Developing museum-school partnerships: art-based exploration of science issues in a third space

References

• Achiam, M. (2016). The role of the imagination in museum visits. Nordic Museology, 2016(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5617/nm.3066.
   Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–1097. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347–370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleazby, J. (2015). Why some school subjects have a higher status than others: The epistemology of the traditional curriculum hierarchy. Oxford Review of Education, 41(5), 671–689. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1090966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2004). The nature of learning science outside the classroom. In M. Braund, & M. Reiss (Eds.), Learning science outside the classroom (pp. 1–12). RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373–1388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500498419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science Among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 50–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colucci-Gray, L., Trowsdale, J., Cooke, C. F., Davies, R., Burnard, P., & Gray, D. S. (2017). Reviewing the potential and challenges of developing STEAM education through creative pedagogies for 21st learning: How can school curricula be broadened towards a more responsive, dynamic, and inclusive form of education? BERA. https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/100-160-BERA-Research-Commission-Report-STEAM-003-1.pdf?noredirect=1
   Google Scholar
• Czerniak, C. M., & Johnson, C. C. (2014). Interdisciplinary science teaching. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 395–411). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1958). Art as experience. Perigree Books. (Original work published 1934).
   Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., & Osborne, J. (2007). Supporting teachers on science-focused school trips: Towards an integrated framework of theory and practice. International Journal of Science Education, 29(6), 685–710. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600802254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2008). A short review of school field trips: Key findings from the past and implications for the future. Visitor Studies, 11(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10645570802355562
   Google Scholar
• Dierdorp, A., Bakker, A., Eijkelhof, H., & van Maanen, J. (2011). Authentic practices as contexts for learning to draw inferences beyond correlated data. Mathematical Thinking and Learning: An International Journal, 13(1-2), 132–151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2011.538294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorion, K. R. (2012). Science through drama: A multiple case exploration of the characteristics of drama activities used in secondary science lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 31(16), 2247–2270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802712699
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377–404). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2012). The museum experience revisited. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fallik, O., Rosenfeld, S., & Eylon, B.-S. (2013). School and out-of-school science: A model for bridging the gap. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.822166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of ‘context’ in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., Bulte, A. M. W., & Pilot, A. (2011). Concept development and transfer in context-based science education. International Journal of Science Education, 33(6), 817–837. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.493185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, J. (2004). Research on students and museums: Looking more closely at the students in school groups. Science Education, 88(S1), S59–S70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-López, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999, January 1). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286–303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039909524733
   Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education: A pedagogical justification and the state-of-the-art in Israel, Germany, and the USA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(6), 1459–1483. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9273-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housen, A. (1980). What is beyond, or before, the lecture tour? A study of aesthetic modes of understanding. Art Education, 33(1), 16–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3192394
   Google Scholar
• Kisiel, J. F. (2010). Exploring a school-aquarium collaboration: An intersection of communities of practice. Science Education, 94(1), 95–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, R., & Eilks, I. (2010). Research-based development of a lesson plan on shower gels and musk fragrances following a socio-critical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(2), 129–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/C005357K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslyk, J. (2016). STEAM makers: Fostering creativity and innovation in the elementary classroom. Sage Publication Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Matterson, C., & Holman, J. (2012). Review of informal science learning: Reflections from the welcome trust. Welcome Trust. https://wellcomecollection.org/works/ee7fgng4
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469–498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B., Kathryn McIntosh, C., Katherine, K., Ellis, L., Rosario, C., & Tehani, C. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, I., & Reiss, M. (2005). The student review of the science curriculum. School Science Review, 87(318), 83–93. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320195039_The_student_review_of_the_science_curriculum
   Google Scholar
• Noam, G. G. (2003). Learning with excitement: Bridging school and after-school worlds and project-based learning. New Directions for Youth Development, 2003(97), 121–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.39
   Google Scholar
• Noam, G. G., & Tillinger, J. R. (2004). After-School as intermediary space: Theory and typology of partnerships. New Directions for Youth Development, 2004(101), 75–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.73
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedretti, E. G. (2004). Perspectives on learning through research on critical issues-based on science center exhibitions. Science Education, 88(S1), S34–S47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, K. J., & Girod, M. (2007). Science, Art, and experience: Constructing a science pedagogy from dewey’s aesthetics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9029-0
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, M. J., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2011). Dioramas as depictions of reality and opportunities for learning in biology. Curator, 54(4), 447–459. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2011.00109.x
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, L., Venville, G., & Wallace, J. (2012). Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Issues, reflections, and ways forward. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, L. J. (2014). Learning science outside of school. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 120–144). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Riksutställningar. (2017). Möten med möjligheter: en rapport om lärares och museers perspektiv på samverkan [Meetings with opportunities: A report on teachers’ and museums’ perspectives on collaboration] [report]. Swedish Exibition Agency. http://raa.diva-portal.org
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463–1488. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600708717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J., Rucker, L., & Beck, J. (2006). Training the clinical eye and mind: Using the arts to develop medical students’ observational and pattern recognition skills. Medical Education, 40(3), 263–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02389.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, S., Naylor, S., Keogh, B., Maloney, J., & Downing, B. (2012). Puppets promoting engagement and talk in science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(9), 1229–1248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701474037
   Google Scholar
• Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE project: An overview and key findings. U. o. Oslo. https://roseproject.no/network/countries/norway/eng/nor-Sjoberg-Schreiner-overview-2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, D. A., & Pilecki, T. (2013). From STEM to STEAM: Using brain-compatible strategies to integrate the arts. Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Stocklmayer, S., Rennie, L., & Gilbert, J. (2010). The roles of the formal and informal sectors in the provision of effective science education. Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903562284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storksdieck, M. (2001). Differences in teachers’ and students’ museum field-trip experiences. Visitor Studies Today, 4(1), 8–12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265190064_Differences_in_teachers'_and_students'_museum_field-trip_experiences
   Google Scholar
• Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.802463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyman, S. M., Waldo, J. T., & Doherty, D. (2016). Methods and models for museum learning at the samuel dorsky museum of Art. Journal for Learning Through the Arts, 12(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21977/D912127457
   Google Scholar
• Xanthoudaki, M. (1998). Is it always worth the trip? The contribution of museum and gallery educational programmes to classroom art education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764980280204
   Google Scholar
• Yenawine, P. (2013). Visual thinking strategies: Using art to deepen learning across school disciplines. Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar