614
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Using an eye tracker to examine the effect of prior knowledge on reading processes while reading a printed scientific text with multiple representations

ORCID Icon
Pages 1209-1229 | Received 04 Aug 2021, Accepted 26 Apr 2022, Published online: 15 May 2022

References

  • Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
  • Alexander, P. A. (2004). A model of domain learning: Reinterpreting expertise as a multidimensional, multistage process. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 273–298). Erlbaum.
  • Ariasi, N., Hyönä, J., Kaakinen, J. K., & Mason, L. (2017). An eye-movement analysis of the refutation effect in reading science text. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(3), 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12151
  • Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Canty, A., & Ripley, B. D. (2021). boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. R package version 1.3-28.
  • Chaffin, R., Morris, R. K., & Seely, R. E. (2001). Learning new word meanings from context: A study of eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.225
  • Chen, M. L., & Chen, C. H. (2020). Do readers adjust their lower- and higher-level language skills according to text structures? Evidence from eye movements in Chinese text reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(2), 180–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12297
  • Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.004
  • Cook, M., Wiebe, E. N., & Carter, G. (2008). The influence of prior knowledge on viewing and interpreting graphics with macroscopic and molecular representations. Science Education, 92(5), 848–867. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20262
  • Cook, M. P. (2006). Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education, 90(6), 1073–1091. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20164
  • Cromley, J. G., Snyder-Hogan, L. E., & Luciw-Dubas, U. A. (2010). Reading comprehension of scientific text: A domain-specific test of the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 687–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019452
  • Dinsmore, D. L., & Alexander, P. A. (2016). A multidimensional investigation of deep-level and surface-level processing. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84(2), 213–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2014.979126
  • Duke, N. K., Pressley, M., & Hilden, K. (2004). Difficulties with reading comprehension. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy development and disorder (pp. 501–520). Guilford.
  • Eitel, A. (2016). How repeated studying and testing affects multimedia learning: Evidence for adaptation to task demands. Learning and Instruction, 41, 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.10.003
  • Foster, T. E., Ardoin, S. P., & Binder, K. S. (2018). Reliability and validity of eye movement measures of children's reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.182
  • Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2019). An R companion to applied regression (3rd ed.). Sage.
  • Guo, D., McTigue, E. M., Matthews, S. D., & Zimmer, W. (2020). The impact of visual displays on learning across the disciplines: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09523-3
  • Hegarty, M., & Just, M. A. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(6), 717–742. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1036
  • Ho, H. N. J., Tsai, M. J., Wang, C. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2014). Prior knowledge and online inquiry-based science reading: Evidence from eye tracking. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 525–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9489-6
  • Jian, Y. C. (2016). Fourth graders’ cognitive processes and learning strategies for reading illustrated biology texts: Eye movement measurements. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(1), 93–109.
  • Jian, Y. C. (2018). Reading instructions influence cognitive processes of illustrated text reading not subject perception: An eye-tracking study. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2263.
  • Jian, Y. C. (2019). Reading instructions facilitate signaling effect on science text for young readers: An eye-movement study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 503–522.
  • Jian, Y. C. (2020). Teaching fourth-grade students of different reading abilities to read biological illustrations and integrate to text information: An empirical experiment. Research in Science Education, 50(6), 2269–2282.
  • Jian, Y. C., Chen, M. L., & Ko, H. W. (2013). Context effects in processing of Chinese academic words: An eye tracking investigation. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(4), 403–413.
  • Jian, Y. C., & Ko, H. W. (2014). Investigating the effects of background knowledge on Chinese word processing during text reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(1), 71–86.
  • Jian, Y. C, & Ko, H. W. (2017). Influences of text difficulty and reading ability on learning illustrated science texts for children: An eye movement study. Computers and Education, 113, 263–279.
  • Juhasz, B. J., & Rayner, K. (2003). Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation duration in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(6), 1312–1318. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1312
  • Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
  • Kintsch, W. (2005). An overview of top-down and bottom-up effects in comprehension: The CI perspective. Discourse Processes, 39(2), 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651676
  • Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
  • Kohl, P. B., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2008). Patterns of multiple representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 4, 010111-1–010111-13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010111
  • Liao, C.-N., Chang, K.-E., Huang, Y.-C., & Sung, Y.-T. (2020). Electronic storybook design, kindergartners’ visual attention, and print awareness: An eye-tracking investigation. Computers & Education, 144, 103703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103703
  • Liu, C. C. (2009, October). Slow earthquakes triggered by typhoons (in Chinese). Scientific American, 92, 10–115.
  • Mason, L., Tornatora, M. C., & Pluchino, P. (2013). Do fourth graders integrate text and picture in processing and learning from an illustrated science text? Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Computers & Education, 60(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.011
  • Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). Cambridge University Press.
  • McCullough, R. G. (2013). The relationship between reader response and prior knowledge on African American students’ reading comprehension performance using multicultural literature. Reading Psychology, 34(5), 397–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2011.643531
  • McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
  • Miller, B. W. (2015). Using reading times and eye-movements to measure cognitive engagement. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1004068
  • Ozuru, Y., Best, R., Bell, C., Witherspoon, A., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Influence of question format and text availability on the assessment of expository text comprehension. Cognition and Instruction, 25(4), 399–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701632371
  • Pukelsheim, F., & Simeone, B. (2009). On the iterative proportional fitting procedure: Structure of accumulation points and L1-error analysis. Publishing Institution: Universität Augsburg.
  • Rau, M. A. (2018). Sequencing support for sense making and perceptual induction of connections among multiple visual representations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 811–833. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000229
  • Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
  • Renkl, A., & Scheiter, K. (2017). Studying visual displays: How to instructionally support learning. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 599–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9340-4
  • Scheiter, K., & Eitel, A. (2015). Signals foster multimedia learning by supporting integration of highlighted text and diagram elements. Learning and Instruction, 36, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.002
  • Schnotz, W. (2014). Integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 72–103). Cambridge University Press.
  • Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8
  • Schüler, A. (2017). Investigating gaze behavior during processing of inconsistent text-picture information: Evidence for text-picture integration. Learning and Instruction, 49, 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.03.001
  • Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1007–1041. http://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317722961
  • Talwar, A., Tighe, E. L., & Greenberg, D. (2018). Augmenting the simple view of reading for struggling adult readers: A unique role for background knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(5), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1450410
  • Tarchi, C. (2010). Reading comprehension of informative texts in secondary school: A focus on direct and indirect effects of reader's prior knowledge. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 415–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.04.002
  • Tsai, M. J., & Wu, A. H. (2021). Visual search patterns, information selection strategies, and information anxiety for online information problem solving. Computers & Education, 172, 104234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104236
  • Tsai, M. J., Wu, A. H., & Chen, Y. (2019). Static and dynamic seductive illustration effects on text-and-graphic learning processes, perceptions, and outcomes: Evidence from eye tracking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1002/acp.3514
  • Williams, R. S., & Morris, R. K. (2004). Eye movements, word familiarity, and vocabulary acquisition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1/2), 312–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440340000196
  • Wu, C.-J., Liu, C.-Y., Yang, C.-H., & Wu, C.-Y. (2021). Children’s reading performances in illustrated science texts: Comprehension, eye movements, and interpretation of arrow symbols. International Journal of Science Education, 43(1), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1858515
  • Yang, F.-Y., Huang, R.-T., & Tsai, I. J. (2016). The effects of epistemic beliefs in science and gender difference on university students’ science-text reading: An eye-tracking study. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 14(3), 473–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9578-1

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.