Students’ perceptions of the nature of technology and its relationship with science following an integrated curriculum

References

• Almutairi, A., Everatt, J., Snape, P., & Fox-Turnbull, W. H. (2014). Exploring the relationship between science and technology in the curriculum. Australasian Journal of Technology Education, 1, 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• Ankiewicz, P. (2015). Inheemse en Westerse tegnologiese kennisstelsels: Twee kante van dieselfde muntstuk? Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif Vir Natuurwetenskap En Tegnologie, 34(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4102/satnt.v34i1.1309
   Google Scholar
• Ankiewicz, P. (2019a). Perceptions and attitudes of students towards technology: In search of a rigorous theoretical framework. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9434-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankiewicz, P. (2019b). Alignment of the traditional approach to perceptions and attitudes with Mitcham’s philosophical framework of technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(2), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9443-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, F., & Barlex, D. (2014). Teaching STEM in the Secondary School: Helping teachers meet the challenge. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bayat, A., Louw, W., & Rena, R. (2014). The impact of socio-economic factors on the performance of selected high school students in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Journal of Human Ecology, 45(3), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2014.11906692
   Google Scholar
• Bouras, A., & Albe, V. (2008). Viewpoints of higher education teachers about technologies. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18(3), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-007-9027-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Clough, M. P., Olson, J. K., & Niederhauser, D. S. (2013). Introduction. In M. P. Clough, J. K. Olson, & D. S. Niederhauser (Eds.), The nature of technology: Implications for learning and teaching (pp. 1–4). Brill | Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, V. J. (2004). The relationship between science and technology: Discussion document prepared for the New Zealand Ministry of Education Curriculum Project. https://www.academia.edu/6786310/The_Relationship_between_Science_and_Technology_Discussion_Document_prepared_for_the_New_Zealand_Ministry_of_Education_Curriculum_Project
   Google Scholar
• Constantinou, C., Hadjilouca, R., & Papadouris, N. (2010). Students’ epistemological awareness concerning the distinction between science and technology. International Journal of Science Education, 32(2), 143–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903229296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, C., Magana, A. J., & Vieira, C. M. (2018). Investigating the affordances of a CAD enabled learning environment for promoting integrated STEM learning. Computers & Education, 129, 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, D. (1997). The relationship between science and technology in the primary curriculum - alternative perspectives. The Journal of Design and Technology Education, 2(2), 101–111. https://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/JDTE/article/view/462
   Google Scholar
• DBE. (2012a). Curriculum and assessment policy statement. Intermediate phase: Natural sciences and technology. South African Department of Basic Education.
   Google Scholar
• DBE. (2012b). Curriculum and assessment policy statement. Senior phase: Technology. South African Department of Basic Education.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, M. J. (2016). Teaching about technology. An introduction to the philosophy of technology for non-philosophers. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, M. J. (2018). Philosophy of technology: Themes and topics. In M. J. De Vries (Ed.), Handbook of technology education (pp. 7–16). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, M. J. (2019). Technology education in the context of STEM Education. In A. F. Koch, K. Kruse, & P. Labudde (Eds.), Zur Bedeutung der Technischen Bildung in Fächerverbünden (pp. 43–52). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• DiGironimo, N. (2011). What is technology? Investigating student conceptions about the nature of technology. International Journal of Science Education, 33(10), 1337–1352. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.495400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firat, M. (2017). Growing misconception of technology: Investigation of elementary students’ recognition of and reasoning about technological artifacts. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9351-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. L. (1994). The relationship between technology and science: Some historical and philosphical reflections. Part 1. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 4(2), 123–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204544
   Google Scholar
• Gil-Pérez, D., Vilches, A., Fernández, I., Cachapuz, A., Praia, J., Valdés, P., & Salinas, J. (2005). Technology as ‘applied science’: A serious misconception that reinforces distorted and impoverished views of science. Science & Education, 14(3–5), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-7935-0
   Google Scholar
• Hadjilouca, R., & Constantinou, C. (2019). Teaching aspects of the interrelationship between science and technology: A research report on the design, enactment and evaluation of a teaching proposal. Research in Science & Technological Education, 37(4), 446–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1554560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. L. (2006). Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach. Thomson Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, T., & Rennie, L. (1996). Understanding technology: The development of a concept. International Journal of Science Education, 18(8), 977–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A., & Carr, M. (1992). Teachers’ perceptions of Technology Education: Implications for curriculum innovation. Research in Science Education, 22(1), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356900
   Google Scholar
• Keirl, S. (2018). Mitcham’s fourth: A case for foregrounding volition when framing Design and Technology education. In N. Seery, J. Buckley, D. Canty, & J. Phelan (Eds.), Proceedings of 36th International students’ attitudes towards technology conference (pp. 59–64). Athlone Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, C. P., Cunningham, C. M., & Oh, Y. (2019). What is technology? Development and evaluation of a simple instrument for measuring children’s conceptions of technology. International Journal of Science Education, 41(2), 188–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1545101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T., Barlex, D., & Chapman, C. (2007). Investigating interaction between Science and Design & Technology (D&T) in the Secondary School. A case study approach. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140601053443
   Google Scholar
• Liou, P. Y. (2015). Developing an instrument for assessing students’ concepts of the nature of technology. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33(2), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2014.996542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology. The Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nia, M., & De Vries, M. J. (2016). The New Zealand curriculum’s approach to technological literacy through the lens of the philosophy of technology. Australasian Journal of Technology Education, 3(1), https://doi.org/10.15663/ajte.v3i1.38
   Google Scholar
• Pleasants, J., Clough, M. P., Olson, J. K., & Miller, G. (2019). Fundamental issues regarding the nature of technology. Science & Education, 28(3–5), 561–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00056-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raat, J. H., & de Vries, M. J. (1985). What do 13-year old students think about technology? The conception of and the attitude towards technology of 13-year old girls and boys. Eindhoven University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Radder, H. (2009). Science, technology and the science-technology relationship. In A. Meijers (Ed.), Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences (pp. 65–92). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, L., & Jarvis, T. (1995). English and Australian children’s perceptions about technology. Research in Science & Technological Education, 13(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514950130104
   Google Scholar
• Rocha Fernandes, G. W., Rodrigues, A. M., & Ferreira, C. A. (2018). Conceptions of the nature of science and technology: A study with children and youths in a non-formal science and technology Education setting. Research in Science Education, 48(5), 1071–1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9599-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, L. C., & Dugger, W. E. (2002). ITEA/Gallup poll reveals what Americans think about technology: A report of the survey conducted by the Gallup organisation for the international Technology Education association. The Technology Teacher, 61(6), 1–8. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ642549
   Google Scholar
• Rücker, M. T., & Pinkwart, N. (2018). The things that belong: A grounded theory study of student categorisations of complex technical artifacts. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(3), 701–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9419-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students’ preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education, 76(6), 559–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherz, Z., & Oren, M. (2006). How to change students’ images of science and technology. Science Education, 90(6), 965–985. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidawi, M. M. (2009). Teaching science through designing technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(3), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-007-9045-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svenningsson, J. (2019). Carl Mitcham: Descriptions of technology. In J. Dakers, J. Hallström, & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), Reflections on technology for educational practitioners (pp. 13–24). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Svenningsson, J. (2020). The Mitcham score: Quantifying students’ descriptions of technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(5), 995–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09530-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tala, S. (2013). The nature of technoscience (NOTS). In M. P. Clough, J. K. Olson, & D. S. Niederhauser (Eds.), The nature of technology: Implications for Learning and teaching (pp. 51–84). Sense Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Waight, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Nature of technology: Implications for design, development, and enactment of technological tools in school science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 34(18), 2875–2905. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.698763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. J. (2011). STEM education: Proceed with caution. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 16(1), 26–35. https://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/DATE/article/view/1590
   Google Scholar
• Wolters, F. de K. (1989). A PATT study among 10 to 12-year-Old students in the Netherlands. Journal of Technology Education, 1(1), https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v1i1.a.4
   Google Scholar
• Yalvac, B., Tekkaya, C., Cakiroglu, J., & Kahyaoglu, E. (2007). Turkish Pre-service science Teachers’ views on Science–Technology–Society issues. International Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600708667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar