References
- Andrew, S. (1998). Self-efficacy as a predictor of academic performance in science. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27(3), 596–603. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00550.x
- Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). “Balancing acts”: Elementary school girls’ negotiations of femininity, achievement, and science. Science Education, 96(6), 967–989. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21031
- Aschbacher, P. R., Li, E., & Roth, E. J. (2010). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 564–582. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20353
- Aurah, C. M. (2017). Investigating the relationship between science self-efficacy beliefs, gender, and academic achievement, among high school students in Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(8), 146–153.
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
- Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 441–458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5<441::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-3
- Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20131
- Burge, S. W. (2013). Cohort changes in the relationship between adolescents’ family attitudes, stem intentions and attainment. Sociological Perspectives, 56(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2012.56.1.49
- Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
- Cech, E., & Pham, M. (2017). Queer in STEM organizations: Workplace disadvantages for LGBT employees in STEM related federal agencies. Social Sciences, 6(1), 12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6010012
- Cech, E. A., & Waidzunas, T. J. (2011). Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students. Engineering Studies, 3(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2010.545065
- Chemers, M. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Syed, M., Goza, B. K., & Bearman, S. (2011). The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 469–491. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01710.x
- Collins, K. H., & Roberson, J. J. (2020). Developing STEM identity and talent in underrepresented students: Lessons learned from four gifted black males in a magnet school program. Gifted Child Today, 43(4), 218–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217520940767
- Dawson, E., Archer, L., Seakins, A., Godec, S., Dewitt, J., King, H., Mau, A., & Nomikou, E. (2020). Selfies at the science museum: Exploring girls’ identity performances in a science learning space. Gender and Education, 32(5), 664–681. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2018.1557322
- Delaney, J. M., & Devereux, P. J. (2019). Understanding gender differences in STEM: Evidence from college applications. Economics of Education Review, 72, 219–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.06.002
- Fernández-García, C. M., Torío-López, S., García-Pérez, O., & Inda-Caro, M. (2019). Parental support, self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations and interests in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Universitas Psychologica, 18(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy18-2.psse
- Francis, B., Archer, L., Moote, J., de Witt, J., & Yeomans, L. (2017). Femininity, science, and the denigration of the girly girl. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(8), 1097–1110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2016.1253455
- Gallagher, A. M., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Gender differences in mathematics. Cambridge University Press.
- Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1167322
- Gonsalves, A. J., & Danielsson, A. T. (2020). Physics education and gender: Identity as an analytic lens for research. Springer.
- Götschel, H. (2019). Teaching queering physics: An agenda for research and practice. In W. Letts & S. Fifield (Eds.), STEM of desire: Queer theories and science education (pp. 125–145). Brill.
- Gunckel, K. L. (2019). What does queer theory have to do with teaching science in elementary schools? In W. Letts & S. Fifield (Eds.), STEM of desire: Queer theories and science education (pp. 147–159). Brill.
- Günther-Hanssen, A. (2020). A swing and a child: How scientific phenomena can come to matter for preschool children’s emergent science identities. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(4), 885–910. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-09980-w
- Guzey, S. S., & Jung, J. Y. (2021). Productive thinking and science learning in design teams. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 19(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10057-x
- Gwilliam, L. R., & Betz, N. E. (2001, Summer). Validity of measures of math- and science-related self-efficacy for African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Career Assessment, 9(3), 261–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/106907270100900304
- Haley, E. D. (2020, June 15). The Invisible Minority in STEM: Inside Higher Ed. GradHacker. https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/gradhacker/invisible-minority-stem
- Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x
- Hand, S., Rice, L., & Greenlee, E. (2017). Exploring teachers’ and students’ gender role bias and students’ confidence in STEM fields. Social Psychology of Education, 20(4), 929–945. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9408-8
- Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd edition). The Guildford Press.
- Hazari, Z., Sadler, P., & Sonnert, G. (2013). The science identity of college students: Exploring the intersection of gender, race, and ethnicity. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 82–91.
- Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. 2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. American Association of University Women.
- Hoelscher, M. (2019). Why (and How) STEM Curriculum Needs to Be LGBT Inclusive. GLSEN. https://www.glsen.org/blog/why-and-how-stem-curriculum-needs-be-lgbt-inclusive
- Hong, R. C., & Jun, A. (2009). Women's self-efficacy perceptions in mathematics and science: Investigating USC-MESA students. Metropolitan Universities, 22(3), 98–114.
- Hughes, B. E. (2017). “Managing by not managing”: How gay engineering students manage sexual orientation identity. Journal of College Student Development, 58(3), 385–401. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2017.0029
- Hughes, B. E. (2018). Coming out in STEM: Factors affecting retention of sexual minority STEM students. Science Advances, 4(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao6373
- Jordan, K. V., & Carden, R. L. (2017). Self-efficacy and gender in STEM majors. Modern Psychological Studies, 22(2), 60–64.
- Kang, J., Hense, J., Scheersoi, A., & Keinonen, T. (2019). Gender study on the relationships between science interest and future career perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1534021
- Kessels, U. (2005). Fitting into the stereotype: How gender-stereotyped perceptions of prototypic peers relate to liking for school subjects. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(3), 309–323. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173559
- Kessels, U., Heyder, A., Latsch, M., & Hannover, B. (2014). How gender differences in academic engagement relate to students’ gender identity. Educational Research, 56(2), 220–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2014.898916
- Kiran, D., & Sungur, S. (2012). Middle school students’ science self-efficacy and its sources: Examination of gender difference. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(5), 619–630. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9351-y
- Knaier, M. L. (2019). What makes girls and boys so desirable? In W. Letts & S. Fifield (Eds.), STEM of desire: Queer theories and science education (pp. 209–221). Brill.
- Kricorian, K., Seu, M., Lopez, D., Ureta, E., & Equils, O. (2020). Factors influencing participation of underrepresented students in STEM fields: Matched mentors and mindsets. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00219-2
- Langin, K. (2018, March 14). STEM is losing male LGBQ undergrads. Science, https://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2018/03/stem-losing-male-lgbq-undergrads
- Letts, W., & Fifield, S. (2019). STEM of desire: Queer theories and science education. Brill.
- Luzzo, D. A., Hasper, P., Albert, K. A., Bibby, M. A., & Martinelli, E. A., Jr. (1999). Effects of self-efficacy-enhancing interventions on the mathematics/science self-efficacy and career interests, goals, and actions of career undecided college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46(2), 233–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.46.2.233
- Makarova, E., Aeschlimann, B., & Herzog, W. (2019). The gender gap in STEM fields: The impact of the gender stereotype of math and science on secondary students’ career aspirations. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00060
- Marshman, E. M., Kalender, Z. Y., Nokes-Malach, T., Schunn, C., & Singh, C. (2018). Female students with A’s have similar physics self-efficacy as male students with C’s in introductory courses: A cause for alarm? Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020123
- Mattheis, A., Arellano, D. C.-R. D., & Yoder, J. B. (2020). A model of queer STEM identity in the workplace. Journal of Homosexuality, 67(13), 1839–1863. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2019.1610632
- Miller, D. I., Eagly, A. H., & Linn, M. C. (2015). Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 631–644. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000005
- Miller-Friedmann, J. (2020). Elite British female physicists: Social mobility and identity negotiations. In A. Gonsalves & A. Danielsson (Eds.), Physics education and gender: Identity as an analytic lens for research (pp. 153–170). Springer.
- Moote, J., Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & MacLeod, E. (2020). Comparing students’ engineering and science aspirations from age 10 to 16: Investigating the role of gender, ethnicity, cultural capital, and attitudinal factors. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20302
- National Science Teaching Association. (2019, November). Gender Equity in Science Education. National Science Teaching Association. https://www.nsta.org/nstas-official-positions/gender-equity-science-education
- Nissen, J. M. (2019). Gender differences in self-efficacy states in high school physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.013102
- Noack, P., Kracke, B., Gniewosz, B., & Dietrich, J. (2010). Parental and school effects on students’ occupational exploration: A longitudinal and multilevel analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(1), 50–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.02.006
- Ottemo, A., Gonsalves, A., & Danielsson, A. (2021). (Dis)embodied masculinity and the meaning of (non)style in physics and computer engineering education. Gender and Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2021.1884197
- Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs and mathematical problem-solving of gifted students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(4), 325–344. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0025
- Patterson, J. V., & Johnson, A. T. (2017). High school girls’ negotiation of perceived self-efficacy and science course trajectories. Journal of Research in Education, 27(1), 79–113.
- Piatek-Jimenez, K., Cribbs, J., & Gill, N. (2018). College students’ perceptions of gender stereotypes: Making connections to the underrepresentation of women in STEM fields. International Journal of Science Education, 40(12), 1432–1454. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1482027
- Rayburn, A. M. (2009). Differences in females’ math and science self-efficacy based on gender-type socialization and gender role-type. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation and Thesis database (UMI No 1470415).
- Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2019). Investigating gender differences in mathematics and science: Results from the 2011 trends in mathematics and science survey. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 25–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9630-6
- Riegle-Crumb, C., Moore, C., & Ramos-Wada, A. (2011). Who wants to have a career in science or math? Exploring adolescents’ future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity. Science Education, 95(3), 458–476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20431
- Rittmayer, A., & Beier, M. (2009). Overview: Self-efficacy in STEM. Applying Research to Practice Resources, 1–12.
- Romash, Z. M. (2020). Leaving STEM: An examination of the STEM to non-STEM major change and how the STEM curriculum relates to academic achievement in non-STEM fields [ProQuest Information & Learning]. In Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences (Vol. 81, Issue 4–A).
- Rosser, S. (2018). Breaking into the lab: Engineering progress for women in science and technology. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 10(2), 213–232.
- Sahin, A., Waxman, H. C., Demirci, E., & Rangel, V. S. (2020). An investigation of harmony public school students’ college enrollment and STEM major selection rates and perceptions of factors in STEM major selection. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(7), 1249–1269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10017-0
- Scantlebury, K., Danielsson, A. T., Hussenius, A., Gullbery, A., & Andersson, K. (2019). Communicating through silence: Examining the unspoken, the unsaid and the “not done” in science education.”. In K. Scantlebury & C. Milne (Eds.), Material practice and materiality: Too long ignored in science education (pp. 233–244). Springer.
- Schiebinger, L. (2001). Has feminism changed science? Harvard University Press.
- Settles, I. H., O’Connor, R. C., & Yap, S. C. Y. (2016). Climate perceptions and identity interference among undergraduate women in STEM. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(4), 488–503. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316655806
- Seyranian, V., Madva, A., Duong, N., Abramzon, N., Tibbetts, Y., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2018). The longitudinal effects of STEM identity and gender on flourishing and achievement in college physics. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0137-0
- Sinclair, S., Nilsson, A., & Cederskär, E. (2019). Explaining gender-typed educational choice in adolescence: The role of social identity, self-concept, goals, grades, and interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 54–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.11.007
- Smyth, F. L., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). On the gender–science stereotypes held by scientists: Explicit accord with gender-ratios, implicit accord with scientific identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00415
- Sorge, C. (2007). What happens: Relationship of age and gender with science attitudes from elementary to middle school. Science Educator, 16(2), 33–37.
- Souvaine, D. L. (2019, September). The Skilled Technical Workforce: Crafting America’s Science & Engineering Enterprise. https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2019/nsb201923.pdf
- Stout, J. G., & Wright, H. M. (2016). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer students’ sense of belonging in computing: An intersectional approach. Computing in Science & Engineering, 18(3), 24–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2016.45
- Trujillo, G., & Tanner, K. D. (2014). Considering the role of affect in learning: Monitoring students’ self-efficacy, sense of belonging, and science identity. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-12-0241
- Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
- Watts, R. (2014). Females in science: A contradictory concept? Educational Research, 56(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2014.898910
- Williams, M., & George-Jackson, C. E. (2014). Using and doing science: Gender, self-efficacy, and science identity of undergraduate students in STEM. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(2), 99–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014004477
- Yoder, J. B., & Mattheis, A. (2016). Queer in STEM: Workplace experiences reported in a national survey of LGBTQA individuals in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Journal of Homosexuality, 63(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2015.1078632
- Zeldin, A. L., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 215–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001215