422
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Scaffolding pre-service biology teachers’ diagnostic competences in a video-based Learning environment: measuring the effect of different types of scaffolds

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1506-1526 | Received 08 Sep 2021, Accepted 24 May 2022, Published online: 13 Jun 2022

References

  • Arnold, J., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2014). Schüler als Forscher – Experimentieren kompetenzorientiert unterrichten und beurteilen [Pupils as researchers – teaching and assessing experimentation in a competence-oriented way]. Mathematisch und Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht, 67(2), 83–91.
  • Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers’ professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers (pp. 25–48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_2
  • Behling, F., Förtsch, C., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2019). Sprachsensibler Biologieunterricht – Förderung professioneller Handlungskompetenz und professioneller Wahrnehmung durch videogestützte live-Unterrichtsbeobachtung. Eine Projektbeschreibung [Language-sensitive biology instruction – Fostering professional competence and professional vision through video-based live lesson observation. A project description]. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik Der Naturwissenschaften, 25(1), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40573-019-00103-9
  • Belland, B. R. (2017). Computer-based scaffolding strategy. In B. R. Belland (Ed.), Instructional scaffolding in STEM education (pp. 107–126). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02565-0_5
  • Belland, B. R., Kim, C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2013). A framework for designing scaffolds that improve motivation and cognition. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.838920
  • Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Kim, N. J., & Lefler, M. (2017). Synthesizing results from empirical research on computer-based scaffolding in STEM education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 309–344. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316670999
  • Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J-E, & Shavelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 223(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194
  • Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Reseacher, 33(8), 90–114. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
  • Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293–332. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2
  • Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Fink, M. C., Timothy, V., Seidel, T., & Fischer, F. (2020). Facilitating diagnostic competences in higher education – A meta-analysis in medical and teacher education. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 157–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09492-2
  • Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T., & Fischer, F. (2020). Simulation-based learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(4), 499–541. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320933544
  • Cho, K-L, & Jonassen, D. H. (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505022
  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1988). Cognitive apprenticeship. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 8(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.5840/thinking19888129
  • Dorfner, T., Förtsch, C., Boone, W., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2019). Instructional quality features in videotaped biology lessons: Content-independent description of characteristics. Research in Science Education, 49(5), 1457–1491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9663-x
  • Dorfner, T., Förtsch, C., Spangler, M., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2019). Wie plane ich eine konzeptorientierte Biologiestunde? Ein Planungsmodell für den Biologieunterricht − Das Schalenmodell [How do I plan a concept-oriented biology lesson? A planning model for biology lessons - The shell model.]. MNU Journal, 72(4), 300–306.
  • Döring, N., & Bortz, J. (2016). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften [Research methods and evaluation in the social and human sciences]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41089-5
  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: (and sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll) (3rd ed.). Sage Publication. http://www.uk.sagepub.com/field3e/main.htm
  • Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Sodian, B., Hussmann, H., Pekrun, R., Neuhaus, B. J., Dorner, B., Pankofer, S., Fischer, M., Strijbos, J-W, Heene, M., & Eberle, J. (2014). Scientific reasoning and argumentation: Advancing an interdisciplinary research agenda in education. Frontline Learning Research, 2(3), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i2.96
  • Förtsch, C., Sommerhoff, D., Fischer, F., Fischer, M., Girwidz, R., Obersteiner, A., Reiss, K., Stürmer, K., Siebeck, M., Schmidmaier, R., Seidel, T., Ufer, S., Wecker, C., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2018). Systematizing professional knowledge of medical doctors and teachers: Development of an interdisciplinary framework in the context of diagnostic competences. Education Sciences, 8(4), 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040207
  • Förtsch, C., Werner, S., Kotzebue, L. v., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2016). Effects of biology teachers’ professional knowledge and cognitive activation on students’ achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 38(17), 2642–2666. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1257170
  • Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Fischer, M. R., Hoppe-Seyler, T., Karsten, G., Kiessling, C., Möller, G. E., Wiesbeck, A., & Prenzel, M. (2015). Fostering professional communication skills of future physicians and teachers: Effects of e-learning with video cases and role-play. Instructional Science, 43(4), 443–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9341-6
  • Gaudin, C., & Chaliès, S. (2015). Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 16, 41–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.06.001
  • Glogger-Frey, I., Herppich, S., & Seidel, T. (2018). Linking teachers’ professional knowledge and teachers’ actions: Judgment processes, judgments and training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76(1), 176–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.005
  • Grossmann, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 111(9), 2055–2100. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100905
  • Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 115–140). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Heitzmann, N. (2014). Fostering diagnostic competence in different domains [München. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität. 2014, Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München]. Deutsche Nationalbibliothek.
  • Heitzmann, N., Seidel, T., Hetmanek, A., Wecker, C., Fischer, M. R., Ufer, S., Schmidmaier, R., Neuhaus, B., Siebeck, M., Stürmer, K., Obersteiner, A., Reiss, K., Girwidz, R., Fischer, F., & Opitz, A. (2019). Facilitating diagnostic competences in simulations in higher education: A framework and a research agenda. Frontline Learning Research, 7(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v7i4.384
  • Jahn, G., Stürmer, K., Seidel, T., & Prenzel, M. (2014). Professionelle Unterrichtswahrnehmung von Lehramtsstudierenden [Professional teaching perception of student teachers]. Zeitschrift Für Entwicklungspsychologie Und Pädagogische Psychologie, 46(4), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637/a000114
  • Kramer, M., Förtsch, C., Boone, W. J., Seidel, T., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2021). Investigating pre-service biology teachers’ diagnostic competences: Relationships between professional knowledge, diagnostic activities, and diagnostic accuracy. Education Sciences, 11(3), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030089
  • Kramer, M., Förtsch, C., Seidel, T., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2021). Comparing two constructs for describing and analyzing teachers’ diagnostic processes. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, Article 100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100973
  • Kramer, M., Förtsch, C., Stürmer, J., Förtsch, S., Seidel, T., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2020). Measuring biology teachers’ professional vision: Development and validation of a video-based assessment tool. Cogent Journal, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1823155
  • Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2016). Cognitive load theory and the effects of transient information on the modality effect. Instructional Science, 44(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9362-9
  • Mayer, J., Grube, C., & Möller, A. (2008). Kompetenzmodell naturwissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisgewinnung [Competence model of scientific acquirement of knowledge.]. In U. Harms & A. Sandmann (Eds.), Lehr- und Lernforschung in der Biologiedidaktik (pp. 63–79). Studienverlag.
  • Meisert, A. (2012). Wie kann Biologieunterricht geplant werden? [How to plan biology lessons?]. In U. Spörhase-Eichmann & K. Köhler (Eds.), Biologie-Didaktik: Praxishandbuch für die Sekundarstufe l und ll (5th ed.) (pp. 241–274). Cornelsen.
  • Moosbrugger, H., & Kelava, A. (2012). Springer-Lehrbuch. Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. [Springer textbook. Test theory and questionnaire construction]. Springer. http://d-nb.info/101263051x/04
  • Nodari, C., & Steinmann, C. (2008). Fachdingsda: Fächerorientierter Grundwortschatz für das 5.-9. Schuljahr (1. Aufl.). [Fachdingsda: Subject-oriented basic vocabulary for the 5th-9th school year (1st ed.)] Lehrmittel der Interkantonalen Lehrmittelzentrale. Lehrmittelverlag des Kantons Aargau.
  • Nowak, K. H., Nehring, A., Tiemann, R., & Upmeier zu Belzen, A. (2013). Assessing students’ abilities in processes of scientific inquiry in biology using a paper-and-pencil test. Journal of Biological Education, 47(3), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.822747
  • Oh, P. S., & Oh, S. J. (2011). What teachers of science need to know about models: An overview. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1109–1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.502191
  • Ohle, A., & McElvany, N. (2015). Teachers’ diagnostic competences and their practical relevance. Journal of Educationals Research Online, 7(2), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:11487
  • Plass, J. L., & Pawar, S. (2020). Toward a taxonomy of adaptivity for learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1719943
  • Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., Kyza, E., Edelson, D., & Soloway, E. (2004). A scaffolding design Framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337–386. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_4
  • Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273–304. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2
  • Riebling, L. (2013). Sprachbildung im naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht: Eine Studie im Kontext migrationsbedingter sprachlicher Heterogenität (1. Aufl.) [Language education in science teaching: A study in the context of migration-related linguistic heterogeneity (1st ed.)]. In Interkulturelle Bildungsforschung (p. 20). Waxmann Verlag GmbH.
  • Roth, K. J., Bintz, J., Wickler, N. I. Z., Hvidsten, C., Taylor, J., Beardsley, P. M., Caine, A., & Wilson, C. D. (2017). Design principles for effective video-based professional development. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0091-2
  • Santagata, R., & Guarino, J. (2011). Using video to teach future teachers to learn from teaching. ZDM, 43(1), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0292-3
  • Schmelzing, S., van Driel, J. H., Jüttner, M., Brandenbusch, S., Sandmann, A., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2013). Development, evaluation, and validation of a paper-pencil test for measuring two components of biology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge concerning the “cardiovascular system. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(6), 1369–1390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9384-6
  • Schmiemann, P., Linsner, M., Wenning, S., Neuhaus, B. & Sandmann, A. (2011). Kontextorientiertes Lernen in Biologie – Aufgaben und Arbeitsmaterialien [Context-oriented learning in biology – tasks and working materials.] In P. Schmiemann & A. Sandmann (Hrsg.), Aufgaben im Kontext: Biologie (p. 4–12). Seelze: Friedrich Verlag.
  • Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454–499. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307310317
  • Seidel, T., & Stürmer, K. (2014). Modeling and measuring the structure of professional vision in preservice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 739–771. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214531321
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Reseacher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
  • Simons, K. D., & Klein, J. D. (2007). The impact of scaffolding and student achievement levels in a problem-based learning environment. Instructional Science, 35(1), 41–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9002-5
  • Südkamp, A., Möller, J., & Pohlmann, B. (2008). Der simulierte Klassenraum [The simulated classroom]. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie, 22(3-4), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.22.34.261
  • Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
  • Upmeier zu Belzen, A., & Krüger, D. (2010). Modellkompetenz im Biologieunterricht [Model competence in biology teaching]. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik Der Naturwissenschaften, 16, 41–57.
  • Voss, T., & Kunter, M. (2013). Teachers’ general pedagogical/psychological knowledge. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers (pp. 207–227). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_10
  • Vygotskij, L. S. (1979). Interaction between learning and development. In M. Cole & L. S. Vygotskij (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (2nd ed.) (pp. 79–91). Harvard Univ. Press.
  • Wadouh, J., Liu, N., Sandmann, A., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2014). The effect of knowledge linking levels in biology lessons upon students’ knowledge structure. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9390-8
  • Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.