References
- Callingham, R., & Watson, J. (2011). Measuring levels of statistical pedagogical content knowledge. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics-challenges for teaching and teacher education (pp. 283–293). Springer.
- Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009
- Danish, J. A., & Enyedy, N. (2007). Negotiated representational mediators: How young children decide what to include in their science representations. Science Education, 91(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20166
- Danish, J. A., & Phelps, D. (2011). Representational Practices by the Numbers: How kindergarten and first-grade students create, evaluate, and modify their science representations. International Journal of Science Education, 33(15), 2069–2094.
- Danish, J., Stiso, C., Nicholas, C., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Rogers, M. P., & Francis, D. C. (2020). What, how, and why do elementary teachers think about using representations in their science teaching? Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 2020, 1934–1941.
- diSessa, A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 293–331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2203_2
- Doig, B., Williams, J., Swanson, D., Borromeo Ferri, R., & Drake, P. (Eds.). (2019). Interdisciplinary mathematics education: The state of the art and beyond. Springer ICME series. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-11066-6
- English, L. D. (2012). Data modeling with first-grade students. Educational Studies in Mathematics Education, 81(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9377-3
- English, L. D., & Mulligan, J. T. (Eds.). (2013). Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning. Springer.
- Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.
- Hubber, P., Tytler, R., & Haslam, F. (2010). Teaching and learning about force with a representational focus: Pedagogy and teacher change. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9154-9
- Latour, B. (1990). Drawing things together. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 19–68). MIT Press.
- Lee, T. D., & Jones, M. G. (2018). Elementary teachers’ selection and use of visual models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9705-1
- Lehrer, R. (2009). Designing to develop disciplinary dispositions: Modeling natural systems. American Psychologist, 64(8), 759–771. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.64.8.759
- Lehrer, R. (2021). Promoting transdisciplinary epistemic dialogue. In M.-C. Shanahan, B. Kim, K. Koh, P. Preciado-Babb, & M. A. Takeuchi (Eds.), The learning sciences in conversation: Theories, methodologies, and boundary spaces. Routledge.
- Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2012). Seeding evolutionary thinking by engaging children in modeling its foundations. Science Education, 96(4), 701–724. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20475
- Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2020). Stepping carefully: Thinking through the potential pitfalls of integrated STEM. Journal for STEM Education Research, 4, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00042-y
- Lemke, J. L. (2003). Mathematics in the middle: Measure, picture, gesture, sign, and word. In M. Anderson, A. Sàenz-Ludlow, S. Zellweger, & V. V. Cifarelli (Eds.), Educational perspectives on mathematics as semiosis: From thinking to interpreting to knowing (pp. 215–234). Legas Publishing.
- Maass, K., Geiger, V., Romero Ariza, M., & Goos, M. (2019). The role of mathematics in interdisciplinary STEM education. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 51(6), 869–884. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01100-5
- Mulligan, J. T. (2015). Moving beyond basic numeracy: Data modeling in the early years of schooling. ZDM- International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(4), 653–663. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0687-2
- Mulligan, J., English, L., Mitchelmore, M., & Crevensten, N. (2013). Reconceptualising early mathematics learning: The fundamental role of pattern and structure. In L. English & J. Mulligan (Eds.), Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning (pp. 47–66). Springer.
- Office of the Chief Scientist. (2014). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Australia’s future. https://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/STEM_AustraliasFuture_Sept2014_Web.pdf
- Peirce, C. S. (1931/58). Collected papers of Charles Sanders peirce. 8 Volumes (Eds. Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss & Arthur W Burks, Vols 1-6), (Ed., Arthur W. Burks, Vols 7–8). Harvard University Press.
- Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. University of Chicago Press.
- Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2012). Learning through constructing representations in science: A framework of representational construction affordances. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2751–2773. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.626462
- Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2006). An exploratory study of teachers’and students’use of multi-modal representations of concepts in primary science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1843–1866. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600718294
- Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605–631. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20131
- Tytler, R., Mulligan, J., White, P., & Kirk, M. (in press). Promoting effective interactions between mathematics and science: Challenges of learning through interdisciplinarity. In Y. Li, Z. Zeng, & N. Song (Eds.), Changes and innovations in disciplinary and interdisciplinary education in STEM: An international perspective. Springer.
- Tytler, R., Prain, V., & Hobbs, L. (2019). Rethinking disciplinary links in interdisciplinary STEM learning: A temporal model. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09872-2
- Tytler, R., Prain, V., Hubber, P., & Waldrip, B. (Eds.). (2013). Constructing representations to learn in science. Sense Publishers.
- Tytler, R., White, P., & Mulligan, J. (2021). Visualisation and spatial thinking in primary students’ understandings of astronomy. In O. Levrini, G. Tasquier, T. Amin, L. Branchetti, & M. Levin (Eds.), Engaging with contemporary challenges through science education research: Selected papers from the ESERA 2019 conference. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74490-8
- Vasquez, J. (2015). STEM-beyond the acronym. Educational Leadership, 72(4), 10–15.
- Vygotsky, L. (1981). Thought and language (revised and edited by A. Kozulin). MIT Press.
- Wise, M. N. (2006). Making visible. Isis, 97(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/501101
- Xu, L., Prain, V., & Speldewinde, C. (2021). Challenges in designing and assessing student interdisciplinary learning of optics using a representation construction approach. International Journal of Science Education, 1–24, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1889070