The role of language in students’ justifications of chemical phenomena

References

• Abedi, J. (2002). Assessment and accommodations of English language: Issues, concerns, and recommendations. Journal of School Improvement, 3(1), 83–89.
   Google Scholar
• Abedi, J. (2015). Language issues in item development. Handbook of Test Development, Civ, 355–373. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874776.ch17
   Google Scholar
• Abedi, J., Hofstetter, C. H., & Lord, C. (2004). Assessment accommodations for English language learners: Implications for policy-based empirical research. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abedi, J., & Lord, C. (2001). The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 14(3), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abedi, J., Zhang, Y., Rowe, S. E., & Lee, H. (2020). Examining effectiveness and validity of accommodations for English language learners in mathematics: An evidence-based computer accommodation decision system. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 39(4), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afitska, O., & Heaton, T. J. (2019). Mitigating the effect of language in the assessment of science: A study of English-language learners in primary classrooms in the United Kingdom. Science Education, 103(6), 1396–1422. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allensworth, E. (2005). Graduation and dropout trends in Chicago: A look at cohorts of students from 1991 through 2004. In Consortium on Chicago school research (Issue January). papers://e97baf73-a10d-438d-985b-bee59744e11f/Paper/p939
   Google Scholar
• Amano, T., González-Varo, J. P., & Sutherland, W. J. (2016). Languages are still a major barrier to global science. PLoS Biology, 14(12), e2000933. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2000933
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atkinson, M. B., & Bretz, S. L. (2021). Measuring changes in undergraduate chemistry students’ reasoning with reaction coordinate diagrams: A longitudinal, multi-institution study. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(4), 1064–1076. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, N., Noyes, K., & Cooper, M. M. (2016). Characterizing students’ mechanistic reasoning about London dispersion forces. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(10), 1713–1724. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S. T., Villado, A. J., Lukasik, M. A., Belau, L., & Briggs, A. L. (2011). Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37(3), 709–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310365001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodé, N. E., Deng, J. M., & Flynn, A. B. (2019). Getting past the rules and to the WHY: Causal mechanistic arguments when judging the plausibility of organic reaction mechanisms. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(6), 1068–1082. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N. J. S., Nagashima, S. O., Fu, A., Timms, M., & Wilson, M. (2010). A framework for analyzing scientific reasoning in assessments. Educational Assessment, 15(3), 142–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2010.530562
   Google Scholar
• Buxton, C., Allexsaht-Snider, M., Aghasaleh, R., Kayumova, S., Kim, S.-H., Choi, Y.-J., & Cohen, A. (2014a). Potential benefits of bilingual constructed response science assessments for understanding bilingual learners’ emergent use of language of scientific investigation practices. Double Helix, 2(September 2016), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.37514/DBH-J.2014.2.1.05
   Google Scholar
• Buxton, C. A., Salinas, A., Mahotiere, M., Lee, O., & Secada, W. (2015). Fourth-grade emergent bilingual learners’ scientific reasoning complexity, controlled experiment practices, and content knowledge when discussing school, home, and play contexts. Teachers College Record, 117(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carle, M. S., El Issa, R., Pilote, N., & Flynn, A. B. (2020). Ten essential delocalization learning outcomes: How well are they achieved? ChemRxiv, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.13322771.v2
   Google Scholar
• Caspari, I., Kranz, D., & Graulich, N. (2018). Resolving the complexity of organic chemistry students’ reasoning through the lens of a mechanistic framework. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(4), 1117–1141. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00131F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y., Dharwadkar, S., Sheridan, V., Rojas, C. R., Bosch Grau, M., & Gordin, M. (2019). Science’s language barrier. Nature, 570(7760), 265–267. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01797-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childs, P. E., Markic, S., & Ryan, M. C. (2015). The role of language in teaching and learning chemistry. In J. Garcia-Martinez & E. Serrano-Torregrossa (Eds.), Chemistry education: Best practices, opportunities and trends (pp. 421–445). Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, W. Y. (2010). Linguistic profiling in education: How accent bias denies equal educational opportunities to students of color. The Scholar, 12(355), 356–384.
   Google Scholar
• Cikmaz, A., Fulmer, G., Yaman, F., & Hand, B. (2021). Examining the interdependence in the growth of students’ language and argument competencies in replicative and generative learning environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(10), 1457–1488. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. M., Kouyoumdjian, H., & Underwood, S. M. (2016). Investigating students’ reasoning about acid–base reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(10), 1703–1712. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandell, O. M., Kouyoumdjian, H., Underwood, S. M., & Cooper, M. M. (2019). Reasoning about reactions in organic chemistry: Starting it in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (1981). Empirical and theoretical underpinnings of bilingual education. Journal of Education, 163(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748116300104
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, S., & Millar, R. (1988). Language and conceptual understanding in science: A comparison of English and Asian language speaking children. Research in Science & Technological Education, 6(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514880060106
   Google Scholar
• Deng, J. M., & Flynn, A. B. (2021). Reasoning, granularity, and comparisons in students’ arguments on two organic chemistry items. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(3), 749–771. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00320D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elnathan, R. (2021). English is the language of science — But precision is tough as a non-native speaker. Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00899-y
   Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, J. (2019). The linguistic disadvantage of scholars who write in English as an additional language: Myth or reality. Language Teaching, 52(2), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, D. J., Rivera, M., Leseaux, N., Kieffer, M., & Rivera, H. (2006). Practical guidelines for the education of English language learners: Research-based recommendations for instruction and academic interventions. 2006(November 7). http://www.centeroninstruction.org/files/ELL1-Interventions.pdf
   Google Scholar
• González-Howard, M., & McNeill, K. L. (2016). Learning in a community of practice: Factors impacting English-learning students’ engagement in scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(4), 527–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Howard, M., & Suárez, E. (2021). Retiring the term English language learners: Moving toward linguistic justice through asset-oriented framing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(5), 749–752. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanauer, D. I., & Englander, K. (2011). Quantifying the burden of writing research articles in a second language: Data from Mexican scientists. Written Communication, 28(4), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088311420056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanauer, D. I., Sheridan, C. L., & Englander, K. (2019). Linguistic injustice in the writing of research articles in English as a second language: Data from Taiwanese and Mexican researchers. Written Communication, 36(1), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318804821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R. B., Mack, M. R., Bryant, J., Theobald, E. J., & Freeman, S. (2020). Reducing achievement gaps in undergraduate general chemistry could lift underrepresented students into a “hyperpersistent zone”. Science Advances, 6(24), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz5687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higher Education Strategy Associates. (2020). The state of post-secondary education in Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstra, B., Kulkarni, V. V., Galvez, S. M. N., He, B., Jurafsky, D., & McFarland, D. A. (2020). The diversity–innovation paradox in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(17), 9284–9291. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1915378117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J. (2008). How accurate are ESL students’ holistic writing scores on large-scale assessments?—A generalizability theory approach. Assessing Writing, 13(3), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Impellizzeri, S., & Coe, I. R. (2021). The complex chemistry of diversity and inclusion: A 30-year synthesis. Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 99(8), 653–660. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjc-2021-0063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanno, Y., & Cromley, J. G. (2013). English language learners’ access to and attainment in postsecondary education. TESOL Quarterly, 47(1), 89–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieffer, M. J., Lesaux, N. K., Rivera, M., & Francis, D. J. (2009). Accommodations for English language learners taking large-scale assessments: A meta-analysis on effectiveness and validity. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1168–1201. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309332490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (1970). Estimating the reliability, systematic error and random error of interval data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krizman, J., Skoe, E., Marian, V., & Kraus, N. (2014). Bilingualism increases neural response consistency and attentional control: Evidence for sensory and cognitive coupling. Brain and Language, 128(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2014.371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaCosse, J., Canning, E. A., Bowman, N. A., Murphy, M. C., & Logel, C. (2020). A social-belonging intervention improves STEM outcomes for students who speak English as a second language. Science Advances, 6(40), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb6543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. N. (2018). Breaking the language barrier: Equitable assessment in general chemistry [Doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada]. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2018-58618-069&lang=de&site=ehost-live
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E. N., & Orgill, M. (2021). Toward equitable assessment of English language learners in general chemistry: Identifying supportive features in assessment items. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(4), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00370
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O. (2005). Science education with English language learners: Synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 491–530. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075004491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O. (2021). Asset-oriented framing of science and language learning with multilingual learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(7), 1073–1079. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-English-language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27(4), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027004012
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to next generation science standards and with implications for common core state standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13480524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O., & Stephens, A. (2020). English learners in STEM subjects: Contemporary views on STEM subjects and language with English learners. Educational Researcher, 49(6), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20923708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Les CÉGEPs du Quebec. (2022). What is a CÉGEP? https://www.cegepsquebec.ca/en/cegeps/presentation/what-is-a-cegep/
   Google Scholar
• Liamputtong, P. (2008). Doing cross-cultural research: Ethical and methodological perspectives.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, P., & Crusan, D. (2011). How faculty attitudes and expectations toward student nationality affect writing assessment. Across the Disciplines, 8(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.37514/atd-j.2011.8.4.23
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, E. G., Bunch, G. C., & Shaw, J. M. (2012). Navigating the language demands of an inquiry-based science performance assessment: Classroom challenges and opportunities for English learners. Science Education, 96(4), 631–651. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maerten-Rivera, J., Myers, N., Lee, O., & Penfield, R. (2010). Student and school predictors of high-stakes assessment in science. Science Education, 94(6), 937–962. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940–967. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marian, V., Chabal, S., Bartolotti, J., Bradley, K., & Hernandez, A. E. (2014). Differential recruitment of executive control regions during phonological competition in monolinguals and bilinguals. Brain and Language, 139, 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinsey & Company. (2015). Why diversity matters. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/why-diversity-matters#
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, L. (2005). Faking equity: High-stakes testing and the education of Latino youth. In A. Valanzeula (Ed.), Leaving children behind: How “Texas style” accountability fails Latino youth (pp. 57–112). University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Berland, L. K. (2010). A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 94(5), 765–793. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008a). Inquiry and scientific explanations: Helping students use evidence and reasoning. In Science as inquiry in the secondary setting (pp. 121–134).
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008b). Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153–191. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milnes, T., & Cheng, L. (2008). Teachers’ assessment of ESL students in mainstream classes: Challenges, strategies, and decision-making. TESL Canada Journal, 26(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v26i1.129
   Google Scholar
• Moon, A., Moeller, R., Gere, A. R., & Shultz, G. V. (2019). Application and testing of a framework for characterizing the quality of scientific reasoning in chemistry students’ writing on ocean acidification. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(3), 484–494. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00005d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, A., Stanford, C., Cole, R., & Towns, M. H. (2016). The nature of students’ chemical reasoning employed in scientific argumentation in physical chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(2), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00207a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira, P., Marzabal, A., & Talanquer, V. (2019). Using a mechanistic framework to characterise chemistry students’ reasoning in written explanations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8rp00159f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myles, J., & Cheng, L. (2003). The social and cultural life of non-native English speaking international graduate students at a Canadian university. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(3), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00028-6
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Science Engineering and Medicine. (2018). English learners in STEM subjects: Transforming classrooms, schools, and lives. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25182
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). The condition of education: English language learners in public schools.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards. https://www.nextgenscience.org/
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. (2020). 2019 doctorate recipients from U.S. universities: Vol. NSF 21-308 (Issue December 2020). http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2016/nsf16300/digest/nsf16300.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, R. P. (2021). Science’s English dominance hinders diversity—But the community can work toward change. Science. https://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2020/10/science-s-english-dominance-hinders-diversity-community-can-work-toward-change
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. F., & Patterson, A. (2011). Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction? Science Education, 95(4), 627–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxley, E., & de Cat, C. (2019). A systematic review of language and literacy interventions in children and adolescents with English as an additional language (EAL). The Language Learning Journal, 49(0), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1597146
   Google Scholar
• Project Atlas. (2019). Research and insights: Global mobility trends. https://www.iie.org/Research-and-Insights/Project-Atlas/Explore-Data/Infographics/2019-Project-Atlas-Infographics
   Google Scholar
• Pyburn, D. T., Pazicni, S., Benassi, V. A., & Tappin, E. E. (2013). Assessing the relation between language comprehension and performance in general chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 524–541. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3rp00014a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez-Castañeda, V. (2020). Disadvantages in preparing and publishing scientific papers caused by the dominance of the English language in science: The case of Colombian researchers in biological sciences. PLoS ONE, 15(9 September), e0238372. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, R. V., & Birdsong, D. (2014). Processing focus structure in L1 and L2 French: L2 proficiency effects on ERPs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(3), 535–564. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russ, R. S., Scherr, R. E., Hammer, D., & Mikeska, J. (2008). Recognizing reasoning in student scientific inquiry: A framework for discourse analysis developed from philosophy of science. Science Education, 92(3), 499–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryoo, K., & Bedell, K. (2019). Supporting linguistically diverse students’ science learning with dynamic visualizations through discourse-rich practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(3), 270–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevian, H., & Talanquer, V. (2014). Rethinking chemistry: A learning progression on chemical thinking. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3rp00111c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, M. A. (2007). Striving for equitable classroom assessments for linguistic minorities: Strategies for and effects of revising life science items. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 864–881. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. (2018). Truth under fire in a post-fact world. https://horizons.gc.ca/en/2018/10/19/the-next-generation-of-emerging-global-challenges/#truth-under-fire
   Google Scholar
• Solano-Flores, G., & Trumbull, E. (2003). Examining language in context: The need for new research and practice paradigms in the testing of English-language learners. Educational Researcher, 32(2), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032002003
   Google Scholar
• Sotelo-Dynega, M., Ortiz, S. O., Flanagan, D. P., & Chaplin, W. F. (2013). English language proficiency and test performance: An evaluation of bilingual students with the Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cogntitive abilities. Psychology in the Schools, 50(8), 781–797. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, L. H., Bianchini, J. A., & Lee, J. S. (2014). Engaging in argument and communicating information: A case study of English language learners and their science teacher in an urban high school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 31–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, S., & Thurlow, M. (2002). Universally designed assessments: Better tests for everyone! In NCEO policy directions.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048405985200191
   Google Scholar
• Uhl Chamot, A. (1995). Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach: CALLA in Arlington, Virginia. Bilingual Research Journal, 19(3 & 4), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.1995.10162680
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
   Google Scholar
• Université de Montréal. (2022). Facts and figures. https://www.umontreal.ca/en/udem/#facts-and-figures
   Google Scholar
• University of Ottawa. (2020). Quick facts 2020. https://www.uottawa.ca/institutional-research-planning/resources/facts-figures/quick-facts
   Google Scholar
• University of Ottawa. (2022a). Francophonie and bilingualism. https://www.uottawa.ca/francophonie-bilingualism/
   Google Scholar
• University of Ottawa. (2022b). Undergraduate studies in Science. https://www2.uottawa.ca/faculty-science/programs/undergraduate
   Google Scholar
• Valantine, H. A., Collins, F. S., & Verma, I. M. (2015). National institutes of health addresses the science of diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(40), 12240–12242. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515612112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, F. M., Schmidt-Mccormack, J. A., Wilhelm, C. A., Karlin, A., Sattar, A., Thompson, B. C., Gere, A. R., & Shultz, G. V. (2020). What students write about when students write about mechanisms: Analysis of features present in students’ written descriptions of an organic reaction mechanism. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(4), 1148–1172. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00185a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinrich, M. L., & Talanquer, V. (2016). Mapping students’ modes of reasoning when thinking about chemical reactions used to make a desired product. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(2), 394–406. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00208g
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. K., Kao, J. C., Griffin, N., Herman, J., Bachman, P. L., Chang, S. M., & Farnsworth, T. (2008). Issues in assessing English language learners: English language proficiency measures and accommodation uses (CRESST Report 732). Review Literature and Arts of the Americas, 1–96.
   Google Scholar
• Yore, L. D., Hand, B., Goldman, S. R., Hildebrand, G. M., Osborne, J. F., Treagust, D. F., & Wallace, C. S. (2004). New directions in language and science education research. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(3), 347–352. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.3.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar