References
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10118
- Abell, S. K. (2000). From professor to colleague: Creating a professional identity as collaborator in elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 548–562. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<548::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-D
- Alake-Tuenter, E., Biemans, H. J. A., Tobi, H., Wals, A. E. J., Oosterheert, I., & Mulder, M. (2012). Inquiry-based science education competencies of primary school teachers: A literature study and critical review of the American National Science Education Standards. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2609–2640. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.669076
- Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26–29. https://eric.ed.gov/
- Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. E. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: Issues related to the science apprenticeship camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 70–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200101)38:1<70::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
- Bartos, S. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2014). Teachers’ knowledge structures for nature of science and scientific inquiry: Conceptions and classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(9), 1150–1184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21168
- Carlone, H. B., & Webb, S. M. (2006). On (not) overcoming our history of hierarchy: Complexities of university/school collaboration. Science Education, 90(3), 544–568. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20123
- Charpak, G. (1996). La Main à la pâte: Les sciences à l'école primaire [La Main à la pâte: Sciences in Elementary School]. Flammarion.
- Chin, C., & Kayalvizhi, G. (2005). What do pupils think of open science investigations? A study of Singaporean primary 6 pupils. Educational Research, 47(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188042000337596
- Cohen-Azria, C., & Coquidé, M. (2016). Recherches sur l’école et ses partenaires scientifiques. Quels partenariats ? Quelles recherches didactiques ? [Researchs on school and its scientific partners. Which partnerships? What educational research?]. RDST. Recherches en didactique des sciences & des technologies, 13, 9–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4000/rdst.1300
- Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Prienta-Konsultit Oy.
- Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43(7), 960–974. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/001401300409143
- Engeström, Y. (2008). Weaving the texture of school change. Journal of Educational Change, 9(4), 379–383. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-008-9086-6
- Gopnik, A. (2012). Scientific thinking in young children: Theoretical advances, empirical research, and policy implications. Science, 337(6102), 1623–1627. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223416
- Herranen, J., & Aksela, M. (2019). Student-question-based inquiry in science education. Studies in Science Education, 55(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2019.1658059
- Houseal, A. K., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Destefano, L. (2014). Impact of a student-teacher-scientist partnership on students’ and teachers’ content knowledge, attitudes toward science, and pedagogical practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 84–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21126
- Ireland, J., Watters, J. J., Brownlee, J. L., Lunn Brownlee, J., & Lupton, M. (2014). Approaches to inquiry teaching: Elementary teacher’s perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1733–1750. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.877618
- Krueger, R. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage publications.
- Léna, J.-Y., Julien, M.-P., Chalmeau, R., Calvet, A., & Vergnolle Mainar, C. (2016). Les ressources en eau dans l’environnement de proximité : Des chercheurs dans la classe [Scientific researchers in the class – to design the evolution of the local territory]. RDST. Recherches en didactique des sciences & des technologies, 13, 133–160. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.4000/rdst.1330
- Léna, P. J. (2001). Science Education in France:“La Main à la Pâte”. Education for the Twenty-First Century, 104.
- Mansour, N. (2015). Science teachers’ views and stereotypes of religion, scientists and scientific research: A call for scientist–science teacher partnerships to promote inquiry-based learning. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11), 1767–1794. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1049575
- MENESR. (2004). Accompagnement en sciences & technologie à l'école primaire (ASTEP). La charte [Coaching elementary teachers in Science & Technology: a chart]. Ministère de l'Éducation nationale, de l'Enseignement supérieur & de la Recherche, Direction de l'enseignement scolaire. http://www.fondation-lamap.org/fr/page/9888/astep-la-charte
- Osborne, J. (2014). Scientific practices and inquiry in the science classroom. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 579–599). Routledge.
- Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
- Peker, D., & Dolan, E. (2012). Helping students make meaning of authentic investigations: Findings from a student–teacher–scientist partnership. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(1), 223–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9385-3
- Pirone, F. (2018). “Les Savanturiers de la sociologie”. De la recherche en “éducation par la recherche” [“Savanturiers of Sociology”: A research on “Education Through Research”]. Diversité, 192.
- Rahm, J., Miller, H. C., Hartley, L., & Moore, J. C. (2003). The value of an emergent notion of authenticity: Examples from two student/teacher-scientist partnership programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(8), 737–756. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10109
- Savanturiers. (2018). Appel à mentors [A call to mentors]. https://www.echosciences-grenoble.fr/annonces/les-Savanturiers-appel-a-mentors-2018
- Schensul, S. L., Schensul, J. J., & LeCompte, M. D. (1999). Essential ethnographic methods. Altamira.
- Trautmann, N. M., & Makinster, J. G. (2005). Teacher/Scientist Partnerships as Professional Development: Understanding How Collaboration Can Lead to Inquiry. Paper presented at International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Colorado Springs, USA.
- van Uum, M. S. J., Verhoeff, R. P., & Peeters, M. (2016). Inquiry-based science education: Towards a pedagogical framework for primary school teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 450–469. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1147660
- Willcuts, H. M. (2009). Scientist-Teacher Partnerships as Professional Development: An Action Research Study. Report Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Pacific Northwest. National Laboratory Richland.
- Zimmerman, G., & Pasquinelli, E. (2017). Esprit Scientifique, Esprit critique [Scientific Thinking, Critical Thinking]. Editions Broché. https://www.fondation-lamap.org/node/20446#livre