588
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Scientific attitudes: gender differences, impact on physics scores and choices to study physics at higher levels among pre-college STEM students

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 1816-1839 | Received 16 Oct 2021, Accepted 29 Jun 2022, Published online: 08 Jul 2022

References

  • Aiken, L. R., & Aiken, D. R. (1969). Recent research on attitudes concerning science. Science Education, 53(4), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730530405
  • Bajwa, S., & Mahajan, M. (2012). Scientific attitude scale. National Psychological Corporation Agra, India. http://www.npcindia.com/downloads/Catalogue-NPC-2019.pdf.
  • Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2008). Girls’ biology, boys’ physics: Evidence from free-choice science learning settings. Research in Science & Technological Education, 26(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140701847538
  • Barmby, P., Kind, P. M., & Jones, K. (2008). Examining changing attitudes in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1075–1093. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701344966
  • Bayram, H., & Comek, A. (2009). Examining the relations between science attitudes, logical thinking ability, information literacy and academic achievement through internet assisted chemistry education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1526–1532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.269
  • Blue, J., Traxler, A., & Cochran, G. (2019). Resource letter: GP-1: Gender and physics. American Journal of Physics, 87(8), 616–626. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5114628
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://www.utstat.toronto.edu/~brunner/oldclass/378f16/readings/CohenPower.pdf.
  • Cooper, G., & Berry, A. (2020). Demographic predictors of senior secondary participation in biology, physics, chemistry and earth/space sciences: Students’ access to cultural, social and science capital. International Journal of Science Education, 42(1), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1708510
  • Cwik, S., & Singh, C. (2021). How perception of learning environment predicts male and female students’ grades and motivational outcomes in algebra-based introductory physics courses. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020143
  • Damanik, D. P., & Bukit, N. (2013). Analyze critical thinking skills and scientific attitude in physics learning used inquiry training and direct instruction learning model. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 2(1), 16–17. https://doi.org/10.22611/jpf.v2i1.4333
  • Dasdemir, I. (2016). The effect of the 5E instructional model enriched with cooperative learning and animations on seventh-grade students’ academic achievement and scientific attitudes. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 9(1), 21–38.
  • Davies, J. (2003). Expressions of gender: An analysis of pupils’ gendered discourse styles in small group classroom discussions. Discourse & Society, 14(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926503014002853
  • DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (L. Bickman & G. Rog, debra (eds.); fourth). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • DeWitt, J., Archer, L., & Moote, J. (2019). 15/16-year-old students’ reasons for choosing and not choosing physics at A level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(6), 1071–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9900-4
  • Ekawati, E. Y. (2017). A model of scientific attitudes assessment by observation in physics learning based scientific approach: Case study of dynamic fluid topic in high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 795, 012056–012059. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/795/1/012056
  • Feder, T. (2011). Convincing US states to require physics. Physics Today, 64(7), 29–30. https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.1163
  • Francis, B., Archer, L., Moote, J., DeWitt, J., MacLeod, E., & Yeomans, L. (2017). The construction of physics as a quintessentially masculine subject: Young people’s perceptions of gender issues in access to physics. Sex Roles, 76(3), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0669-z
  • Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitude measurement a critique of some recent research. Educational Research, 17(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188750170203
  • Gauld, C. F. (2005). Habits of mind, scholarship and decision making in science and religion. Science & Education, 14(3), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-1997-x
  • Gauld, C. F., & Hukins, A. A. (1980). Scientific attitudes: A review. Studies in Science Education, 7(1), 129–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268008559877
  • Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. P. (1999). Cognition, affect, and the prediction of social attitudes. In W. Stroebe, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of Social Psychology Vol. 10, issue 1 (pp. 75–99). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779943000026.
  • Hemphill, J. F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58(1), 78–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.78
  • Hubley, A. M. (2014). Discriminant validity. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being research (pp. 1664–1667). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_751
  • Ilmi, A. M., & Sunarno, W. (2020). Development of TPACK based-physics learning media to improve HOTS and scientific attitude. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440, 012049–012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012049
  • Institute of Physics. (2017). What we’re doing to address gender imbalance in physics. https://www.iop.org/what-were-doing-address-gender-imbalance-physics.
  • Jones, B., & Butts, B. (1983). Development of a set of scales to measure selected scientific attitudes. Research in Science Education, 13(1), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356700
  • Khan, M., & Siddiqui, M. A.. (2017). Impact of scientific attitude and higher mental abilities on physics achievement among pre-university students, In S. V. Sharma (Ed.), Science Education (pp. 39–43). Regional Institute of Education, Ajmer, NCERT, India.
  • Khan, M., & Siddiqui, M. A. (2020). Examining scientific attitude scales in India: Development and validation of a new scale. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/8557
  • Kour, S. (2015). Scientific temper among academically high and low achieving adolescent girls. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(34), 96–101. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/27613/28328.
  • Lacap, M. P. (2015). The scientific attitudes of students major in science in the new teacher education curriculum. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(5), 7–15.
  • Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
  • Lau, K.-C., & Ho, S.-C. E. (2022). Attitudes towards science, teaching practices, and science performance in PISA 2015: Multilevel analysis of the Chinese and western top performers. Research in Science Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09954-6
  • Lee, K. H. (1998). The relations between science related attitudes and science achievement of high school students. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 18(3), 415–425. http://www.koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO199817347320190.page.
  • Lichtenstein, M. J., Owen, S. V., Blalock, C. L., Liu, Y., Ramirez, K. A., Pruski, L. A., Marshall, C. E., & Toepperwein, M. A. (2008). Psychometric reevaluation of the scientific attitude inventory-revised (SAI-II). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 600–616. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20244
  • Lin, W.-L., & Yao, G. (2014). Concurrent validity. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being research (pp. 1184–1185). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_516.
  • Mahulae, P. S., Sirait, M., & Sirait, M. (2017). The effect of inquiry training learning model using PhET media and scientific attitude on students’ science process skills. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 7(5), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0705012429
  • Mao, P., Cai, Z., He, J., Chen, X., & Fan, X. (2021). The relationship between attitude toward science and academic achievement in science: A three-level meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784068
  • Mason, L., Boscolo, P., Tornatora, M. C., & Ronconi, L. (2013). Besides knowledge: A cross-sectional study on the relations between epistemic beliefs, achievement goals, self-beliefs, and achievement in science. Instructional Science, 41(1), 49–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9210-0
  • Mattern, N., & Schau, C. (2002). Gender differences in science attitude-achievement relationships over time among white middle-school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 324–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10024
  • Maxwell, S. E., Kelley, K., & Rausch, J. R. (2008). Sample size planning for statistical power and accuracy in parameter estimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 537–563. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093735
  • McIntyre, L. (2019). The importance of scientific attitude. In The scientific attitude: Defending science from denial, fraud, and pseudoscience (pp. 47–64). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12203.001.0001.
  • Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R., Eisman, E. J., Kubiszyn, T. W., & Reed, G. M. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56(2), 128–165. https://www.utoledo.edu/al/psychology/pdfs/meyer/Meyer2001PsychTestingPsychAssessment.pdf https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.128
  • Misbah, M., Dewantara, D., Hasan, S. M., & Annur, S. (2018). The development of student worksheet by using guided inquiry learning model to train student’s scientific attitude. Unnes Science Education Journal, 7(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v7i1.15799
  • Moore, R. W., & Foy, R. L. H. (1997). The scientific attitude inventory: A revision (SAI II). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199704)34:4<327::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-T
  • Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2013a). Inequality in experiences of physics education: Secondary school girls’ and boys’ perceptions of their physics education and intentions to continue with physics after the age of 16. International Journal of Science Education, 35(11), 1824–1845. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.762699
  • Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2013b). What sort of girl wants to study physics after the age of 16? Findings from a large-scale UK survey. International Journal of Science Education, 35(17), 2979–2998. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.681076
  • Murphy, P., & Whitelegg, E. (2006). Girls in the physics classroom: A review of the research on the participation of girls in physics. Insttitute of Physics. http://www.iop.org/education/teacher/support/girls_physics/review/file_41599.pdf.
  • NCERT. (2006). Position paper: National focus group on teaching of science. http://www.ncert.nic.in/new_ncert/ncert/rightside/links/pdf/focus_group/science.pdf.
  • Nissen, J. M. (2019). Gender differences in self-efficacy states in high school physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 013102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.013102
  • Nugraha, I., Putri, N. K., & Sholihin, H. (2020). An analysis of the relationship between students’ scientific attitude and students’ learning style in junior high school. Journal of Science Learning, 3(3), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v3i3.22873
  • Ocak, G., Dogruel, A. B., & Tepe, M. E. (2021). An analysis of the relationship between problem solving skills and scientific attitudes of secondary school students. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.780710
  • OECD. (2018). PISA 2018 results: Combined executive summaries. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/Combined_Executive_Summaries_PISA_2018.pdf.
  • Olasehinde, K. J., & Olatoye, R. A. (2014). Scientific attitude, attitude to science and science achievement of senior secondary school students in katsina state, Nigeria. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(1), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.5901/JESR.2014.V4N1P445
  • Oon, P. T., Cheng, M. M. W., & Wong, A. S. L. (2020). Gender differences in attitude towards science: Methodology for prioritising contributing factors. International Journal of Science Education, 42(1), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1701217
  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
  • Paulose, P. J. (1995). The influence of scientific attitude of university entrants on their process outcomes in physics. Experiments in Education, 23(8), 131–138.
  • Pelch, M. (2018). Gendered differences in academic emotions and their implications for student success in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0130-7
  • Rainey, K., Dancy, M., Mickelson, R., Stearns, E., & Moller, S. (2018). Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0115-6
  • Reid, N., & Skryabina, E. A. (2002). Attitudes towards physics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140220130939
  • Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2019). Investigating gender differences in mathematics and science: Results from the 2011 trends in mathematics and science survey. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9630-6
  • Rohaeti, E., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2020). Research-oriented collaborative inquiry learning model: Improving student’s scientific attitudes in general chemistry. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(1), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.108
  • Saputri, A. A., & Wilujeng, I. (2017). Developing physics E-scaffolding teaching media to increase the eleventh-grade students’ problem solving ability and scientific attitude. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(4), 729–745. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1144754.pdf.
  • Sari, P. M., Sudargo, F., & Priyandoko, D. (2018). Correlation among science process skill, concept comprehension, and scientific attitude on regulation system materials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948, 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012008
  • Sethi, G. K., & Saini, N. K. (2019). Prevalence of superstitions in Indian society in 21st century. International Journal of Nursing Education, 11(4), 56. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-9357.2019.00089.8
  • Sheldrake, R., Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2019). Students’ changing attitudes and aspirations towards physics during secondary school. Research in Science Education, 49(6), 1809–1834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9676-5
  • Siddiqui, M. A., & Khan, M. (2018). A study of scientific attitude, teaching effectiveness and physics achievement among physics senior secondary students. IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature, 6(8), 71–78. www.impactjournals.us
  • Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE project: An overview and key findings. https://roseproject.no/network/countries/norway/eng/nor-Sjoberg-Schreiner-overview-2010.pdf.
  • Srivastava, S. (2014). Achievement in science as predictors of students’ scientific attitude. European Academic Research, 2(2), 2879–2893. www.euacademic.org.
  • Supardi, R., Istiyono, E., & Setialaksana, W. (2019). Developing scientific attitudes instrument of students in chemistry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), 012025–012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012025
  • Suryawati, E., Osman, K., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). The effectiveness of RANGKA contextual teaching and learning on student’s problem solving skills and scientific attitude. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1717–1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.389
  • The Association of Academies and Societies of Sciences in Asia (AASSA). (2015). Women in science and technology in Asia. http://aassa.asia.
  • Tytler, R. (2014). Attitudes, identity, and aspirations toward science. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on Science Education Vol. 2 (pp. 82–103). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267.
  • Vilia, P., & Candeias, A. A. (2020). Attitude towards the discipline of physics-chemistry and school achievement: Revisiting factor structure to assess gender differences in Portuguese high-school students. International Journal of Science Education, 42(1), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1706012
  • Willson, V. L. (1983). A meta-analysis of the relationship between science achievement and science attitude: Kindergarten through college. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(9), 839–850. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660200906
  • Wiwin, E., & Kustijono, R. (2018). The use of physics practicum to train science process skills and its effect on scientific attitude of vocational high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 997), https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/997/1/012040
  • Yoon, H., Woo, A. J., Treagust, D. F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2015). Second-year college students’ scientific attitudes and creative thinking ability: Influence of a problem-based learning (PBL) chemistry laboratory course. In M. Kahveci, & M. K. Orgill (Eds.), Affective dimensions in chemistry education (pp. 217–233). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45085-7_11.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.