Supporting Spanish 11th grade students to make scientific writing when learning chemistry in English: the case of logical connectives

References

• Ai, B. (2016). Becoming a bilingual teacher in a Chinese university: A case study. Reflective Practice, 17(5), 605–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2016.1184637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Airey, J. (2012). “I don’t teach language”: The linguistic attitudes of physics lecturers in Sweden. AILA Review, 25, 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.25.05air
   Google Scholar
• Alberts, B. (2010). Priorizing science education. Science, 328(5977), 405. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1190788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A. (2014). Are science teachers prepared to promote argumentation? A case study with pre-service teachers in Bogotá city. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 15(1), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A. (2015). Uso de conectores y vocabulario espontaneo en la argumentación escrita: aportes a la alfabetización científica [Use of connectors and spontaneous vocabulary in written argumentation: Contributions to scientific literacy]. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 12(3), 402–418. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2015.v12.i3.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., Luna-Calderón, P., & Mesa-Piñeros, M. (2017). El empleo espontáneo de conectores y vocabulario relacionado con las ciencias: Implicaciones en la argumentación escrita [Spontaneous use of connectors and science-related vocabulary: Implications for written argumentation]. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 14(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2017.v14.i1.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., Molina, P., & Truscott de Mejía, A. M. (2020). Enriching university students’ use of logical connectors (LCs) in bilingual written scientific argumentation (BWSA). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1800586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubusson, P. J., Harrison, A. G., & Ritchie, S. M. (2006). Metaphors and analogies in science education. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Aull, L., & Lancaster, Z. (2014). Linguistic markers of stance in early and advanced academic writing: A corpus-based comparison. Written Communication, 31(2), 151–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088314527055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avraamidou, L., & Osborne, J. (2009). The role of narrative in communicating science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(12), 1683–1707. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802380695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, N. C. (2020). Evaluating the efficacy of using sentence frames for learning new vocabulary in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(3), 454–478. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, K., Nelson, G., & Hung, J. (2003). A corpus-based study of connectors in student writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 7(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.7.2.02bol
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, A. (2006). Sharing lived experience. How upper secondary school chemistry teachers and students use narratives to make chemistry more meaningful. Stockholm Institute of Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B. A. (2006). “It isn’t no slang that can be said about this stuff”: Language, identity, and appropriating science discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 96–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B. A., & Ryoo, K. (2008). Teaching science as a language: A ‘content-first’ approach to science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 529–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunch, G. C. (2013). Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 298–341. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X12461772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, M., Johnstone, A. H., & Pope, A. (1994). Reasoning in science: A language problem? School Science Review, 75(272), 103–107.
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, S. J. (2013). Elementary preservice teachers’ science vocabulary: Knowledge and application. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(2), 405–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9270-7
   Google Scholar
• Cassels, J. R. T., & Johnstone, A. H. (1985). Words that matter in science. The Royal Society of Chemistry.
   Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G. N., Barber, J., Dorph, R., Pearson, P. D., & Goldschmidt, P. G. (2012). The impact of an integrated approach to science and literacy in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(5), 631–658. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coll, R. K., France, B., & Taylor, I. (2005). The role of models/and analogies in science education: Implications from research. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000276712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colton, J. S., & Surasinghe, T. D. (2014). Using collaboration between English and Biology to teach scientific writing and communication. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(2), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst14_044_02_31
   Google Scholar
• Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL. Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crosson, A., & Lesaux, N. K. (2013a). Connectives. Fitting another piece of the vocabulary instruction puzzle. The Reading Teacher, 67(3), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.1197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosson, A., & Lesaux, N. K. (2013b). Does knowledge of connectives play a unique role in the reading comprehension of English learners and English-only students? Journal of Research in Reading, 36(3), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01501.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggleby, S. J., Tang, W., & Kwo-Newhouse, A. (2015). Does the use of connective words in written assessment predict high school students’ reading and writing achievement? Reading Psychology, 37(4), 511–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2015.1066910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J. (2010). The role of language in the learning and teaching science. In J. Osborne, & J. Dillon (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching. What practice has to say (pp. 135–157). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. (2005). Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education, 89(2), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fensham, P. J. (2004). Defining an identity. The evolution of science education as a field of research. Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S. A., Halim, A. S., Chambers, T. G., Moon, A., Goldman, R. S., Gere, A. R., & Shultz, G. V. (2017). Investigation of the influence of a writing-to-learn assignment on student understanding of polymer properties. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(11), 1610–1617. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulwiler, B. R. (2007). Writing in science: How to scaffold instruction to support learning. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. L. (1974). Language difficulties of science students. The Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 20(1), 63–76.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. L. (1975). Logical connectives in science: A preliminary report. Research in Science Education, 5(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02558621
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. L. (1980). Identification of specific difficulties with logical connectives in science among secondary school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17(3), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660170306
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. L., Schafe, L., Thein, U. M., & Watterson, R. (1976). Logical connectives in science: Some preliminary findings. Research in Science Education, 6(1), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02558654
   Google Scholar
• Garrat, J., Overton, T., & Threlfall, T. (1999). A question in chemistry. Creative problems for critical thinkers. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, S. M., & Muth, K. D. (1994). Reading and writing to learn science: Achieveing scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 1057–1073. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, M. L., & Quílez, J. (2011). Fundamentación y desarrollo de un modelo de aprendizaje integrado de Química e Inglés [Foundation and development of an integrated learning model for chemistry and English]. Anales de Química, 106(1), 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, A. Y. H., & Hyland, K. (2017). What is technicality? A technicality Analysis model for EAP vocabulary. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 28, 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science. The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, H. E. (2019). “See, you can make connections with the things You learned before!” Using the GRR to scaffold language and concept learning in science. The Gradual Release of Responsibility in Literacy Research and Practice Literacy Research, Practice and Evaluation, 10, 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2048-045820190000010012
   Google Scholar
• Hoadly, C. M., & Linn, M. (2000). Teaching science through online, peer discussions: SpeakEasy in the knowledge integration. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 839–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900412301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday, W. G., Yore, L. D., & Alvermann, D. E. (1994). The reading-science learning-writing connection: Breakthroughs, barriers and promises. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 877–893. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, K. G., & Brown, J. (2016). Examining the effectiveness of an academic language planning organizer as a tool for planning science academic instruction and supports. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(8), 847–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9491-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. (2000). History and philosophy of science through models: Some challenges in the case of ‘the atom’. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 993–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900416875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keys, C. W. (1999). Revitalizing instruction on scientific genres: Connecting knowledge production with writing to learn science. Science Education, 83(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199903)83:2<115::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovac, J., & Sherwood, D. W. (1999). Writing in chemistry: An effective learning tool. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(10), 1399–1403. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p1343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Maaerten-Rivera, J., Buxton, C., Penfield, R., & Secada, W. G. (2009). Urban elementary teachers’ perspectives on teaching science to English language learners. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(3), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9133-z
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Limpo, T., & Alves, R. A. (2013). Teaching planning or sentence-combining strategies: Effective SRSD interventions at different levels of written composition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Love, K. (2009). Literacy pedagogical content knowledge in secondary teacher education: Reflecting on oral language and learning across the disciplines. Language and Education, 23(6), 541–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780902822942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markic, S. (2015). Chemistry teachers’ attitudes and needs when dealing with linguistic heterogeneity in the classroom. In M. Kahveci, & M. Ogil (Eds.), Affective dimensions in chemistry education (pp. 279–296). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Markic, S., Broggy, J., & Childs, P. (2013). How to deal with linguistic issues in chemistry classes. In I. Eilks, & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Teaching chemistry – A studybook (pp. 127–152). Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Maskill, R. (1988). Logical language, natural strategies and the teaching of science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(5), 485–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meskill, C., & Oliveira, A. W. (2019). Meeting the challenges of English learners by pairing science and language educators. Research in Science Education, 49(4), 1025–1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9837-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. (1995). Talking about science: An interpretation of the effects of teacher talk in a high school science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 349–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monk, M., & Osborne, J. (1997). Placing the history and philosophy of science on the curriculum: A model for development of pedagogy. Science Education, 81(4), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199707)81:4<405::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, A., Zotos, E., Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S., Gere, A. R., & Shultz, G. (2018). Investigation of the role of writing-to-learn in promoting student understanding of light-matter interactions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(3), 807–818. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00090E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, P. E., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niaz, M. (1998). From cathode rays to alpha particles to quantum of action: A rational reconstruction of structure of the atom and its implications for chemistry textbooks. Science Education, 82(5), 527–552. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199809)82:5<527::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niaz, M. (2016). Chemistry education and contributions from History and Philosophy of Science. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ødegaard, M., Hang, B., Mork, S. M., & Sørvik, G. O. (2014). Challenges and support when teaching science through an integrated inquiry and literacy approach. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 2997–3019. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.942719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver-Hoyo, M. T. (2003). Designing written assignment to promote the use of critical thinking skills in an introductory chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(8), 899–903. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed080p899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2002). Science without literacy: A ship without a sail? Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640220147559
   Google Scholar
• Oyoo, S. O. (2012). Language in science classrooms: An analysis of physics teachers’ use of and beliefs about language. Research in Science Education, 42(5), 849–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9228-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyoo, S. O. (2017). Learner outcomes in South Africa: Role of the nature of learner difficulties with the language for learning and teaching science. Research in Science Education, 47(4), 783–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9528-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyoo, S. O., & Nkopodi, N. (2020). Towards policy on teacher use of language during science teaching and learning in South Africa. Social Dynamis, 46(3), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533952.2020.1853955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawan, J., & Ortloff, F. (2011). English-as-a-second-language, and content-area teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 463–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., Knight, A. M., Cannady, M. A., Henderson, J. B., & McNeill, K. L. (2015). Assessment at the intersection of science and literacy. Theory into Practice, 54(3), 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2015.1044372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., Moje, E., & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science, 328(5977), 459–463. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prain, V. (2006). Learning from writing in secondary science: Some theoretical and practical implications. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500336643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putra, G. B. S., & Tang, K.-S. (2016). Disciplinary literacy instructions on writing scientific explanations: A case study from chemistry classroom in an all-girl school. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(3), 569–579. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00022C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quílez, J. (2016a). El lenguaje de la ciencia como obstáculo de aprendizaje de los conocimientos científicos y propuestas para superarlo [The language of science as an obstacle to learning scientific knowledge and proposals to overcome it]. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educaçao em Ciências, 16(2), 449–476. https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rbpec/article/view/4383
   Google Scholar
• Quílez, J. (2016b). ¿Es el profesor de Química también profesor de Lengua? [Is the chemistry teacher also a language teacher?]. Educación Química, 27(2), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eq.2015.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Quílez, J. (2019). A categorisation of the terminological sources of student difficulties when learning chemistry. Studies in Science Education, 55(2), 121–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2019.1694792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. A., Thaiss, C., Katkin, W., & Thompson, R. J. (2012). Writing-to-learn in undergraduate science education: A community-based, conceptually driven approach. CBE-Life Science Education, 11(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-08-0064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivard, L. P. (1994). A review of writing to learn in science: Implications for practice and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 969–983. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivard, L. P., & Straw, S. B. (2000). The effect of talking and writing on learning science: An exploratory study. Science Education, 84(5), 566–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200009)84:5<566::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Román, D. X., Briceño, A., Rohde, H., & Hironaka, S. (2016). Linguistic cohesion in middle-school texts: A comparison of logical connectives usage in science and social studies textbooks. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Rusek, M., & Vojíř, K. (2019). Analysis of text difficulty in lower-secondary chemistry textbooks. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00141C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., & Walker, J. P. (2012). Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help undergraduate students write to learn by learning to write chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1443–1485. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.667581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sardà, A., & Sanmartí, N. (2000). Enseñar a argumentar científicamente: un reto en las clases de ciencias [Teaching to argue scientifically: A challenge in science classes]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 18(3), 405–422. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/Ensenanza/article/view/21690
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling. A functional linguistics perspective. LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, D. J. (2017). How to integrate content and language learning effectively for English language learners. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7b), 4237–4260. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00806a
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Krauter, K., & Knight, J. K. (2011). Combining peer discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from in-class concept questions. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-08-0101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staples, R., & Heselden, R. (2001). Science teaching and literacy, part 1: Writing. School Science Review, 83(303), 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Stephen, R., Tomas, L., & Tones, M. (2011). Writing stories to enhance scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 33(5), 685–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500691003728039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, A. F., Williams, A. L., Lofgreen, J. E., Edgar, L. J. G., Hoch, L. B., & Dicks, A. P. (2016). Chemistry writing instruction and training: Implementing a comprehensive approach to improving student communication skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(1), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, R. P. (2010). “Hello, I’m carbon.” Writing about elements and compounds. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(11), 1163–1165. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed1000069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, M. (2011). Mathematics and science teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding the teaching of language in content learning. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811401153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thonney, T. (2016). Analyzing the vocabulary demands of introductory college textbooks. The American Biology Teacher, 78(5), 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2016.78.5.389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tretter, T., Ardasheva, Y., & Bookstrom, E. (2014). A brick and a mortar approach. Scaffolding use of specific science language structures for first-year language learners. The Science Teacher, 81(4), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/tst14_081_04_39
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wetzel, M., Zufferey, S., & Gygax, P. (2020). Second language acquisition and the mastery of discourse connectives: Assessing the factors that hinder L2-learners from mastering French connectives. Languages, 5(3), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages5030035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yore, L. D., Hand, B. M., Goldman, S. R., Hildebrand, G. M., Osborne, J. F., Treagust, D. F., & Wallace, C. S. (2004). New directions in language and science education research. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(3), 347–352. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4151776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zufferey, S., & Degand, L. (2017). Annotating the meaning of discourse connectives in multilingual corpora. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 13(2), 399–422. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2013-0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwiers, J. (2014). Building Academic Language: Meeting Common Core Standards Across Disciplines, Grades 5-12. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar