511
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Associations between science dispositions and science literacy: a comparison of the United States and Canada

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 1440-1461 | Received 25 Oct 2021, Accepted 18 May 2022, Published online: 27 May 2022

References

  • Alatli, B. K. (2020). Investigation of factors associated with science literacy performance of students by hierarchical linear modeling: PISA 2015 comparison of Turkey and Singapore. Education and Science, 45(202), 17–49. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8188
  • Ammermueller, A., & Piscke, J.-S. (2009). Peer effects in European primary schools: Evidence from the progress in international reading literacy study. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(3), 315–348. https://doi.org/10.1086/603650
  • Anders, J., Has, S., Jerrim, J., Shure, N., & Zieger, L. (2021). Is Canada really an education superpower? The impact of non-participation on results from PISA 2015. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 33(1), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09329-5
  • Areepattamannil, S., & Freeman, J. G. (2008). Academic achievement, academic self-concept, and academic motivation of immigrant adolescents in the greater Toronto area secondary schools. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(4), 700–743. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2008-831
  • Areepattamannil, S., Freeman, J. G., & Klinger, D. A. (2010). Influence of motivation, self-beliefs, and instructional practices on science achievement of adolescents in Canada. Social Psychology of Education, 14(2), 233–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-010-9144-9
  • Areepattamannil, S., & Kaur, B. (2013). Factors predicting science achievement of immigrant and non-immigrant students: A multilevel analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(5), 1183–1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9369-5
  • Barger, M. M., Perez, T., Canelas, D. A., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2018). Constructivism and personal epistemology development in undergraduate chemistry students. Learning and Individual Differences, 63, 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.03.006
  • Barton, A. C., Kang, H., Tan, E., O’Neill, T. B., Bautista-Guerra, J., & Brecklin, C. (2013). Crafting a future in science: Tracing middle school girls’ identity work over time and space. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 237–275. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212458142
  • Beese, J., & Liang, X. (2010). Do resources matter? PISA science achievement comparisons between students in the United States, Canada and Finland. Improving Schools, 13(3), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480210390554
  • Blotnicky, K. A., Franz-Odendaal, T., French, F., & Joy, P. (2018). A study of the correlation between STEM career knowledge, mathematics self-efficacy, career interests, and career activities on the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career among middle school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0118-3
  • Bonnette, R. N., Crowley, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2019). Falling in love and staying in love with science: Ongoing informal science experiences support fascination for all children. International Journal of Science Education, 41(12), 1626–1643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1623431
  • Bottge, B., Ma, X., Gassaway, L., Toland, M. D., Butler, M., & Cho, S.-J. (2014). Effects of blended instructional models on math performance. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 423–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527240
  • Bouchrika, I. (2020). 101 American school statistics: 2020 data, trends & predictions. http://www.guide2research.com/research/american-school-statistics
  • Cardoza, K. (2018). In Canada’s public schools, immigrant students are thriving. Education Week, 37(23), 1–14.
  • Casas-Quiroga, L., & Crujerias-Pérez, B. (2020). Epistemic operations performed by high school students in an argumentation and decision-making context: Setrocia’s alimentary emergency. International Journal of Science Education, 42(16), 2653–2673. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1824300
  • Caymaz, B., & Aydin, A. (2021). The effect of common knowledge construction model-based instruction on 7th grade students’ academic achievement and their views about the nature of science in the electrical energy unit at schools of different socio-economic levels. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(2), 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10054-0
  • Ceylan, E. (2020). Science teachers’ self-efficacy in instruction and self-efficacy in student engagement across Estonia, Japan, and Turkey. Journal of Education and Future, 18, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.751536
  • Chen, H.-J. (2015). Effects of empowerment programs in remote junior high schools on scientific epistemological beliefs, self-regulation strategies, and academic achievement in science. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(4), 21–53. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(4).02
  • Cheung, A., Slavin, R. E., Kim, E., & Lake, C. (2017). Effective secondary science programs: A best-evidence synthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21338
  • Chi, S., Liu, X., Wang, Z., & Han, S. W. (2018). Moderation of the effects of scientific inquiry activities on low SES students’ PISA 2015 science achievement by school teacher support and disciplinary climate in science classroom across gender. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1284–1304. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1476742
  • Chudgar, A., Luschei, T. F., & Zhou, Y. (2013). Science and mathematics achievement and the importance of classroom composition: Multicountry analysis using TIMSS 2007. American Journal of Education, 119(2), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1086/668764
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Corin, E. N., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. M. (2020). The role of dual enrollment STEM coursework in increasing STEM career interest among American high school students. Teachers College Record, 122(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012200210
  • Council of Ministers in Education, Canada. (2020). Over fifty years of pan-Canadian leadership in education. https://www.cmec.ca/299/education-in-canada-an-overview/index.html
  • Covert, H., Tshiswaka, D. I., Ramkissoon, I., Sisskin, E., Lichtveld, M., & Wickliffe, J. (2019). Assessing science motivation among high school students participating in a supplemental science programme: The emerging scholars environmental health sciences academy. International Journal of Science Education, 41(17), 2508–2523. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1689308
  • Dam, M., Ottenhof, K., Van Boxtel, C., & Janssen, F. (2019). Understanding cellular respiration through simulation using Lego® as a concrete dynamic model. Educational Sciences, 9(2), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020072
  • De Witte, K., & Rogge, N. (2016). Problem-based learning in secondary education: Evaluation by an experiment. Education Economics, 24(1), 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2014.966061
  • Durk, J., Davies, A., Hughes, R., & Jardine-Wright, L. (2020). Impact of an active learning physics workshop on secondary school students’ self-efficacy and ability. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 020126. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020126
  • Fung, D., & Lui, W.-M. (2016). Individual to collaborative: Guided group work and the role of teachers in junior secondary science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 38(7), 1057–1076. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1177777
  • Goff, E. E., Mulvey, K. L., Irvin, M. J., & Hartstone-Rose, A. (2020). The effects of prior informal science and math experiences on undergraduate STEM identity. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(3), 272–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1627307
  • Grabau, L. J. (2021). International secondary science education: Associations among science epistemology, science enjoyment, school climate and science achievement. American Educational Research Association Annual meeting, virtual.
  • Grabau, L. J., & Ma, X. (2017). Science engagement and science achievement in the context of science instruction: A multilevel analysis of U.S. Students and Schools. International Journal of Science Education, 39(8), 1045–1068. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1313468
  • Güccük, A., & Köksal, M. S. (2017). The effect of case teaching on meaningful and retentive learning when studying genetic engineering. Journal of Biological Education, 51(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1182049
  • Hester, S. D., Nadler, M., Katcher, J., Elfring, L. K., Dykstra, E., Rezende, L. F., & Bolger, M. S. (2018). Authentic inquiry through modeling in biology (AIM-Bio): An introductory laboratory curriculum that increases undergraduates’ scientific agency and skills. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(ar63), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-06-0090
  • Höft, L., & Bernholt, S. (2019). Longitudinal couplings between interest and conceptual understanding in secondary school chemistry: An activity-based perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 41(5), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1571650
  • Huang, T., Hochbein, C., & Simons, J. (2020). The relationship among school contexts, principle time use, school climate, and student achievement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(2), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218802595
  • Itzek-Greulich, H., & Vollmer, C. (2017). Emotional and motivational outcomes of lab work in the secondary intermediate track: The contribution of a science center outreach lab. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21334
  • Kadir, M. S., Yeung, A. S., Ryan, R. M., Forbes, A., & Diallo, T. M. O. (2020). Effects of a dual-approach instruction on students’ science achievement and motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 571–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9449-3
  • Kang, H., Barton, A. C., Tan, E., Simpkins, S. D., Rhee, H.-Y., & Turner, C. (2019). How do middle school girls of colour develop STEM identities? Middle school girls’ participation in science activities and identification with STEM careers. Science Education, 103(2), 418–439. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21492
  • Koponen, I. T. (2020). Usage of terms “science” and “scientific knowledge” in nature of science (NOS): Do their lexicons in different accounts indicate shared conceptions? Education Sciences, 10(9), 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090252
  • Leo, J., & Puzio, K. (2016). Flipped instruction in a high school science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(5), 775–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9634-4
  • Lin, E., & Shi, Q. (2014). Exploring individual and school-related factors and environmental literacy: Comparing U.S. and Canada using PISA 2006. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9396-2
  • Lin, Y.-L., Huang, S. W., & Chang, C.-C. (2019). The impacts of a marine science board game on motivation, interest, and achievement in marine science learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(6), 907–923. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.907
  • Lytle, A., & Shin, J. E. (2020). Incremental beliefs, STEM efficacy and STEM interest among first-year undergraduate students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(2), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09813-z
  • Ma, X., Fan, M., & Luo, X. (2018). Consistency of science achievement across science subjects among Chinese students and schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 56, 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.12.006
  • Ma, X., Ma, L., & Bradley, K. (2008). Using multilevel modeling to investigate school effects. In A. A. O’Connell, & D. B. McCoach (Eds.), Multilevel modeling of educational data (pp. 59–110). Information Age.
  • Marks, G. N. (2015). Are school-SES effects statistical artefacts? Evidence from longitudinal population data. Oxford Review of Education, 41(1), 122–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1006613
  • Marks, G. N. (2017). Is SES really that important for educational outcomes in Australia? A review and some recent evidence. The Australian Educational Researcher, 44(2), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-016-0219-2
  • McConney, A., & Woods-McConney, A. (2019). Inquiry-based teacher-directed and adaptive instruction in secondary science: A cross-national analysis of associations with science literacy and interest using PISA 2015. Proceedings of ICERI2019 Conference, 6045–6050.
  • Métioui, A., Matoussi, F., & Trudel, L. (2015). The teaching of photosynthesis in secondary school: A history of the science approach. Journal of Biological Education, 50(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2015.1085427.
  • Mustafa, M. I., & Trudel, L. (2013). The impact of cognitive tools on the development of the inquiry skills of high school students in physics. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 4(9), 124–129.
  • National Association of Educational Progress (NAEP). (2020). The nation’s report card. 2019 NAEP report of mathematics and reading at grade 12. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/media.aspx?utm_content=&utm_medium=email&utm_name=&utm_source=govdelivery&utm_term=
  • Nationmaster. (2020). Comparison of educational systems in Canada and the U.S. https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/compare/Canada/United-States/Education
  • OECD. (2007). PISA 2006. Science competencies for tomorrow’s world: Executive summary. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/39725224.pdf
  • OECD. (2009). PISA 2006 technical report. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/42025182.pdf
  • OECD. (2016a). PISA 2015 database. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/2015database/
  • OECD. (2016b). Student questionnaire, PISA 2015. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/CY6_QST_MS_STQ_CBA_Final.pdf
  • OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 technical report. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/2015-technical-report/
  • OECD. (2018). PISA 2015 results in focus. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf
  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). SAGE.
  • Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. (2011). HLM 7 for Windows [Computer software]. Scientific Software International, Inc.
  • Ricento, T. (2013). The consequences of official bilingualism on the status and perception of non-official languages in Canada. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 34(5), 475–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2013.783034
  • Rohatgi, A., & Scherer, R. (2020). Identifying profiles of students’ school climate perceptions using PISA 2015 data. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 8(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-020-00083-0
  • Rowley, K. J., Silveira, F., Dufur, M., & Jarvis, J. A. (2019). U.S. underperformance in an International context. Teachers College Record, 121(100304), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912101004.
  • Schlegel, R. J., Chub, S. L., Chena, K., Deuermeyerc, E., Christy, A. G., & Quek, F. (2019). Making in the classroom: Longitudinal evidence of increases in self-efficacy and STEM possible selves over time. Computers and Education, 142, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103637
  • Scientific Software International (SSI). (2019). HLM 8 for Windows. http://www.ssicentral.com/index.php/product/hlm
  • She, H.-C., Lin, H.-S., & Huang, L.-Y. (2019). Reflections on and implications of the programme for International Student Assessment 2015 (PISA 2015) performance of students in Taiwan: The role of epistemic beliefs about science in science literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(10), 1309–1240. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21553
  • Struyf, A., De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Students’ engagement in different STEM learning environments: Integrated STEM education as a promising learning practice? International Journal of Science Education, 41(10), 1387–1407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1607983
  • Trudel, L., & Métioui, A. (2011). Diagnostic of attitudes towards science held by pre-service science teachers. The International Journal of Science in Society, 2(4), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.18848/1836-6236/CGP/v02i04/51295
  • Turner, C. W., Didsbury, R., & Ingram, M. (2014). The deep river science academy: A unique and innovation program for engaging students in science. AECL Nuclear Review, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.12943/ANR.2014.00031
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2020). Secretary DeVos releases statement on “The Nation's Report Card” results for 12th graders. https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/secretary-devos-releases-statement-nations-report-card-results-12th-graders
  • Vazquez-Alonso, Ȧ, & Manassero Mas, M. A. (2018). The epistemic knowledge of scientific competence in the evaluation PISA 2015. Revista de Educacion, 380(2), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2017-380-374
  • Williams, D. R., Brule, H., Kelley, S. S., & Skinner, E. A. (2018). Science in the learning gardens (SciLG): A study of students’ motivation, achievement, and science identity in low-income middle schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(5), 1–14. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0104-9
  • Willms, J. D. (2010). School composition and contextual effects on student outcomes. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1008–1037. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011200408
  • Yaki, A. A., Saat, R. M., Sathasivam, R. V., & Zulnaidi, H. (2019). Enhancing science achievement utilizing an integrated STEM approach. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 16(1), 181–205. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2019.16.1.8
  • Yang, F.-Y., Liu, S.-Y., Hsu, C.-Y., Chiou, G.-L., Wu, H.-K., Wu, Y.-T., Chen, S., Liang, J.-C., Tsai, M.-J., Lee, S. W.-Y., Lee, M.-H., Lin, C.-L., Chu, R. J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2018). High-school students’ epistemic knowledge of science and its relation to learner factors in science learning. Research in Science Education, 48(2), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9570-6
  • You, H. S., Park, S., & Delgado, C. (2021). A closer look at U.S. schools: What characteristics are associated with scientific literacy? A multivariate multilevel analysis using PISA 2015. Science Education, 105(2), 406–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21609
  • Zhou, H. (2019). A partial simulation study of phantom effects in multilevel analysis of school effects: The case of school socioeconomic composition [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Kentucky.
  • Zhou, Y. (2014). The relationship between school organizational characteristics and reliance on out-of-field teachers in mathematics and science: Cross-national evidence from TALIS 2008. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(3), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0123-8
  • Zuze, T. L., & Juan, A. (2020). School leadership and local learning contexts in South Africa. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(3), 459–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218814006

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.