Exploring coherence and authorship in pedagogical link-making in science

References

• Aguiar, O. G., Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. (2009). Learning from and responding to students’ questions: The authoritative and dialogic tension. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2), 174–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. (2006). Towards dialogic teaching (3rd ed.). Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Andrée, M. (2005). Ways of using ‘everyday life’ in the science classroom. In K. Boersma, M. Goedhart, O. de Jong, & H. Eijkelhof (Eds.), Research and the quality of science education (pp. 107–116). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, A., & Wagner, D. (2019). Identities available in intertwined discourses: Mathematics student interaction. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51, 529–540.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, M., & Rubin, D. (2006). How contingent questioning promotes extended student talk: A function of display questions. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(2), 141–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3802_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bublitz, W. (2011). Cohesion and coherence. In J.-O. Östman, & J. Veschueren (Eds.), Discursive pragmatics (pp. 37–49). Jon Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Caballero, D., Araya, R., Kronholm, H., Viiri, J., Mansikkaniemi, A., Lehesvuori, S., … Kurimo, M. (2017, September 12–15). ASR in classroom today: Automatic visualization of conceptual network in science classrooms. European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, Springer, Cham, pp. 541–544
   Google Scholar
• Candela, A. (1998). Students’ power in classroom discourse. Linguistics and Education, 10(2), 139–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(99)80107-7
   Google Scholar
• Chase, C. C., Marks, J., Malkiewich, L. J., & Connolly, H. (2019). How teacher talk guidance during invention activities shapes students’ cognitive engagement and transfer. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0170-7
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelius, L. L., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2004). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students’ relationships with each other and with concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 467–498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690Xci2204_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, R. (2002). Supportive teacher talk: The importance of the F-move. ELT Journal, 56(2), 117–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.2.117
   Google Scholar
• Davidse, K., & Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. (2008). Introduction: The realization of interpersonal meaning. Word, 59(1-2), 3–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2008.11432579
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938/1997). Experience & education. Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, H. E., Neumann, K., Labudde, P., & Viiri, J. (eds.). (2014). Quality of instruction in physics: Comparing Finland. Waxmann Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, E. J., Borko, B., Osborne, J., Gomez, F., Rafanelli, S., Reigh, E., Tseng, A., Million, S. & Berson, E. (2017). A practice-based professional development program to support scientific argumentation from evidence in the elementary classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(3), 222–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FNBE. 2014. Finnish national core curriculum for basic education 2014. The Finnish National Board of Education. Helsinki: Valtion painatuskeskus.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, M. J., & Wargo, B. M. (2012). Dialogic framing of scientific content for conceptual and epistemic understanding. Science Education, 96(3), 369–391. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis theory and method. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2010). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in english. Longman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., DeCoster, J., Mashburn, A. J., & Hamagami, A. (2013). Teaching through interactions: Testing a developmental framework of teacher effectiveness in over 4,000 classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 113(4), 461–487. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/669616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, P.-L., Roth, W.-M., & Mazumder, A. (2009). Natural pedagogical conversations in high school students’ internship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(5), 481–505. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, A., Nygård Larsson, P., & Jakobsson, A. (2020). The continuity of learning in a translanguaging science classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09933-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, S., Bringe, R., Aucejo, E., & Fruehwirth, J. (2020). Using global observation protocols to inform research on teaching effectiveness and school improvement: Strengths and emerging limitations. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28, 62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5012
   Google Scholar
• King, D., Ritchie, S., Sandhu, M., & Henderson, S. (2015). Emotionally intense science activities. International Journal of Science Education, 37(12), 1886–1914. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1055850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S., & Miller, S. M. (eds.). (2003). Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumpulainen, K., & Rajala, A. (2017). Dialogic teaching and students’ discursive identity negotiation in the learning of science. Learning and Instruction, 48, 23–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehesvuori, S., Hähkiöniemi, M., Viiri, J., Nieminen, P., Jokiranta, K., & Hiltunen, J. (2019). Teacher orchestration of classroom interaction in science: Exploring dialogic and authoritative passages in whole-class discussions. International Journal of Science Education, 41(17), 2557–2578. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1689586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehesvuori, S., Ramnarain, U., & Viiri, J. (2018). Challenging transmission modes of teaching in science classrooms: Enhancing learner-centredness through dialogicity. Research in Science Education, 48(5), 1049–1069. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9598-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehesvuori, S., Viiri, J., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2011). Introducing dialogic teaching to science student teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(8), 705–727. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9253-0
   Google Scholar
• Lehesvuori, S., Viiri, J., Rasku-Puttonen, H., Moate, J., & Helaakoski, J. (2013). Visualizing communication structures in science classrooms: Tracing cumulativity in teacher-led whole class discussions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(8), 912–939. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Ablex Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Linvill, D. (2014). Student interest and engagement in the classroom: Relationships with student personality and developmental variables. Southern Communication Journal, 79(3), 201–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2014.884156
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 226–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. (1997). Exploring discourse, subjectivity, and knowledge in chemistry class. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32(2), 35–44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23870454
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in science classrooms. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Msimanga, A., Denley, P., & Gumede, N. (2017). The pedagogical role of language in science teaching and learning in South Africa: A review of research 1990–2015. African Journal of Research in mathematics. Science and Technology Education, 21(3), 245–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2017.1367874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 297–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023004297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen, P., Savinainen, A., & Viiri, J. (2012). Relations between representational consistency, conceptual understanding of the force concept, and scientific reasoning. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(1), 010123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010123
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A. W. (2009). Developing elementary teachers’ understandings of hedges and personal pronouns in inquiry-based science classroom discourse. Journal of Research in Science Education, 8(2), 247–269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9157-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Mintz, S. L. (2012). Classroom assessment scoring system: Secondary (CLASS-S). Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel, D. S., & McNeill, K. L. (2013). Conducting talk in secondary science classrooms: Investigating instructional moves and teachers’ beliefs. Science Education, 97(3), 367–394. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renshaw, P., & Brown, R. A. J. (2007). Formats of classroom talk for integrating everyday and scientific discourse: Replacement, interweaving, contextual privileging and pastiche. Language and Education, 21(6), 531–549. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2167/le710.0
   Google Scholar
• Schlotterbeck, D., Araya, R., Caballero, D., Abelino, J., Lehesvuori, S., & Viiri, J. (2020). Assessing teacher’s discourse effect on students’ learning: A keyword centrality approach. In C. Alario-Hoyos, M. J. Rodríguez-Triana, M. Scheffel, I. Arnedillo-Sánchez, & S. M. Dennerlein (Eds.), EC-TEL 2020: Addressing global challenges and quality education, lecture notes in computer science (pp. 102–116). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P. (1998). Teacher talk and meaning making in science classrooms: A Vygotskian analysis and review. Studies in Science Education, 32, 45–80.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P., & Ametller, J. (2007). Teaching science in a meaningful way: Striking a balance between ‘opening up’ and ‘closing down’ classroom talk. School Science Review, 88(324), 77–83.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605–631. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, P., Mortimer, E., & Ametller, J. (2011). Pedagogical link-making: A fundamental aspect of teaching and learning scientific conceptual knowledge. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.549619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sensevy, G., Tiberghien, A., Santini, J., Laubé, S., & Griggs, P. (2008). An epistemological approach to modeling: Cases studies and implications for science teaching. Science Education, 92, 424–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikorski, T. R., & Hammer, D. (2017). Looking for coherence in science curriculum. Science Education, 101(6), 929–943. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staarman, K. J., & Ametller, J. (2019). Pedagogical link-making with digital technology in science classrooms: New perspectives on connected learning. In N. Mercer, R. Wegerif, & L. Major (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education (pp. 497–508). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, K. S. (2017). Analyzing teachers’ use of metadiscourse: The missing element in classroom discourse analysis. Science Education, 101(4), 548–583. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiberghien, A., Buty, C., & Le Marechal, J.-F. (2005). Physics teaching sequences and students’ learning. In D. Koliopoulos, & A. Vavouraki (Eds.), Science and technology education at cross roads: Meeting the challenges of the 21st century: The second conference of EDIFE and the second IOSTE symposium in Southern Europe (pp. 25–55). Association for Science Education (EDIFE).
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675–691. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trauth-Nare, A., Buck, G. A., & Beeman-Cadwallader, N. (2016). Promoting student agency in science inquiry: A self-study of relational pedagogical practices in science teacher education. In G. Buck, & V. Akerson (Eds.), Enhancing professional knowledge of pre-service science teacher education by self-study research (pp. 43–67). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. C. (2007). Teachers’ scientific epistemological views: The coherence with instruction and students’ views. Science Education, 91(2), 222–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viiri, J., & Helaakoski, J. (2014). Content and content structure of Physics lessons and students’ learning gains: Comparing Finland, Germany and Switzerland. In H. E. Fischer, P. Labudde, K. Neumann, & J. Viiri (Eds.), Quality of instruction in physics: Comparing Finland, Germany and Switzerland (pp. 93–110). Waxmann Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, D., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2014). Identifying authority structures in mathematics classroom discourse: A case of a teacher’s early experience in a new context. ZDM, 46(6), 871–882. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0587-x
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Guo, M. (2014). A short analysis of discourse coherence. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), 460–465. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.2.460-465
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic education and technology: Expanding the space of learning. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G., & Arauz, R. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379–428. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar