1,926
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How outdoor science education can help girls stay engaged with science

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1090-1111 | Received 15 Jan 2020, Accepted 05 Mar 2021, Published online: 22 Mar 2021

References

  • Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1997). Gender differences in small group discussion in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 19(4), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190403
  • Andre, T., Whigham, M., Hendrickson, A., & Chambers, S. (1999). Competency beliefs, positive affect, and gender stereotypes of elementary students and their parents about science versus other school subjects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(6), 719–747. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199908)36:6<719::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-R
  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20399
  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). “Balancing acts”: Elementary school girls’ negotiations of femininity, achievement, and science. Science Education, 96(6), 967–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21031
  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & Wong, B. (2014). Spheres of influence: What shapes young people’s aspirations at age 12/13 and what are the implications for education policy? Journal of Education Policy, 29(1), 58–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.790079
  • Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., Roth, N. W., & Holthuis, N. (2018). Environmental education and K-12 student outcomes: A review and analysis of research. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2017.1366155
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  • Barton, A. C., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68–103. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308641
  • Beames, S., & Atencio, M. (2008). Building social capital through outdoor education. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 8(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729670802256868
  • Beede, D. N., Julian, T. A., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., & Doms, M. E. (2011). Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1964782). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1964782
  • Blair, D. (2009). The child in the garden: An evaluative review of the benefits of school gardening. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(2), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.2.15-38
  • Blumberg, R. L. (2007). Gender bias in textbooks: A hidden obstacle on the road to gender equality in education (Paper Commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2008, Education for All by 2015: Will We Make It, p. 54). United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization.
  • Bottia, M. C., Stearns, E., Mickelson, R. A., Moller, S., & Valentino, L. (2015). Growing the roots of STEM majors: Female math and science high school faculty and the participation of students in STEM. Economics of Education Review, 45, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.01.002
  • Braun, S. M. (2020). Outdoor school for all: Diverse programming and outcomes in Oregon. 2019 Evaluation Report. (p. 50). Oregon State University Extension.
  • Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20131
  • Brotman, J. S., & Moore, F. M. (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 971–1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20241
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
  • Burkam, D. T., Lee, V. E., & Smerdon, B. A. (1997). Gender and science learning early in high school: Subject matter and laboratory experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 297–331. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312034002297
  • Carli, L. L., Alawa, L., Lee, Y., Zhao, B., & Kim, E. (2016). Stereotypes about gender and science: Women ≠ scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315622645
  • Carlone, H. B., Haun-Frank, J., & Webb, A. (2011). Assessing equity beyond knowledge- and skills-based outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth-grade reform-based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20413
  • Carlone, H. B., Scott, C. M., & Lowder, C. (2014). Becoming (less) scientific: A longitudinal study of students’ identity work from elementary to middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 836–869. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21150
  • Carrier, S. J. (2009). Environmental education in the schoolyard: Learning styles and gender. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(3), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.3.2-12
  • Carrier, S. J., & Stevenson, K. (2017). Children experiencing the outdoors: A natural setting for learning. In E. Kimonen & R. Nevalainen (Eds.), Reforming Teaching and Teacher Education (pp. 67–88). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-917-1_3
  • Carrier, S. J., Tugurian, L. P., & Thomson, M. M. (2013). Elementary science indoors and out: Teachers, time, and testing. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 2059–2083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9347-5
  • Cavallo, A. M. L., & Laubach, T. A. (2001). Students’ science perceptions and enrollment decisions in differing learning cycle classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(9), 1029–1062. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1046
  • Cheng, J. C.-H., & Monroe, M. C. (2012). Connection to nature: Children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behavior, 44(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510385082
  • Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 49. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049
  • Chun, H., & Devall, E. (2019). A parental involvement and academic socialization model: A cultural approach. School Psychology, 34(5), 555–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000330
  • Collins, K. H. (2018). Confronting color-blind STEM talent development: Toward a contextual model for Black student STEM identity. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29(2), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X18757958
  • Collins, K. H., Joseph, N. M., & Ford, D. Y. (2020). Missing in action: Gifted Black girls in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Gifted Child Today, 43(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217519880593
  • Crenshaw, K. (1998). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 31. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
  • Cundiff, J. L., Vescio, T. K., Loken, E., & Lo, L. (2013). Do gender–science stereotypes predict science identification and science career aspirations among undergraduate science majors? Social Psychology of Education, 16(4), 541–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9232-8
  • Dare, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2016). “If I had to do it, then I would”: Understanding early middle school students’ perceptions of physics and physics-related careers by gender. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020117. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020117
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
  • Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014). Girls and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: STEMing the tide and broadening participation in STEM careers. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214549471
  • Davidson, C. (2016). Building character through adventure education: A study of levels of grit and resilience in outward bound students [Ph.D.]. Indiana University. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1792645079/abstract/1DFEC97AFF154571PQ/1
  • de Boer, H., Bosker, R. J., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2010). Sustainability of teacher expectation bias effects on long-term student performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017289
  • Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 86(320), 107–111.
  • Donovan, B. M., Stuhlsatz, M. A. M., Edelson, D. C., & Buck Bracey, Z. E. (2019). Gendered genetics: How reading about the genetic basis of sex differences in biology textbooks could affect beliefs associated with science gender disparities. Science Education, 103(4), 719–749. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21502
  • Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371
  • Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618804166
  • Eberbach, C., & Crowley, K. (2009). From everyday to scientific observation: How children learn to observe the biologist’s world. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 39–68. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325899
  • Eick, C. J. (2012). Use of the outdoor classroom and nature-study to support science and literacy learning: A narrative case study of a third-grade classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 789–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9236-1
  • Ernst, J. (2007). Factors associated with K-12 teachers’ use of environment-based education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(3), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.38.3.15-32
  • Ernst, J. (2009). Influences on US middle school teachers’ use of environment-based education. Environmental Education Research, 15(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802710599
  • Faber Taylor, A., & Kuo, F. E. (2009). Children With attention deficits concentrate better after walk in the park. Journal of Attention Disorders, 12(5), 402–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054708323000
  • Finney, C. (2014). Black faces, white spaces: Reimagining the relationship of African Americans to the great outdoors. University of North Carolina Press.
  • Flett, G. L., & Hewitt, P. L. (2014). A proposed framework for preventing perfectionism and promoting resilience and mental health among vulnerable children and adolescents. Psychology in the Schools, 51(9), 899–912. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21792
  • Floyd, M. F. (1998). Getting beyond marginality and ethnicity: The challenge for race and ethnic studies in leisure research. Journal of Leisure Research, 30(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1998.11949816
  • Floyd, M. F. (2014). Social Justice as an integrating force for leisure research. Leisure Sciences, 36(4), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2014.917002
  • Floyd, M. F., & Johnson, C. Y. (2002). Coming to terms with environmental justice in outdoor recreation: A conceptual discussion with research implications. Leisure Sciences, 24(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400252772836
  • Ford, D. (2013). Recruiting and retaining culturally different students in gifted education. Prufrock Press.
  • Fredricks, J. A., Hofkens, T., Wang, M.-T., Mortenson, E., & Scott, P. (2018). Supporting girls’ and boys’ engagement in math and science learning: A mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21419
  • Gilbert, J. (2001). Science and its ‘other’: Looking underneath ‘woman’ and ‘science’ for new directions in research on gender and science education. Gender and Education, 13(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250120063571
  • Gilbert, M. A. (2008). Defeating bigenderism: Changing gender assumptions in the twenty-first century. Hypatia, 24(3), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01047.x
  • Gilbert, A., & Yerrick, R. (2001). Same school, separate worlds: A sociocultural study of identity, resistance, and negotiation in a rural, lower track science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 574–598. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1019
  • Gray, T., & Pigott, F. (2018). Lasting lessons in outdoor learning: A facilitation model emerging from 30 years of reflective practice. Ecopsychology, 10(4), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2018.0036
  • Harris, A., & Leonardo, Z. (2018). Intersectionality. Race-Gender Subordination, and Education. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18759071
  • Häussler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (2002). An intervention study to enhance girls’ interest, self-concept, and achievement in physics classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 870–888. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10048
  • Heard, P. F., Divall, S. A., & Johnson, S. D. (2000). Can ‘ears-on’ help hands-on science learning for girls and boys? International Journal of Science Education, 22(11), 1133–1146. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050166715
  • Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. AAUW.
  • Howes, E. V. (1998). Connecting girls and science: A feminist teacher research study of a high school prenatal testing unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(8), 877–896. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199810)35:8<877::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-R
  • Jones, M. G., Howe, A., & Rua, M. J. (2000). Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84(2), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<180::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-X
  • Joseph, N. M., Hailu, M., & Boston, D. (2017). Black women’s and girls’ persistence in the P–20 mathematics pipeline: Two decades of children, youth, and adult education research. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 203–227. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16689045
  • Joseph, N. M., Hailu, M. F., & Matthews, J. S. (2019). Normalizing Black girls’ humanity in mathematics classrooms. Harvard Educational Review, 89(1), 132–155. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-89.1.132
  • Kelleher, C., Pausch, R., & Kiesler, S. (2007, April 28–May 3). Storytelling motivates middle school girls to learn computer programming. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI’07, San Jose, CA, USA (pp. 1455–1464). https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240844
  • Kellert, S. R., Case, D. J., Escher, D., Witter, D. J., Mikels-Carrasco, J., & Seng, P. T. (2017). The Nature of Americans: Disconnection and recommendations for reconnection. https://natureofamericans.org/sites/default/files/reports/Nature-of-Americans_National_Report_1.3_4-26-17.pdf
  • King, N. S., & Pringle, R. M. (2019). Black girls speak STEM: Counterstories of informal and formal learning experiences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(5), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21513
  • Kuo, M., Barnes, M., & Jordan, C. (2019). Do experiences with nature promote learning? Converging evidence of a cause-and-effect relationship. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 305. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00305
  • Larson, L. R., Whiting, J. W., & Green, G. T. (2011). Exploring the influence of outdoor recreation participation on pro-environmental behaviour in a demographically diverse population. Local Environment, 16(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2010.548373
  • Latino Outdoors. (2020). Latino outdoors – Connecting cultura y community with the outdoors. https://latinooutdoors.org/
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lee, V. E., & Burkam, D. T. (1996). Gender differences in middle grade science achievement: Subject domain, ability level, and course emphasis. Science Education, 80(6), 613–650. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199611)80:6<613::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-M
  • Lindemann, D., Britton, D., & Zundl, E. (2016). “I don’t know why they make it so hard here”: Institutional factors and undergraduate women’s STEM participation. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 8(2), 221–241.
  • Martin, C. L., Andrews, N. C. Z., England, D. E., Zosuls, K., & Ruble, D. N. (2017). A dual identity approach for conceptualizing and measuring children’s gender identity. Child Development, 88(1), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12568
  • Meece, J. L., & Jones, M. G. (1996). Gender differences in motivation and strategy use in science: Are girls rote learners? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(4), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199604)33:4<393::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-N
  • Moses, M. S., & Nanna, M. J. (2007). The testing culture and the persistence of high stakes testing reforms. Education and Culture, 23(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1353/eac.2007.0010
  • Nation, J. M., Harlow, D., Arya, D. J., & Longtin, M. (2019). Being and becoming scientists. Afterschool Matters, 29, 36–44.
  • National Research Council. (2005). How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom (p. 10126). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10126
  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00059/full
  • National Science Foundation. (2019). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (2019. Special Report NSF 19-304). https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd
  • NC DPI. (2012). NC essential standards for science. http://www.dpi.state.nc.us/docs/curriculum/science/scos/support-tools/new-standards/science/3-5.pdf
  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.
  • Noonan, R. (2017). Women in STEM: 2017 update (ESA Issue Brief #06-17) (p. 21). Office of the Chief Economist, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Department of Commerce. https://www.commerce.gov/sites/default/files/migrated/reports/women-in-stem-2017-update.pdf
  • Outdoor Afro. (2020). Outdoor Afro: Where black people & nature meet. https://outdoorafro.com/
  • Pajares, F., & Britner, S. L. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race, and gender in middle school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7(4), 15. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v7.i4.10
  • Peoples, S. M., & O’Dwyer, L. M. (2014). The nature of science instrument-elementary (NOSI-E): The end of the road? Journal of Applied Measurement, 15(4), 338–358.
  • Quinn, D. M., & Cooc, N. (2015). Science achievement gaps by gender and race/ethnicity in elementary and middle school: Trends and predictors. Educational Researcher, 44(6), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15598539
  • Rhodes, M., Leslie, S.-J., Yee, K. M., & Saunders, K. (2019). Subtle linguistic cues increase girls’ engagement in science. Psychological Science, 30(3), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618823670
  • Riedinger, K., & Taylor, A. (2016). The potential of out-of-school time programs to influence girls’ identities in science. Afterschool Matters, 23, 107.
  • Riegle-Crumb, C., Moore, C., & Ramos-Wada, A. (2011). Who wants to have a career in science or math? Exploring adolescents’ future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity: Equity in future career aspirations. Science Education, 95(3), 458–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20431
  • Robnett, R. D. (2016). Gender bias in STEM fields: Variation in prevalence and links to STEM self-concept. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315596162
  • Roychoudhury, A., Tippins, D. J., & Nichols, S. E. (1995). Gender-inclusive science teaching: A feminist-constructivist approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(9), 897–924. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320904
  • Salabert, S. (2019, May 5). Connecting kids to nature in a disconnected world. Sierra Club. https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/2019-3-may-june/feature/connecting-kids-nature-disconnected-world
  • Sanacore, J. (2017). Will Obama’s my brother’s keeper and similar initiatives have a positive impact on low-income students? The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 90(4), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2017.1330591
  • Schinske, J. N., Perkins, H., Snyder, A., & Wyer, M. (2016). Scientist spotlight homework assignments shift students’ stereotypes of scientists and enhance science identity in a diverse introductory science class. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), ar47. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0002
  • Schuttler, S. G., Stevenson, K., Kays, R., & Dunn, R. R. (2019). Children’s attitudes towards animals are similar across suburban, exurban, and rural areas. PeerJ, 7, e7328. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7328
  • Schwartz, R. A., Bower, B. L., Rice, D. C., & Washington, C. M. (2003). “Ain’t I a woman, too?”: Tracing the experiences of African American women in graduate school. The Journal of Negro Education, 72(3), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211247
  • Sheu, H.-B., Lent, R. W., Miller, M. J., Penn, L. T., Cusick, M. E., & Truong, N. N. (2018). Sources of self-efficacy and outcome expectations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics domains: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 109, 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.003
  • Solorzano, D. G. (1998). Critical race theory, race and gender microaggressions, and the experience of Chicana and Chicano scholars. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/095183998236926
  • Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., Bondell, H. D., Mertig, A. G., & Moore, S. E. (2013). Environmental, institutional, and demographic predictors of environmental literacy among middle school children. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e59519. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059519
  • Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., Carrier, S. J., Strnad, R. L., Olson, R. A., & Szczytko, R. E. (2019). Making the case for a null effects framework in environmental education and K-12 academic outcomes: When “just as good” Is a great thing. Frontiers in Communication, 3, 59. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00059
  • Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2015). Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic, or social equality. Intelligence, 48(1), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.11.006.
  • Szczytko, R., Carrier, S. J., & Stevenson, K. T. (2018). Impacts of outdoor environmental education on teacher reports of attention, behavior, and learning outcomes for students with emotional, cognitive, and behavioral disabilities. Frontiers in Education, 3, 46. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00046
  • Theobald, R., & Freeman, S. (2014). Is it the intervention or the students? Using linear regression to control for student characteristics in undergraduate STEM education research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe-13-07-0136
  • Unfried, A., Faber, M., Stanhope, D. S., & Wiebe, E. (2015). The development and validation of a measure of student attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and math (S-STEM). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(7), 622–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915571160
  • US Census Bureau. (2013). Women’s employment in science, tech, engineering and math jobs slowing. United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2013/cb13-162.html
  • Valencia, R. R. (2015). Students of color and the achievement gap: Systemic challenges, systemic transformations. Routledge.
  • Vygotskij, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Nachdr.). Harvard University Press.
  • Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
  • Wang, M.-T., Eccles, J. S., & Kenny, S. (2013). Not lack of ability but more choice: Individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological Science, 24(5), 770–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612458937
  • Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., Tipton, E., Schneider, B., Hulleman, C. S., Hinojosa, C. P., Paunesku, D., Romero, C., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Trott, J., Iachan, R., Buontempo, J., Yang, S. M., Carvalho, C. M., … Dweck, C. S. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573(7774), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y
  • Young, J. L. (2017). One book and One girl at a time: Analyzing and explaining Black girl’s reading achievement in elementary school. Literacy and Social Responsibility, 9(1), 9.
  • Young, J. L., Ero-Trolliver, I., Young, J. R., & Ford, D. Y. (2017). Maximizing opportunities to enroll in advanced high school science courses: Examining the scientific dispositions of Black girls. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 13, 174–183.
  • Zohar, A., & Sela, D. (2003). Her physics, his physics: Gender issues in Israeli advanced placement physics classes. International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210126766

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.