Challenges in designing and assessing student interdisciplinary learning of optics using a representation construction approach

References

• Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R.(2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–1097. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin, D. F., & Lee, H. (2005). Integrating science and mathematics education: Historical analysis. School Science and Mathematics, 105(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18032.x
   Google Scholar
• Broggy, J., O’Reilly, J., & Erduran, S. (2017). Interdisciplinarity and science education. In K. S. Taber & B. Akpan (Eds.), Science Education. New directions in mathematics and science education (pp. 81–90). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, V. (2018). Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2850–2861.Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol23/iss11/14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guesne, E. (1985). Light. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children’s ideas in science (pp. 10–32). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K–12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurley, M. M. (2001). Reviewing integrated science and mathematics: The search for evidence and definitions from new perspectives. School Science and Mathematics, 101(5), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18028.x
   Google Scholar
• King, D., & English, L. D. (2016). Engineering design in the primary school: Applying stem concepts to build an optical instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 38(18), 2762–2794. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1262567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leuwin, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1989). Visualisation and cognition: Drawing things together. In H. Kuklick (Ed.), Knowledge and society studies in the sociology of culture past and ppresent (pp. 1–40). Jai Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 371–387). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2012). Seeding evolutionary thinking by engaging children in modeling its foundations. Science Education, 96(4), 701–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2019). Learning to play the modeling game. In A. U. z. Belzen, D. Kruger, & J. v. Driel (Eds.), Towards a competence-based view on models and modeling in science Education: Models and modeling in science education (pp. 221–236). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Manz, E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2020). Rethinking the classroom science investigation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(7), 1148–1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. F., Black, P. J., Meadows, J. M., & Smith, M. (1993). Young children's (7-11) ideas about light and their development. International Journal of Science Education, 15(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069930150107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, J., & Good, R. (2000). A review of the integration of science and mathematics: Implications for further research. School Science and Mathematics, 100(2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17239.x
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1998). The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Vol. 2). Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1974). Understanding Causality. W. W. Norton and Company Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Prain, V. (2019). Future research in learning with, through and from scientific representations. In V. Prain & B. Hand (Eds.), Theorizing the Future of Science Education Research (pp. 151–168). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Prain, V., & Tytler, R.(2012). Learning through constructing representations in science: A framework of representational construction affordances. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2751–2773. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.626462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2006). An exploratory study of teachers’ and students’ use of multi-modal representations of concepts in primary science. International Journal of Science Education , 28(15), 1843–1866. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600718294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ríordáin, M. N., Johnston, J., & Walshe, G. (2016). Making mathematics and science integration happen: Key aspects of practice. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1078001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M. (1993). Construction sites: Science labs and classrooms. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 145–170). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Selley, N. J. (1996a). Children’s ideas on light and vision. International Journal of Science Education, 18(6), 713–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selley, N. J. (1996b). Towards a phenomenography of light and vision. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 837–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinson, K., Harkness, S. S., Meyer, H., & Stallworth, J. (2009). Mathematics and science integration: Models and characterizations. School Science and Mathematics, 109(3), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.tb17951.x
   Google Scholar
• Treacy, P., & O’Donoghue, J. (2014). Authentic integration: A model for integrating mathematics and science in the classroom. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(5), 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.868543
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., Mulligan, J., White, P., & Kirk, M. (in press). Promoting effective interactions between mathematics and science: Challenges of learning through interdisciplinarity. In Y. Li, Z. Zeng, & N. Song (Eds.). Changes and Innovations in disciplinary and interdisciplinary Education in STEM: An international perspective. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., Prain, V., Aranda, G., Ferguson, J., & Gorur, R. (2020). Drawing to reason and learn in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., Prain, V., Hubber, P., & Waldrip, B. (Eds.) (2013). Constructing representations to learn in science. Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Venville, G., Rennie, L. J., & Wallace, J. (2012). Curriculum integration: Challenging the assumption of school science as powerful knowledge. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second International Handbook of science Education (pp. 737–749). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1981). Thought and language (revised and edited by A. Kozulin). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldrip, B., Prain, V., & Carolan, J. (2010). Using Multi-Modal Representations to Improve Learning in Junior Secondary Science. Research in Science Education , 40(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9157-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar