379
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Teaching Korean science for Indonesian middle school students: promoting Indonesian students’ attitude towards science through the global science exchange programme

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1837-1859 | Received 31 Mar 2020, Accepted 30 May 2021, Published online: 10 Jun 2021

References

  • Adams, D. D., & Shrum, J. W. (1990). The effects of microcomputer-based laboratory exercises on the acquisition of line graph construction and interpretation skills by high school biology students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(8), 777–787. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270807
  • Aini, R. Q., Rachmatullah, A., & Ha, M. (2019). Indonesian primary school and middle school students' attitude toward science: Focus on gender and academic level. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(5), 654–667. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.654
  • Ajzen, I. (2015). The theory of planned behaviour is alive and well, and not ready to retire: A commentary on Sniehotta, Presseau, and Araújo-Soares. Health Psychology Review, 9(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2014.883474
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice Hall.
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Akar, H. (2010). Globalization and its challenges for developing countries: The case of Turkish higher education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(3), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-010-9086-0
  • Aktamiş, H., Hiğde, E., & Özden, B. (2016). Effects of the inquiry-based learning method on students’ achievement, science process skills and attitudes towards science: A meta-analysis science. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(4), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10183a
  • Atar, H. Y. (2002). Chemistry students’ challenges in using MBL’s in science laboratories. Proceedings of association for the education of teachers in science, Charlotte, NT.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
  • Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606
  • Becker, B. J. (1989). Gender and science achievement: A reanalysis of studies from two metaanalyses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(2), 141–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660260206
  • Bernhard, J. (2003). Physics learning and microcomputer based laboratory (MBL) learning: Effects of using MBL as a technological and as a cognitive tool. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, E. Hatzikraniotis, G. Fassoulopoulos, & M. Kallery (Eds.), Science education research in the knowledge based society (pp. 313–321). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Bond, T., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Routledge.
  • Britner, S. L. (2008). Motivation in high school science students: A comparison of gender differences in life, physical, and earth science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 955–970. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20249
  • Burnham, J. A. J. (2019). Developing student expertise in scientific inquiry. In M. K. Seery, & M. Donnell (Eds.), Teaching chemistry in higher education: A festschrift in Honour of Professor Tine Overton (pp. 391–404). Dublin: Creathach Press.
  • Chiu, M. H., & Duit, R. (2011). Globalization: Science education from an international perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 553–566. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20427
  • Choi, S. B. (2008). The effects of MBL-used instruction on scientific inquiry skill and graph construction and interpreting abilities of middle school students. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 29(6), 487–494. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2008.29.6.487
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  • Crawley, F. E., & Black, C. B. (1992). Causal modeling of secondary science students’ intentions to enroll in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 585–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290607
  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Desy, E. A., Peterson, S. A., & Brockman, V. (2011). Gender differences in science-related attitudes and interests among middle school and high school students. Science Educator, 20(2), 23–30.
  • Ferry, T. R., Fouad, N. A., & Smith, P. L. (2000). The role of family context in a social cognitive model for career-related choice behavior: A math and science perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57(3), 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1999.1743
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis.
  • Fisher, W. P. Jr (2007). Rasch measurement transaction. Transaction of the Rasch Measurement SIG American Educational Research Association, 21(1), 1095.
  • Fraley, C., & Raftery, A. E. (2002). Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(458), 611–631. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214502760047131
  • French, D. C., Rianasari, M., Pidada, S., Nelwan, P., & Buhrmester, D. (2001). Social support of Indonesian and US children and adolescents by family members and friends. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47(3), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2001.0015
  • Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitudes to science: A review. Studies in Science Education, 2(1975), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267508559818
  • Gibson, H. L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students’ attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86(5), 693–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10039
  • Hampden-Thompson, G., & Bennett, J. (2013). Science teaching and learning activities and students’ engagement in science. International Journal of Science Education, 35(8), 1325–1343. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.608093
  • Haste, H. (2004). Science in my future: A study of values and beliefs in relation to science and technology amongst 11-21 year olds. Nestlé Social Research Programme.
  • Heo, E. Y., & Yoo, P. K. (2010). The study on the influence of MBL exhibition class on the eelementary school students’ academic achievement, scientific research abilities and affective characters. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 3(1), 36–46.
  • Hillman, S. J., Zeeman, S. I., Tilburg, C. E., & List, H. E. (2016). My Attitudes Toward Science (MATS): The development of a multidimensional instrument measuring students’ science attitudes. Learning Environments Research, 19(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9205-x
  • Hofstede, G. (1993). Cultural constraints in management theories. Academy of Management Perspectives, 7(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1993.9409142061
  • Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Hong, M., & Kang, N. H. (2010). South Korean and the US secondary school science teachers’ conceptions of creativity and teaching for creativity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(5), 821–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9188-5
  • Jo, M. H., & Kim, J. H. (2010). The effects of MBL on the middle school students’ graphing skill and science process skill in Earth Science class. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 31(6), 637–646. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2010.31.6.637
  • Jung, E., Cha, J., & Kim, I. (2016). Analysis of MBL experiments from the Korean secondary science and chemistry textbooks based on 2007 and 2009 revision. Journal of Science Education, 40(3), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2016.40.3.254
  • Kang, N. H. (2019). A review of the effect of integrated STEM or STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) education in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(6), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0034-y
  • KFASC. (2008). Survey of public understanding of science in Korea. Korea Foundation for Advancement of Science and Creativity.
  • Khishfe, R., & BouJaoude, S. (2016). Lebanese students’ conceptions of and attitudes towards science and related careers based on their gender and religious affiliations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9587-0
  • Kirschner, P. A. (1992). Epistemology, practical work and academic skills in science education. Science and Education, 1(3), 273–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00430277
  • Knapp, M. S. (1997). Between systemic reforms and the mathematics and science classroom: The dynamics of innovation, implementation, and professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(2), 227–266. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067002227
  • Kwon, M., & Park, J. (2020). Critical review of ‘skills’ in the 2015 revised science national curriculum. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 40(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2020.40.2.151
  • Lavonen, J., Juuti, K., & Meisalo, V. (2003). Designing a user-friendly microcomputer-based laboratory package through the factor analysis of teacher evaluations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(12), 1471–1487. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000072755
  • Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.004
  • MEST. (2011). Science curriculum. Notification No. 2011-361 of the MEST. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Neumann, I., Neumann, K., & Nehm, R. (2011). Evaluating instrument quality in science education: Rasch-based analyses of a nature of science test. International Journal of Science Education, 33(10), 1373–1405. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.511297
  • OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Ready to learn: Students’ engagement, drive and self-beliefs. PISA, OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2014). Lessons from PISA for Korea, strong performers and successful reformers in education. PISA, OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results: Excellence and equity in education. PISA, OECD Publishing.
  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
  • Owen, S. V., Toepperwein, M. A., Marshall, C. E., Lichtenstein, M. J., Blalock, C. L., Liu, Y., Pruski, L. A., & Grimes, K. (2008). Finding pearls: Psychometric reevaluation of the Simpson–Troost Attitude Questionnaire (STAQ). Science Education, 92(6), 1076–1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20296
  • Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: A systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.881626
  • Rachmatullah, A., Roshayanti, F., Shin, S., Lee, J. K., & Ha, M. (2018). The secondary-student science learning motivation in Korea and Indonesia, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 3123–3141. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91665
  • Riany, Y. E., Cuskelly, M., & Meredith, P. (2016). Cultural beliefs about autism in Indonesia. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 63(6), 623–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2016.1142069
  • Robitzsch, A., Kiefer, T., & Wu, M. (2018). TAM: Test analysis modules. R package version, 2.12-18. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=TAM
  • Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
  • Sangkala, N. R., & Doorman, L. M. (2019). The influence of inquiry-based learning on Indonesian students’ attitude towards science. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032123.
  • Scrucca, L., Fop, M., Murphy, T. B., & Raftery, A. E. (2016). Mclust 5: Clustering, classification and density estimation using Gaussian finite mixture models. The R Journal, 8(1), 289–317. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2016-021
  • Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2005). How do learners in different cultures relate to science and technology? Results and perspectives from the project ROSE (the Relevance of Science Education). Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Hongkong, 6(2), 1–17.
  • Spring, J. (2008). Research on globalization and education. Review of Educational Research, 78(2), 330–363. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308317846
  • Summers, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2018). Development and validation of an instrument to assess student attitudes toward science across grades 5 through 10. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 172–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21416
  • Summers, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2019). An exploration of Illinois students’ attitudes toward science using multivariate multilevel modeling with a cross-sectional sample of responses from grades 5 through 10. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(8), 1106–1134. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21552
  • Suwono, H., Fachrunnisa, R., Yuenyong, C., & Hapsari, L. (2019). Indonesian students’ attitude and interest in stem: An outlook on the gender stereotypes in the STEM field. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012079.
  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage.
  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Sage.
  • Tortosa, M. (2012). The use of microcomputer based laboratories in chemistry secondary education: Present state of the art and ideas for research-based practice. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(3), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP00019A
  • van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., & Walma van der Molen, J. H. (2015). Improving primary teachers’ attitudes toward science by attitude-focused professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(5), 710–734. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21218
  • van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., Walma van der Molen, J. H., & Asma, L. J. (2012). Primary teachers’ attitudes toward science: A new theoretical framework. Science Education, 96(1), 158–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20467
  • Veloo, A., Perumal, S., & Vikneswary, R. (2013). Inquiry-based instruction, students’ attitudes and teachers’ support towards science achievement in rural primary schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.153
  • Wardhana, I. W. (2016). Political economic determinants of growth acceleration: A Korea-Indonesia comparative study. Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan, 20(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.31685/kek.v20i1.182
  • Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320407
  • Widjaja, Y. B., & Heck, A. (2003). How a realistic mathematics education approach and microcomputer-based laboratory worked in lessons on graphing at an Indonesian junior high school. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 26(2), 1–51.
  • Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9052-y
  • World Bank. (2006). Indonesia—country gender assessment.
  • Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.
  • Wu, X., & Geo-JaJa, M. A. (2016). From right to education to rights in education. In M. A. Geo-JaJa, & S. Majhanovich (Eds.), Effects of globalization on education systems and development. The world council of comparative education societies (pp. 3–21). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Wyss, V. L., Heulskamp, D., & Siebert, C. J. (2012). Increasing middle school student interest in STEM careers with videos of scientists. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 7(4), 501–522.
  • Yulianti, K., Denessen, E., Droop, M., & Veerman, G. J. (2019). Transformational leadership for parental involvement: How teachers perceive the school leadership practices to promote parental involvement in children’s education. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 20(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2019.1668424
  • Zeyer, A. (2018). Gender, complexity, and science for all: Systemizing and its impact on motivation to learn science for different science subjects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21413

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.