_1
  • Ricketts, M. L., Baerlocher, M. O., Asch, M. R., & Myers, A. (2013). Perception of radiation E exposure and risk among patients, medical students, and referring physicians at a tertiary care community hospital. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal- Journal De L Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes, 64(3), 208–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2012.05.002
  • Riesch, W., & Westphal, W. (1975). Model student presentations on the propagation of radioactive radiation. (Modellhafte Schülervorstellungen zur Ausbreitung radioaktiver Strahlung). Der Physikunterricht 9, 75.
  • Sesen, B. A., & Elif, I. (2010). Internet as a source of misconception: “Radiation and radioactivity”. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(4), 94–100.
  • Sin, H. K., Wong, C. S., Huang, B., Yiu, K. L., Wong, W. L., & Chu, Y. C. T. (2013). Assessing local patients’ knowledge and awareness of radiation dose and risks associated with medical imaging: A questionnaire study. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology, 57(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9485.2012.02471.x
  • Smith, E. L., Blakeslee, T. D., & Anderson, C. W. (1993). Teaching strategies associated with conceptual change learning in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300202
  • Smith III, J. P., DiSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1
  • States, N. L. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
  • Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1985). A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In L. West, & L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 259–266). Academic Press.
  • Vosniadou, S. (2019). The development of students’ understanding of science. Frontiers in Education, 4(32), https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00032.